The skin sensitization prediction model: an algorithm for real-world prediction of skin sensitization risk and minimization of human sensitization testing.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Ladan Fakhrzadeh, Otto Mills, Jim Bowman, Michael J Cork, Alain Khaiat, James A McGuire, Teginder Singh, Evren Atillasoy
{"title":"The skin sensitization prediction model: an algorithm for real-world prediction of skin sensitization risk and minimization of human sensitization testing.","authors":"Ladan Fakhrzadeh, Otto Mills, Jim Bowman, Michael J Cork, Alain Khaiat, James A McGuire, Teginder Singh, Evren Atillasoy","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Skin sensitization testing to ensure the safety of skincare products for public consumption has largely relied on human repeat insult patch test (HRIPT). The desire to minimize reliance on HRIPT has prompted a search for alternative methods to assess the sensitization risk of consumer products to inform decision-making about their suitability before being brought to market. The novel Skin Sensitization Prediction Model (SSPM) is a methodology that draws upon a database consisting of more than 20 years of historical HRIPT data pertaining to 1,274 unique product formulations, comprising 1,226 common ingredients, for which HRIPT testing has been performed on 203,640 human subjects. The SSPM sets modifiable thresholds for each individual ingredient of a proposed formulation and for the formulation as a whole, applying risk calculations based on dosage density, potential for skin occlusion, potential for skin barrier impairment, and potential effects on immune-primed skin. Tabulations of a formulation's risk characteristics allow for a numerical risk calculation that is compared to the preset thresholds to determine whether the product may continue its development or should be reformulated or discontinued. This methodology points to a new model for sensitization testing for a wide array of products without recourse to in vivo testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"105941"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105941","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Skin sensitization testing to ensure the safety of skincare products for public consumption has largely relied on human repeat insult patch test (HRIPT). The desire to minimize reliance on HRIPT has prompted a search for alternative methods to assess the sensitization risk of consumer products to inform decision-making about their suitability before being brought to market. The novel Skin Sensitization Prediction Model (SSPM) is a methodology that draws upon a database consisting of more than 20 years of historical HRIPT data pertaining to 1,274 unique product formulations, comprising 1,226 common ingredients, for which HRIPT testing has been performed on 203,640 human subjects. The SSPM sets modifiable thresholds for each individual ingredient of a proposed formulation and for the formulation as a whole, applying risk calculations based on dosage density, potential for skin occlusion, potential for skin barrier impairment, and potential effects on immune-primed skin. Tabulations of a formulation's risk characteristics allow for a numerical risk calculation that is compared to the preset thresholds to determine whether the product may continue its development or should be reformulated or discontinued. This methodology points to a new model for sensitization testing for a wide array of products without recourse to in vivo testing.

皮肤致敏预测模型:一种用于真实世界皮肤致敏风险预测和人类致敏试验最小化的算法。
为了确保公众消费护肤品的安全性,皮肤致敏试验在很大程度上依赖于人体重复损伤斑贴试验(HRIPT)。为了尽量减少对HRIPT的依赖,人们开始寻找其他方法来评估消费品的致敏风险,以便在将其推向市场之前就其适用性向决策部门提供信息。新的皮肤致敏预测模型(SSPM)是一种方法,它利用了一个数据库,该数据库由20多年的历史HRIPT数据组成,涉及1,274种独特的产品配方,包括1,226种常见成分,为此HRIPT测试已在203,640名人类受试者中进行。SSPM为建议配方的每个成分和整个配方设置可修改的阈值,应用基于剂量密度的风险计算,潜在的皮肤闭塞,潜在的皮肤屏障损伤,以及对免疫启动皮肤的潜在影响。配方的风险特征表允许进行数值风险计算,将其与预设阈值进行比较,以确定产品是否可以继续开发或应该重新配制或停产。这种方法指出了一种新的模型,用于广泛的产品敏化测试,而不依赖于体内测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health. Types of peer-reviewed articles published: -Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to: 1.Factors influencing human sensitivity 2.Exposure science related to risk assessment 3.Alternative toxicological test methods 4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations 5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies 6.Read-across methods and evaluations -Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues -Letters to the Editor -Guest Editorials (by Invitation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信