Rule-Based Artificial Intelligence and Workflow to Prompt Early Sepsis Management: A Quality Improvement Project.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Emily Grooms, Karen Biesack, Bart Abban, Joan Kramer
{"title":"Rule-Based Artificial Intelligence and Workflow to Prompt Early Sepsis Management: A Quality Improvement Project.","authors":"Emily Grooms, Karen Biesack, Bart Abban, Joan Kramer","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early identification and management of sepsis improves patient outcomes, yet hospitals struggle to consistently screen patients on arrival and during hospitalization. The Centers for Disease Control published Hospital Sepsis Program Core Elements to guide hospital sepsis management and outcomes improvement efforts and will measure the sepsis core elements with the National Healthcare Safety Network Annual Hospital Survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To further sepsis care management, our community-owned, nonprofit hospital implemented an emergency department quality improvement project, introducing rule-based artificial intelligence (AI) for sepsis identification with a workflow. Objectives were to measure rule-based AI sensitivity, sepsis management compliance, length of stay (LOS), and mortality rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 895 cases were included in the final dataset, 370 preimplementation and 525 postimplementation. Postimplementation rule-based AI alerts identified 93.9% (493 of 525) cases for sepsis management interventions. After rule and workflow implementation, combined 3-hour compliance for antibiotic given, blood culture drawn, and lactate measured was 89.5%. Average LOS decreased by 2.3 days (p < .001), and mortality per 100 cases decreased by 22.3% (p = .0998).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing rule-based AI software to identify severe sepsis in conjunction with a sepsis workflow decreased LOS for patients diagnosed with either severe sepsis or septic shock.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000493","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Early identification and management of sepsis improves patient outcomes, yet hospitals struggle to consistently screen patients on arrival and during hospitalization. The Centers for Disease Control published Hospital Sepsis Program Core Elements to guide hospital sepsis management and outcomes improvement efforts and will measure the sepsis core elements with the National Healthcare Safety Network Annual Hospital Survey.

Methods: To further sepsis care management, our community-owned, nonprofit hospital implemented an emergency department quality improvement project, introducing rule-based artificial intelligence (AI) for sepsis identification with a workflow. Objectives were to measure rule-based AI sensitivity, sepsis management compliance, length of stay (LOS), and mortality rate.

Results: A total of 895 cases were included in the final dataset, 370 preimplementation and 525 postimplementation. Postimplementation rule-based AI alerts identified 93.9% (493 of 525) cases for sepsis management interventions. After rule and workflow implementation, combined 3-hour compliance for antibiotic given, blood culture drawn, and lactate measured was 89.5%. Average LOS decreased by 2.3 days (p < .001), and mortality per 100 cases decreased by 22.3% (p = .0998).

Conclusions: Implementing rule-based AI software to identify severe sepsis in conjunction with a sepsis workflow decreased LOS for patients diagnosed with either severe sepsis or septic shock.

基于规则的人工智能和工作流促进早期败血症管理:一个质量改进项目。
简介:败血症的早期识别和管理可以改善患者的预后,但医院很难在患者到达和住院期间持续筛查患者。疾病控制中心发布了医院败血症项目核心要素,以指导医院败血症管理和结果改善工作,并将通过国家医疗安全网络年度医院调查来衡量败血症核心要素。方法:为进一步加强败血症护理管理,我们社区所有的非营利性医院实施了急诊科质量改进项目,引入基于规则的人工智能(AI)进行败血症识别和工作流程。目的是衡量基于规则的人工智能敏感性、败血症管理依从性、住院时间(LOS)和死亡率。结果:最终数据集中共纳入895例,其中实施前370例,实施后525例。实施后基于规则的人工智能警报确定了93.9%(525例中的493例)败血症管理干预病例。在规则和工作流程实施后,给予抗生素、抽取血液培养和测量乳酸的3小时合规性为89.5%。平均生存时间减少2.3天(p < 0.001),每100例死亡率减少22.3% (p = 0.998)。结论:采用基于规则的人工智能软件识别严重脓毒症并结合脓毒症工作流程可降低诊断为严重脓毒症或感染性休克的患者的LOS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信