Efficacy and Safety of Linaclotide as an Adjunct to Polyethylene Glycol in Bowel Preparation: A Meta-Analysis

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Muhammad Shahzil, Fariha Hasan, Ali Akram Qureshi, Zainab Jamil, Talha Kashif, Muhammad Saad Faisal, Taha Bin Arif, Ammad Javaid Chaudhary, Umer Farooq, Hassam Ali, John M. Levenick
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Linaclotide as an Adjunct to Polyethylene Glycol in Bowel Preparation: A Meta-Analysis","authors":"Muhammad Shahzil,&nbsp;Fariha Hasan,&nbsp;Ali Akram Qureshi,&nbsp;Zainab Jamil,&nbsp;Talha Kashif,&nbsp;Muhammad Saad Faisal,&nbsp;Taha Bin Arif,&nbsp;Ammad Javaid Chaudhary,&nbsp;Umer Farooq,&nbsp;Hassam Ali,&nbsp;John M. Levenick","doi":"10.1111/1751-2980.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Linaclotide, a guanylyl cyclase-C agonist, may enhance efficacy and tolerability when combined with polyethylene glycol (PEG) for bowel preparation. This meta-analysis evaluated linaclotide plus PEG versus PEG alone for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including adults undergoing colonoscopy that compared linaclotide plus PEG with PEG alone for bowel preparation were identified via database search up to March 2024. Statistical analysis was performed in RevMan Web using random-effects models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eleven RCTs were analyzed. Adequate bowel preparation rate was comparable (risk ratio [RR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98–1.04; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 23%), as was cecal intubation rate (RR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00–1.01). Subgroup analyses showed that compared with 3-L PEG alone, 2-L PEG plus linaclotide was non-inferior, while 3-L PEG plus linaclotide was superior regarding bowel preparation adequacy (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01–1.23) and total Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score (mean difference 0.44, 95% CI 0.04–0.85). Right and left colon BBPS scores were also higher with linaclotide. Polyp detection rate improved significantly in the 3-L PEG plus linaclotide subgroup (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.32–2.40), whereas adenoma detection rate and withdrawal time were comparable. Linaclotide reduced abdominal pain, bloating, nausea, and sleep disturbance, and increased willingness to repeat colonoscopy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Linaclotide with PEG provides comparable overall bowel cleansing to PEG alone while reducing adverse events and improving patient acceptance. Importantly, 2-L PEG plus linaclotide was non-inferior compared with 3-L PEG, whereas 3-L PEG plus linaclotide showed superiority over 3-L PEG alone, supporting its use in low-volume bowel preparation strategies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15564,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digestive Diseases","volume":"26 7-8","pages":"318-333"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1751-2980.70008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1751-2980.70008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Linaclotide, a guanylyl cyclase-C agonist, may enhance efficacy and tolerability when combined with polyethylene glycol (PEG) for bowel preparation. This meta-analysis evaluated linaclotide plus PEG versus PEG alone for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including adults undergoing colonoscopy that compared linaclotide plus PEG with PEG alone for bowel preparation were identified via database search up to March 2024. Statistical analysis was performed in RevMan Web using random-effects models.

Results

Eleven RCTs were analyzed. Adequate bowel preparation rate was comparable (risk ratio [RR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98–1.04; I2 = 23%), as was cecal intubation rate (RR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00–1.01). Subgroup analyses showed that compared with 3-L PEG alone, 2-L PEG plus linaclotide was non-inferior, while 3-L PEG plus linaclotide was superior regarding bowel preparation adequacy (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01–1.23) and total Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score (mean difference 0.44, 95% CI 0.04–0.85). Right and left colon BBPS scores were also higher with linaclotide. Polyp detection rate improved significantly in the 3-L PEG plus linaclotide subgroup (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.32–2.40), whereas adenoma detection rate and withdrawal time were comparable. Linaclotide reduced abdominal pain, bloating, nausea, and sleep disturbance, and increased willingness to repeat colonoscopy.

Conclusions

Linaclotide with PEG provides comparable overall bowel cleansing to PEG alone while reducing adverse events and improving patient acceptance. Importantly, 2-L PEG plus linaclotide was non-inferior compared with 3-L PEG, whereas 3-L PEG plus linaclotide showed superiority over 3-L PEG alone, supporting its use in low-volume bowel preparation strategies.

Abstract Image

利那克洛肽辅助聚乙二醇用于肠道准备的有效性和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
目的:利那氯肽是一种胍基环化酶- c激动剂,与聚乙二醇(PEG)联合用于肠道准备可提高疗效和耐受性。本荟萃分析评估了利那洛肽加聚乙二醇与单独聚乙二醇在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的作用。方法:随机对照试验(rct)包括接受结肠镜检查的成年人,通过数据库检索确定利那洛肽加PEG与单独PEG用于肠道准备的比较,截至2024年3月。采用随机效应模型在RevMan Web中进行统计分析。结果:共分析了11项随机对照试验。充分的肠道准备率(风险比[RR] 1.01, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.98-1.04; I2 = 23%)和盲肠插管率(RR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.01)具有可比性。亚组分析显示,与单独使用3-L PEG相比,2-L PEG加利那洛肽并不差,而3-L PEG加利那洛肽在肠准备充分性(RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.23)和波士顿肠准备量表(BBPS)总评分(平均差异0.44,95% CI 0.04-0.85)方面优于3-L PEG加利那洛肽。利那洛肽组的左、右结肠BBPS评分也较高。3-L聚乙二醇加利那洛肽组息肉检出率显著提高(RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.32-2.40),而腺瘤检出率和停药时间相当。利那氯肽减轻了腹痛、腹胀、恶心和睡眠障碍,并增加了重复结肠镜检查的意愿。结论:与单独使用聚乙二醇相比,利那洛肽联合使用聚乙二醇可提供相当的整体肠道清洁,同时减少不良事件并提高患者接受度。重要的是,与3-L PEG相比,2-L PEG加利那洛肽并不差,而3-L PEG加利那洛肽比单独使用3-L PEG优越,支持其在小容量肠准备策略中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Digestive Diseases
Journal of Digestive Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Digestive Diseases is the official English-language journal of the Chinese Society of Gastroenterology. The journal is published twelve times per year and includes peer-reviewed original papers, review articles and commentaries concerned with research relating to the esophagus, stomach, small intestine, colon, liver, biliary tract and pancreas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信