Anne-Christine Zygmunt, Elif Yilmaz, Madelaine Hettler, Michael Ghadimi, Florian Bösch, Jens Jakob
{"title":"Technical aspects in sarcoma surgery - a surgical survey among surgeons at sarcoma centers in Germany and Switzerland.","authors":"Anne-Christine Zygmunt, Elif Yilmaz, Madelaine Hettler, Michael Ghadimi, Florian Bösch, Jens Jakob","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03854-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Surgery is a substantial pillar of extremity sarcoma treatment. There are no standardized, evidence-based strategies to perform a wide R0 resection which is recommended by international and German guidelines. The aim of this study was to use a standardized questionnaire combined with a semi-structured interview to survey the reality of surgical care in German and Swiss sarcoma centers and establish a rationale for future prospective studies to improve postoperative outcome and oncological quality in extremity sarcoma surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The questionnaire was developed based on a real case of a 32-year-old female patient with a locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma of the proximal thigh. We invited surgeons who were currently treating patients with extremity sarcomas at German and Swiss sarcoma centers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>15 of 24 (62.5%) invited surgeons participated. Participants had a broad type of surgical training and specialization (e.g. general surgery n = 5, special visceral surgery n = 4, orthopedics and trauma surgery n = 8, vascular surgery n = 2, plastic surgery n = 3). Significant differences (agreement of less than 50%) were found in the planned resection margin at the skin level, the resection planes in other tissues and strategies towards critical structures such as nerves and vessels. Similarities (agreement above 80%) were found in regard to the placement of suction drains and subcutaneous closure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current survey shows relevant differences in surgical techniques among sarcoma surgeons at certified sarcoma centers. It is unclear to what extent these differences influence surgical morbidity and oncological outcome. Further studies should be planned to optimize and standardize sarcoma surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"272"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12441070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03854-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Surgery is a substantial pillar of extremity sarcoma treatment. There are no standardized, evidence-based strategies to perform a wide R0 resection which is recommended by international and German guidelines. The aim of this study was to use a standardized questionnaire combined with a semi-structured interview to survey the reality of surgical care in German and Swiss sarcoma centers and establish a rationale for future prospective studies to improve postoperative outcome and oncological quality in extremity sarcoma surgery.
Methods: The questionnaire was developed based on a real case of a 32-year-old female patient with a locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma of the proximal thigh. We invited surgeons who were currently treating patients with extremity sarcomas at German and Swiss sarcoma centers.
Results: 15 of 24 (62.5%) invited surgeons participated. Participants had a broad type of surgical training and specialization (e.g. general surgery n = 5, special visceral surgery n = 4, orthopedics and trauma surgery n = 8, vascular surgery n = 2, plastic surgery n = 3). Significant differences (agreement of less than 50%) were found in the planned resection margin at the skin level, the resection planes in other tissues and strategies towards critical structures such as nerves and vessels. Similarities (agreement above 80%) were found in regard to the placement of suction drains and subcutaneous closure.
Conclusion: The current survey shows relevant differences in surgical techniques among sarcoma surgeons at certified sarcoma centers. It is unclear to what extent these differences influence surgical morbidity and oncological outcome. Further studies should be planned to optimize and standardize sarcoma surgery.
期刊介绍:
Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.