Incidence and Pattern of Transfusion Reactions and its Association with Blood and its Components in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Q3 Medicine
Sonia Gupta, Rajesh Kumar, Shruti Kakkar
{"title":"Incidence and Pattern of Transfusion Reactions and its Association with Blood and its Components in a Tertiary Care Hospital.","authors":"Sonia Gupta, Rajesh Kumar, Shruti Kakkar","doi":"10.59556/japi.73.1081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Transfusion medicine has made substantial progress in research, and blood transfusions are now safer than ever before. Still, the inherent risk of transfusion reactions (TRs) continues with transfusion of blood and blood components. The study was designed to analyze the incidence and nature of TRs reported in the blood center.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review of all TRs reported to the blood center was retrieved from incident reporting forms from January 2020 to December 2022. All acute transfusion reactions (ATRs) were tabulated and analyzed by the blood transfusion officer and classified according to National Blood Transfusion guidelines. Data were described in terms of range, mean ± standard deviation (± SD), median (IQR), frequencies (number of cases), and relative frequencies (percentages), as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,65,121 blood and blood components were issued, and ATRs reported were 296 (0.18%). The median (IQR) age of the patient was 45-60, with M:F of 1.3:1. Febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTR) 151 (51%) were the most common ATRs, followed by allergic TRs 111 (37.5%). The estimated risk of transfusion reaction per 1,000 units was highest with whole blood (WB) 3.84 (<i>p</i> = 0.038), followed by packed red blood cells (PRBCs) 2.85 (<i>p</i> = 0.001), and single donor platelet (SDP) 1.47 (<i>p</i> = 0.571). The most common symptoms observed were fever 31.8%, followed by chills 28.7%, and rashes 27.4%. FNHTR (27/151) 17.8% were reported most frequently from gastroenterology, allergic (26/111) 23.4% from emergency, and delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions (DHTR) (9/9) 100% from thalassemia day care center (<i>p</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The overall incidence of TRs was 0.18%. The incidence of actual TRs remains underestimated due to lack of awareness regarding TRs among healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":22693,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","volume":"73 8","pages":"35-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59556/japi.73.1081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Transfusion medicine has made substantial progress in research, and blood transfusions are now safer than ever before. Still, the inherent risk of transfusion reactions (TRs) continues with transfusion of blood and blood components. The study was designed to analyze the incidence and nature of TRs reported in the blood center.

Materials and methods: A retrospective review of all TRs reported to the blood center was retrieved from incident reporting forms from January 2020 to December 2022. All acute transfusion reactions (ATRs) were tabulated and analyzed by the blood transfusion officer and classified according to National Blood Transfusion guidelines. Data were described in terms of range, mean ± standard deviation (± SD), median (IQR), frequencies (number of cases), and relative frequencies (percentages), as appropriate.

Results: A total of 1,65,121 blood and blood components were issued, and ATRs reported were 296 (0.18%). The median (IQR) age of the patient was 45-60, with M:F of 1.3:1. Febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTR) 151 (51%) were the most common ATRs, followed by allergic TRs 111 (37.5%). The estimated risk of transfusion reaction per 1,000 units was highest with whole blood (WB) 3.84 (p = 0.038), followed by packed red blood cells (PRBCs) 2.85 (p = 0.001), and single donor platelet (SDP) 1.47 (p = 0.571). The most common symptoms observed were fever 31.8%, followed by chills 28.7%, and rashes 27.4%. FNHTR (27/151) 17.8% were reported most frequently from gastroenterology, allergic (26/111) 23.4% from emergency, and delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions (DHTR) (9/9) 100% from thalassemia day care center (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: The overall incidence of TRs was 0.18%. The incidence of actual TRs remains underestimated due to lack of awareness regarding TRs among healthcare professionals.

某三级医院输血反应的发生率和模式及其与血液及其成分的关系
目的:输血医学在研究方面取得了实质性进展,输血比以往任何时候都更安全。尽管如此,输血反应(TRs)的固有风险在血液和血液成分的输血中继续存在。本研究旨在分析血液中心报告的TRs的发生率和性质。材料和方法:对从2020年1月至2022年12月向血液中心报告的所有TRs进行回顾性分析。所有急性输血反应(ATRs)由输血官员制表和分析,并根据国家输血指南进行分类。根据需要,用范围、平均±标准差(±SD)、中位数(IQR)、频率(病例数)和相对频率(百分比)来描述数据。结果:共发放血液及血液成分165,121份,报告atr 296份(0.18%)。患者的中位年龄(IQR)为45-60岁,M:F为1.3:1。发热性非溶血性输血反应(FNHTR) 151例(51%)是最常见的atr,其次是过敏性TRs 111例(37.5%)。每1000单位输血反应的估计风险最高的是全血(WB) 3.84 (p = 0.038),其次是填充红细胞(prbc) 2.85 (p = 0.001),单一供体血小板(SDP) 1.47 (p = 0.571)。最常见的症状为发热(31.8%)、寒战(28.7%)和皮疹(27.4%)。FNHTR(27/151)在胃肠科报告最多(17.8%),过敏反应(26/111)在急诊报告最多(23.4%),迟发性溶血性输血反应(DHTR)(9/9)在地中海贫血日托中心报告最多(p = 0.001)。结论:总TRs发生率为0.18%。由于卫生保健专业人员缺乏对TRs的认识,实际TRs的发生率仍然被低估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
509
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信