Postural Instability in Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease: Determination of VEP, BAER, and SSEP Cutoff Values for an Early Screening of Fall.

Q3 Medicine
Joydeep Mukherjee, Manoj K Roy, Jasodhara Chaudhuri, Amar K Misra, Kartik C Ghosh, Mrinal K Roy
{"title":"Postural Instability in Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease: Determination of VEP, BAER, and SSEP Cutoff Values for an Early Screening of Fall.","authors":"Joydeep Mukherjee, Manoj K Roy, Jasodhara Chaudhuri, Amar K Misra, Kartik C Ghosh, Mrinal K Roy","doi":"10.59556/japi.73.1166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds and aims: </strong>Idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) patients had progressively increased slowness, rest tremors, rigidity, and postural instability (PI). Postural stability depends on sensory inputs from visual, auditory, and somatosensory modalities. We tried to find important cutoff values of visual evoked potential (VEP), brainstem auditory evoked response (BAER), and short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) for determining postural stability in IPD patients.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>About 50 IPD patients were recruited in a cross-sectional observational study. A pull test was used to determine postural stability. Patients were subgrouped into tremor dominant (TD variant) (<i>n</i> = 37) and PI and gait disorder (PIGD) (<i>n</i> = 13). We generated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to classify patients into posturally stable and unstable and measured VEP, BAER, and SSEP cutoff values. The area under the curve (AUC) >0.8 was taken as significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant VEP N75, P100, and N145 cutoff values were noted bilaterally in IPD and its subgroups (TD and PIGD). Except for wave I, the latency of all other BAER waves showed significant cutoff values bilaterally in IPD and subgroups (TD and PIGD). Most BAER cutoff values in the IPD and TD subgroups reached 100% specificity. No significant SSEP values were noted.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Many significant VEP and BAER parameters with good sensitivity and specificity would guide clinicians in predicting PI and falls in IPD. The TD had lower BAER latency cutoff values than the PIGD. The postural stability of the TD subgroup was more dependent on the vestibular sensory input than that of the PIGD subgroup. Less vestibular compensatory support in PIGD led to a more severe phenotype than in TD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found many evoked potential significant cutoff values determining postural stability in IPD and its subgroups (TD and PIGD). Lesser vestibular compensatory support in PIGD led to a more severe phenotype than in TD.</p>","PeriodicalId":22693,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","volume":"73 9","pages":"28-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59556/japi.73.1166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds and aims: Idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) patients had progressively increased slowness, rest tremors, rigidity, and postural instability (PI). Postural stability depends on sensory inputs from visual, auditory, and somatosensory modalities. We tried to find important cutoff values of visual evoked potential (VEP), brainstem auditory evoked response (BAER), and short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) for determining postural stability in IPD patients.

Methodology: About 50 IPD patients were recruited in a cross-sectional observational study. A pull test was used to determine postural stability. Patients were subgrouped into tremor dominant (TD variant) (n = 37) and PI and gait disorder (PIGD) (n = 13). We generated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to classify patients into posturally stable and unstable and measured VEP, BAER, and SSEP cutoff values. The area under the curve (AUC) >0.8 was taken as significant.

Results: Significant VEP N75, P100, and N145 cutoff values were noted bilaterally in IPD and its subgroups (TD and PIGD). Except for wave I, the latency of all other BAER waves showed significant cutoff values bilaterally in IPD and subgroups (TD and PIGD). Most BAER cutoff values in the IPD and TD subgroups reached 100% specificity. No significant SSEP values were noted.

Discussion: Many significant VEP and BAER parameters with good sensitivity and specificity would guide clinicians in predicting PI and falls in IPD. The TD had lower BAER latency cutoff values than the PIGD. The postural stability of the TD subgroup was more dependent on the vestibular sensory input than that of the PIGD subgroup. Less vestibular compensatory support in PIGD led to a more severe phenotype than in TD.

Conclusion: We found many evoked potential significant cutoff values determining postural stability in IPD and its subgroups (TD and PIGD). Lesser vestibular compensatory support in PIGD led to a more severe phenotype than in TD.

特发性帕金森病的体位不稳定:VEP、BAER和SSEP临界值对早期跌倒筛查的影响
背景和目的:特发性帕金森病(IPD)患者有逐渐增加的迟缓、静止震颤、僵硬和姿势不稳定(PI)。体位稳定性取决于来自视觉、听觉和体感的感觉输入。我们试图找到视觉诱发电位(VEP)、脑干听觉诱发反应(BAER)和短潜伏期体感诱发电位(SSEP)的重要截止值,以确定IPD患者的姿势稳定性。方法:在一项横断面观察性研究中招募了约50名IPD患者。拉力试验用于确定姿势稳定性。患者被分为震颤显性(TD变体)(n = 37)和PI和步态障碍(PIGD) (n = 13)。我们生成受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,将患者分为姿势稳定和不稳定两类,并测量VEP、BAER和SSEP截止值。曲线下面积(AUC) > .8为显著值。结果:在IPD及其亚组(TD和PIGD)中,VEP N75、P100和N145的双侧临界值显著。除I波外,所有其他BAER波的潜伏期在IPD和亚组(TD和PIGD)中均呈显著的双侧截止值。在IPD和TD亚组中,大多数BAER临界值达到100%特异性。未发现显著的SSEP值。讨论:许多重要的VEP和BAER参数具有良好的敏感性和特异性,可以指导临床医生预测IPD的PI和下降。与PIGD相比,TD具有更低的BAER延迟截止值。与PIGD亚组相比,TD亚组的体位稳定性更依赖于前庭感觉输入。PIGD中前庭代偿支持的减少导致比TD更严重的表型。结论:我们发现IPD及其亚组(TD和PIGD)的姿势稳定性有许多诱发电位显著截止值。PIGD的前庭代偿支持较少导致比TD更严重的表型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
509
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信