Cognitive impairment assessment using eye-tracking: multilevel saccade paradigms with differential analysis and attention-based neural networks.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Jia Zhao, Haoyu Tian, Yahan Wang, Xiangqing Xu, Xin Ma, Lizhou Fan
{"title":"Cognitive impairment assessment using eye-tracking: multilevel saccade paradigms with differential analysis and attention-based neural networks.","authors":"Jia Zhao, Haoyu Tian, Yahan Wang, Xiangqing Xu, Xin Ma, Lizhou Fan","doi":"10.1088/1361-6579/ae06ed","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. The accurate assessment of cognitive impairment plays a vital role in more targeted treatments for Dementia. Eye movement analysis is a non-invasive and objective method that offers fine-grained insight into cognitive functioning, complementing conventional screening tools. However, single-task eye-tracking paradigms and simplistic analysis methods limit the potential for comprehensive and fine-grained assessment of cognitive impairment. To address this limitation, we propose a multilevel saccade paradigm combined with differential analysis and an attention-based neural network to enhance eye-tracking-based cognitive impairment assessment.<i>Approach</i>. Firstly, a set of saccade-based paradigms with graded difficulty levels is developed, including prosaccade, antisaccade, and random pro-/antisaccade paradigms. Each paradigm incorporates eye movement assessments in both horizontal and vertical directions. Secondly, we recruit 90 subjects for eye-tracking assessments to build a large-scale dataset. The subjects consisted of 36 healthy young controls, 15 healthy elderly controls, 23 individuals with mild cognitive impairment, and 16 individuals with dementia. Each subject completed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Third, the Mann-Whitney<i>U</i>test is employed to identify eye movement features that show significant differences across the four groups. Correlation analysis with MoCA scores further validated the effectiveness of these eye movement features in distinguishing cognitive impairment. Finally, XGBoost is employed to perform classification and to validate the effectiveness of the eye movement feature selection scheme derived from the difficulty-graded saccade paradigms. An attention-based neural network is also integrated to enhance classification accuracy and improve feature selection by identifying the most informative eye movement features.<i>Main results</i>. The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.94, a classification accuracy of 0.80, and a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.73. Among all features extracted from the different saccade paradigms, the time to first correct AOI and saccade latency parameters from the random pro-antisaccade paradigm demonstrate the highest contribution to classification performance.<i>Significance</i>. By integrating graded saccade paradigms with statistical analysis and attention neural network, this study enhances the granularity and accuracy of eye-tracking-based cognitive assessment, offering a scalable and non-invasive tool for early detection and monitoring of cognitive decline.</p>","PeriodicalId":20047,"journal":{"name":"Physiological measurement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological measurement","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ae06ed","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. The accurate assessment of cognitive impairment plays a vital role in more targeted treatments for Dementia. Eye movement analysis is a non-invasive and objective method that offers fine-grained insight into cognitive functioning, complementing conventional screening tools. However, single-task eye-tracking paradigms and simplistic analysis methods limit the potential for comprehensive and fine-grained assessment of cognitive impairment. To address this limitation, we propose a multilevel saccade paradigm combined with differential analysis and an attention-based neural network to enhance eye-tracking-based cognitive impairment assessment.Approach. Firstly, a set of saccade-based paradigms with graded difficulty levels is developed, including prosaccade, antisaccade, and random pro-/antisaccade paradigms. Each paradigm incorporates eye movement assessments in both horizontal and vertical directions. Secondly, we recruit 90 subjects for eye-tracking assessments to build a large-scale dataset. The subjects consisted of 36 healthy young controls, 15 healthy elderly controls, 23 individuals with mild cognitive impairment, and 16 individuals with dementia. Each subject completed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Third, the Mann-WhitneyUtest is employed to identify eye movement features that show significant differences across the four groups. Correlation analysis with MoCA scores further validated the effectiveness of these eye movement features in distinguishing cognitive impairment. Finally, XGBoost is employed to perform classification and to validate the effectiveness of the eye movement feature selection scheme derived from the difficulty-graded saccade paradigms. An attention-based neural network is also integrated to enhance classification accuracy and improve feature selection by identifying the most informative eye movement features.Main results. The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.94, a classification accuracy of 0.80, and a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.73. Among all features extracted from the different saccade paradigms, the time to first correct AOI and saccade latency parameters from the random pro-antisaccade paradigm demonstrate the highest contribution to classification performance.Significance. By integrating graded saccade paradigms with statistical analysis and attention neural network, this study enhances the granularity and accuracy of eye-tracking-based cognitive assessment, offering a scalable and non-invasive tool for early detection and monitoring of cognitive decline.

用眼动追踪评估认知障碍:基于差异分析和基于注意的神经网络的多层次扫视范式。
目的:准确评估认知功能障碍对更有针对性地治疗痴呆症至关重要。眼动分析是一种非侵入性和客观的方法,提供了对认知功能的细致洞察,补充了传统的筛查工具。然而,单任务眼动追踪范式和简单的分析方法限制了对认知障碍进行全面和细致评估的潜力。为了解决这一限制,我们提出了一种结合差分分析和基于注意力的神经网络的多层次扫视范式,以增强基于眼动追踪的认知障碍评估方法。首先,建立了一套难度分级的基于扫视的范式,包括顺扫视范式、反扫视范式和随机的支持反扫视范式。每个范例都包含水平和垂直方向的眼动评估。其次,我们招募90名受试者进行眼动追踪评估,构建大规模数据集。研究对象包括36名健康的年轻人、15名健康的老年人、23名轻度认知障碍患者和16名痴呆症患者。每位受试者完成蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)。第三,采用Mann-Whitney U检验来识别四组之间存在显著差异的眼动特征。与MoCA评分的相关分析进一步验证了这些眼动特征在识别认知障碍方面的有效性。最后,利用XGBoost进行分类,并验证了基于难度分级扫视范式的眼动特征选择方案的有效性。还集成了基于注意力的神经网络,通过识别最具信息量的眼动特征来提高分类精度和改进特征选择。 ;该模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为0.94,分类精度为0.80,马修斯相关系数(MCC)为0.73。在从不同的扫视范式提取的所有特征中,从随机的支持反扫视范式中首次纠正AOI和扫视延迟参数的时间对分类性能的贡献最大。 ;本研究通过将分级扫视范式与统计分析和注意神经网络相结合,提高了基于眼动追踪的认知评估的粒度和准确性,为认知衰退的早期检测和监测提供了一种可扩展和非侵入性的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiological measurement
Physiological measurement 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
124
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Physiological Measurement publishes papers about the quantitative assessment and visualization of physiological function in clinical research and practice, with an emphasis on the development of new methods of measurement and their validation. Papers are published on topics including: applied physiology in illness and health electrical bioimpedance, optical and acoustic measurement techniques advanced methods of time series and other data analysis biomedical and clinical engineering in-patient and ambulatory monitoring point-of-care technologies novel clinical measurements of cardiovascular, neurological, and musculoskeletal systems. measurements in molecular, cellular and organ physiology and electrophysiology physiological modeling and simulation novel biomedical sensors, instruments, devices and systems measurement standards and guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信