Blood Biomarkers of Fibrosis as Alternatives to FibroScan® in Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Fatty Liver Disease: A Single-center Comparative Analysis.

Q3 Medicine
Abhinav Gupta, Ranjana Duggal, Deepanjali Gupta, Anil K Gupta
{"title":"Blood Biomarkers of Fibrosis as Alternatives to FibroScan<sup>®</sup> in Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Fatty Liver Disease: A Single-center Comparative Analysis.","authors":"Abhinav Gupta, Ranjana Duggal, Deepanjali Gupta, Anil K Gupta","doi":"10.59556/japi.73.1114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liver fibrosis worsens prognosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). FibroScan® is the most widely used noninvasive tool for evaluating fibrosis, but performing this assessment requires specialized equipment and expertise. This study aimed to assess the potential of four additional noninvasive techniques for diagnosing liver fibrosis that rely on routine laboratory measurements, that is, fibrosis (FIB)-4 score, FIB-5 score, aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine transaminase (ALT) ratio, and the aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was performed following a cross-sectional observational design at a tertiary care hospital in India. The study included adult patients who were observed to have elevated serum AST and ALT levels and fatty deposition on ultrasonography, as these indicate a risk for liver fibrosis, that is, MAFLD or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis. The specificity and sensitivity of FIB-4, FIB-5, APRI, and AST/ALT ratio were compared with those of FibroScan® (FibroScan® 502, Echosens, Paris, France).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the alternative noninvasive methods, FIB-4 had the highest specificity (78%) and sensitivity (85%) that were closest to the specificity (88%) and sensitivity (92%) of FibroScan®. FIB-5 and APRI demonstrated moderate sensitivity (80% and 76%, respectively) and specificity (75 and 70%, respectively). The AST/ALT ratio had relatively poor diagnostic capability, with a specificity of 60% and sensitivity of 65%. The area under the curve (AUC) for the methods being compared was 0.82 (FIB-4), 0.79 (FIB-5), 0.74 (APRI), and 0.65 (AST/ALT ratio).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FibroScan® is the preferred option for evaluating liver fibrosis in patients with MAFLD. However, when unavailable, FIB-4 may be the next most reliable alternative for identifying or excluding advanced fibrosis. Other methods (FIB-5, APRI, and AST/ALT) are less accurate.</p>","PeriodicalId":22693,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","volume":"73 9","pages":"e1-e4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59556/japi.73.1114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Liver fibrosis worsens prognosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). FibroScan® is the most widely used noninvasive tool for evaluating fibrosis, but performing this assessment requires specialized equipment and expertise. This study aimed to assess the potential of four additional noninvasive techniques for diagnosing liver fibrosis that rely on routine laboratory measurements, that is, fibrosis (FIB)-4 score, FIB-5 score, aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine transaminase (ALT) ratio, and the aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI).

Methods: This study was performed following a cross-sectional observational design at a tertiary care hospital in India. The study included adult patients who were observed to have elevated serum AST and ALT levels and fatty deposition on ultrasonography, as these indicate a risk for liver fibrosis, that is, MAFLD or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis. The specificity and sensitivity of FIB-4, FIB-5, APRI, and AST/ALT ratio were compared with those of FibroScan® (FibroScan® 502, Echosens, Paris, France).

Results: Among the alternative noninvasive methods, FIB-4 had the highest specificity (78%) and sensitivity (85%) that were closest to the specificity (88%) and sensitivity (92%) of FibroScan®. FIB-5 and APRI demonstrated moderate sensitivity (80% and 76%, respectively) and specificity (75 and 70%, respectively). The AST/ALT ratio had relatively poor diagnostic capability, with a specificity of 60% and sensitivity of 65%. The area under the curve (AUC) for the methods being compared was 0.82 (FIB-4), 0.79 (FIB-5), 0.74 (APRI), and 0.65 (AST/ALT ratio).

Conclusion: FibroScan® is the preferred option for evaluating liver fibrosis in patients with MAFLD. However, when unavailable, FIB-4 may be the next most reliable alternative for identifying or excluding advanced fibrosis. Other methods (FIB-5, APRI, and AST/ALT) are less accurate.

在代谢功能障碍相关的脂肪肝疾病中,纤维化的血液生物标志物替代FibroScan®:一项单中心比较分析
背景:肝纤维化恶化代谢功能障碍相关脂肪肝(MAFLD)的预后。FibroScan®是最广泛使用的非侵入性纤维化评估工具,但进行这种评估需要专门的设备和专业知识。本研究旨在评估依赖常规实验室测量的另外四种诊断肝纤维化的无创技术的潜力,即纤维化(FIB)-4评分、FIB-5评分、天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)/丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)比率和天冬氨酸转氨酶与血小板比率指数(APRI)。方法:本研究采用横断面观察设计,在印度一家三级医院进行。该研究纳入了在超声检查中观察到血清AST和ALT水平升高以及脂肪沉积的成年患者,因为这些表明有肝纤维化的风险,即MAFLD或代谢功能障碍相关的脂肪性肝炎。比较FIB-4、FIB-5、APRI和AST/ALT比值与FibroScan®(FibroScan®502,Echosens, Paris, France)的特异性和敏感性。结果:在可选的无创方法中,FIB-4具有最高的特异性(78%)和敏感性(85%),最接近FibroScan®的特异性(88%)和敏感性(92%)。FIB-5和APRI表现出中等的敏感性(分别为80%和76%)和特异性(分别为75%和70%)。AST/ALT诊断能力较差,特异性为60%,敏感性为65%。比较方法的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.82 (FIB-4)、0.79 (FIB-5)、0.74 (APRI)和0.65 (AST/ALT比值)。结论:FibroScan®是评估MAFLD患者肝纤维化的首选方法。然而,当无法获得时,FIB-4可能是鉴别或排除晚期纤维化的下一个最可靠的选择。其他方法(FIB-5、APRI和AST/ALT)准确性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
509
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信