Association between discharge destination and medium-term mortality in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia after endovascular therapy: results of the DENEB study.
{"title":"Association between discharge destination and medium-term mortality in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia after endovascular therapy: results of the DENEB study.","authors":"Naoki Yoshioka, Takahiro Tokuda, Akiko Tanaka, Shunsuke Kojima, Kohei Yamaguchi, Takashi Yanagiuchi, Kenji Ogata, Tatsuro Takei, Yasuhiro Morita, Tatsuya Nakama, Itsuro Morishima","doi":"10.1007/s00380-025-02599-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Owing to the aging population, patients are increasingly undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT) for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). CLTI onset causes patients to become increasingly frail and less able to perform daily activities, preventing their discharge home. However, the association of discharge destination with clinical backgrounds and outcomes in these patients has not been fully evaluated. In this study, data from 606 patients with CLTI who underwent EVT between March 2021 and December 2023 and survived to discharge were obtained from a multicenter registry (mean age, 74.5 years; 61.4% men). Non-home discharge was defined as transfer to another hospital or nursing home. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of non-home discharge. Mortality rates within two years of discharge were compared between the home and non-home discharge groups. Of the 606 patients, 108 underwent non-home discharge. Multivariate analysis identified mild frailty (odds ratio [OR] 2.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-4.02, p = 0.003), advanced frailty (OR 3.50, 95% CI 1.95-6.28, p < 0.001), a Hemoglobin level < 11 g/dL (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.15-3.02, p = 0.011), and a Wound, Ischemia, and Foot Infection grade 4 (OR 7.27, 95% CI 2.16-24.46, p = 0.001) as significant predictors of non-home discharge. During the two-year follow-up period, 161 patients died. Cumulative all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the non-home discharge group than in the home discharge group (58.6% vs. 33.7%; log-rank p < 0.001). The findings of this study reveal that non-home discharge occurred in one-sixth of patients with CLTI undergoing EVT, and was linked to a more severe clinical status and worse prognosis than home discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":12940,"journal":{"name":"Heart and Vessels","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart and Vessels","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-025-02599-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Owing to the aging population, patients are increasingly undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT) for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). CLTI onset causes patients to become increasingly frail and less able to perform daily activities, preventing their discharge home. However, the association of discharge destination with clinical backgrounds and outcomes in these patients has not been fully evaluated. In this study, data from 606 patients with CLTI who underwent EVT between March 2021 and December 2023 and survived to discharge were obtained from a multicenter registry (mean age, 74.5 years; 61.4% men). Non-home discharge was defined as transfer to another hospital or nursing home. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of non-home discharge. Mortality rates within two years of discharge were compared between the home and non-home discharge groups. Of the 606 patients, 108 underwent non-home discharge. Multivariate analysis identified mild frailty (odds ratio [OR] 2.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-4.02, p = 0.003), advanced frailty (OR 3.50, 95% CI 1.95-6.28, p < 0.001), a Hemoglobin level < 11 g/dL (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.15-3.02, p = 0.011), and a Wound, Ischemia, and Foot Infection grade 4 (OR 7.27, 95% CI 2.16-24.46, p = 0.001) as significant predictors of non-home discharge. During the two-year follow-up period, 161 patients died. Cumulative all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the non-home discharge group than in the home discharge group (58.6% vs. 33.7%; log-rank p < 0.001). The findings of this study reveal that non-home discharge occurred in one-sixth of patients with CLTI undergoing EVT, and was linked to a more severe clinical status and worse prognosis than home discharge.
由于人口老龄化,越来越多的患者接受血管内治疗(EVT)治疗慢性肢体威胁缺血(CLTI)。CLTI发作导致患者变得越来越虚弱,无法进行日常活动,阻止他们出院回家。然而,这些患者的出院目的地与临床背景和预后的关系尚未得到充分评估。在这项研究中,从多中心登记处获得了606名在2021年3月至2023年12月期间接受EVT并存活至出院的CLTI患者的数据(平均年龄74.5岁,61.4%为男性)。非家庭出院被定义为转移到另一家医院或养老院。采用Logistic回归分析确定非居家出院的独立预测因素。比较出院两年内住院组和非住院组的死亡率。在606例患者中,108例是非家庭出院。多因素分析发现,轻度虚弱(优势比[OR] 2.32, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.34-4.02, p = 0.003)、晚期虚弱(OR 3.50, 95% CI 1.95-6.28, p < 0.001)、血红蛋白水平< 11 g/dL (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.15-3.02, p = 0.011)、伤口、缺血和足部感染4级(OR 7.27, 95% CI 2.16-24.46, p = 0.001)是非居家出院的重要预测因素。在两年的随访期间,161名患者死亡。非住家出院组的累积全因死亡率显著高于住家出院组(58.6%比33.7%,log-rank p < 0.001)。本研究结果显示,在接受EVT的CLTI患者中,有六分之一发生了非家庭出院,并且与家庭出院相比,其临床状况更严重,预后更差。
期刊介绍:
Heart and Vessels is an English-language journal that provides a forum of original ideas, excellent methods, and fascinating techniques on cardiovascular disease fields. All papers submitted for publication are evaluated only with regard to scientific quality and relevance to the heart and vessels. Contributions from those engaged in practical medicine, as well as from those involved in basic research, are welcomed.