Accuracy of AI-Based Algorithms in Pulmonary Embolism Detection on Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
{"title":"Accuracy of AI-Based Algorithms in Pulmonary Embolism Detection on Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Seyed Ali Nabipoorashrafi, Arsalan Seyedi, Razman Arabzadeh Bahri, Amirhossein Yadegar, Mostafa Shomal-Zadeh, Fatemeh Mohammadi, Samira Amin Afshari, Negar Firoozeh, Navida Noroozzadeh, Farbod Khosravi, Sanaz Asadian, Hamid Chalian","doi":"10.1007/s10278-025-01645-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have been designed for detection of pulmonary embolism (PE) using computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA). Due to the rapid development of this field and the lack of an updated meta-analysis, we aimed to systematically review the available literature about the accuracy of AI-based algorithms to diagnose PE via CTPA. We searched EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane for studies assessing the accuracy of AI-based algorithms. Studies that reported sensitivity and specificity were included. The R software was used for univariate meta-analysis and drawing summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves based on bivariate analysis. To explore the source of heterogeneity, sub-group analysis was performed (PROSPERO: CRD42024543107). A total of 1722 articles were found, and after removing duplicated records, 1185 were screened. Twenty studies with 26 AI models/population met inclusion criteria, encompassing 11,950 participants. Univariate meta-analysis showed a pooled sensitivity of 91.5% (95% CI 85.5-95.2) and specificity of 84.3 (95% CI 74.9-90.6) for PE detection. Additionally, in the bivariate sROC, the pooled area under the curved (AUC) was 0.923 out of 1, indicating a very high accuracy of AI algorithms in the detection of PE. Also, subgroup meta-analysis showed geographical area as a potential source of heterogeneity where the I<sup>2</sup> for sensitivity and specificity in the Asian article subgroup were 60% and 6.9%, respectively. Findings highlight the promising role of AI in accurately diagnosing PE while also emphasizing the need for further research to address regional variations and improve generalizability.</p>","PeriodicalId":516858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-025-01645-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Several artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have been designed for detection of pulmonary embolism (PE) using computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA). Due to the rapid development of this field and the lack of an updated meta-analysis, we aimed to systematically review the available literature about the accuracy of AI-based algorithms to diagnose PE via CTPA. We searched EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane for studies assessing the accuracy of AI-based algorithms. Studies that reported sensitivity and specificity were included. The R software was used for univariate meta-analysis and drawing summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves based on bivariate analysis. To explore the source of heterogeneity, sub-group analysis was performed (PROSPERO: CRD42024543107). A total of 1722 articles were found, and after removing duplicated records, 1185 were screened. Twenty studies with 26 AI models/population met inclusion criteria, encompassing 11,950 participants. Univariate meta-analysis showed a pooled sensitivity of 91.5% (95% CI 85.5-95.2) and specificity of 84.3 (95% CI 74.9-90.6) for PE detection. Additionally, in the bivariate sROC, the pooled area under the curved (AUC) was 0.923 out of 1, indicating a very high accuracy of AI algorithms in the detection of PE. Also, subgroup meta-analysis showed geographical area as a potential source of heterogeneity where the I2 for sensitivity and specificity in the Asian article subgroup were 60% and 6.9%, respectively. Findings highlight the promising role of AI in accurately diagnosing PE while also emphasizing the need for further research to address regional variations and improve generalizability.
已经设计了几种人工智能(AI)算法,用于使用计算机断层肺血管造影(CTPA)检测肺栓塞(PE)。由于这一领域的快速发展和缺乏更新的荟萃分析,我们旨在系统地回顾现有的关于基于人工智能的算法通过CTPA诊断PE的准确性的文献。我们检索了EMBASE、PubMed、Web of Science和Cochrane,以评估基于人工智能的算法的准确性。报告敏感性和特异性的研究被纳入。采用R软件进行单因素荟萃分析,在双因素分析的基础上绘制接受者工作特征(sROC)曲线。为了探索异质性的来源,我们进行了亚组分析(PROSPERO: CRD42024543107)。共发现1722篇文章,删除重复记录后筛选出1185篇。有26个人工智能模型/群体的20项研究符合纳入标准,包括11,950名参与者。单因素荟萃分析显示,PE检测的总敏感性为91.5% (95% CI 85.5-95.2),特异性为84.3 (95% CI 74.9-90.6)。此外,在二元sROC中,曲线下的池面积(pooled area under the curve, AUC)为0.923 out of 1,表明AI算法在PE检测方面具有非常高的准确性。此外,亚组荟萃分析显示地理区域是异质性的潜在来源,其中亚洲文章亚组的敏感性和特异性I2分别为60%和6.9%。研究结果强调了人工智能在准确诊断PE方面的重要作用,同时也强调了进一步研究以解决区域差异和提高普遍性的必要性。