Evidence for increased background neural noise in migraine with aura: Hyperactive but not hyperresponsive.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Headache Pub Date : 2025-09-16 DOI:10.1111/head.15046
Louise O'Hare, Paul B Hibbard, Arnold J Wilkins
{"title":"Evidence for increased background neural noise in migraine with aura: Hyperactive but not hyperresponsive.","authors":"Louise O'Hare, Paul B Hibbard, Arnold J Wilkins","doi":"10.1111/head.15046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study had two aims: (1) to investigate the contrast gain in migraine and compare it to that in photosensitive epilepsy; (2) to explore any effects of colored spectacles (precision ophthalmic tints [POT]) on contrast gain.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with migraine with aura (MA) typically show high amplitude electrophysiological responses, but poor performance on visual tasks. One possible explanation is increased neural \"noise\" in the visual cortex in MA. \"Noise\" is neural activity that does not carry information about the stimulus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a case-control study of individuals with MA and controls with no family history of migraine, as there is a tendency for migraine to run in families. We measured the steady-state visual evoked potential in response to a sinewave grating (striped pattern) that varied in contrast (appeared to flicker on and off) at 5 and 17 Hz in 15 MA and 15 control participants. The maximum contrast (stimulus intensity) increased progressively from 10% to 90% in nine equal steps. We also measured the effect of colored spectacles (POTs) on the electroencephalogram (EEG) response. The experiment was a mixed factorial design, with one between-participants factor (experimental vs. control group) and two within-participants factors (contrast and lens type [none, POT, or control]). The dependent variables were the steady-state visual evoked potential response, and the background EEG activity. In experiment 2, discomfort judgments on a rating scale of 0-9 from a separate set of 12 MA and 12 control participants were also collected during the EEG session. Data were collected between February 2022 and August 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the faster flicker rate of 17 Hz (appearing on and off 17 times per second), the electrophysiological response of the MA group showed increased background activity (EEG power at frequencies other than the stimulation frequency) (experiment 1: mean for the migraine group = -666.45 dB/Hz, standard error [SE] = 116.69; mean for the control group = -1100.50 dB/Hz, SE = 164.99; coefficient estimate = 434.09, p = 0.016, confidence interval [CI], 82.24-735.94; estimated Cohen's d of 0.94, CI, 0.14-1.73; experiment 2: migraine group mean = -500.01 dB/Hz, SE = 122.99; control group mean = -741.88 dB/Hz, SE = 126.12; coefficient estimate = 265.04, p = 0.049, CI, 1.52-528.56, estimated Cohen's d of 0.95, CI, 0.05-1.84). The increase in EEG power with contrast at the stimulation frequency was similar in both MA and control groups. The MA group experienced more discomfort compared to the control group (median rating for migraine group = 4, interquartile range [IQR] = 4, median rating for control group = 3, IQR = 3, coefficient estimate = 3.58, p = 0.003, CI, 1.18-6.00) and faster flicker (17 Hz) was judged more uncomfortable than slower flicker (5 Hz) by both groups (median rating for 5 Hz = 3, IQR = 3, median rating for 17 Hz = 4, IQR = 4, coefficient estimate = 0.97, p < 0.001, CI, 0.49-1.45). There was no specific reduction in EEG response in the MA group compared to controls with POTs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The increased EEG responses in MA show evidence that in migraine the brain is \"noisier\" compared to controls. As the contrast response was similar in both MA and control groups, this suggests typical contrast gain control, as distinct from the abnormality seen previously in photosensitive epilepsy. The chosen color of POTs can reduce discomfort judgments under some circumstances, although this does not appear to be specific to MA.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.15046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study had two aims: (1) to investigate the contrast gain in migraine and compare it to that in photosensitive epilepsy; (2) to explore any effects of colored spectacles (precision ophthalmic tints [POT]) on contrast gain.

Background: Individuals with migraine with aura (MA) typically show high amplitude electrophysiological responses, but poor performance on visual tasks. One possible explanation is increased neural "noise" in the visual cortex in MA. "Noise" is neural activity that does not carry information about the stimulus.

Methods: This is a case-control study of individuals with MA and controls with no family history of migraine, as there is a tendency for migraine to run in families. We measured the steady-state visual evoked potential in response to a sinewave grating (striped pattern) that varied in contrast (appeared to flicker on and off) at 5 and 17 Hz in 15 MA and 15 control participants. The maximum contrast (stimulus intensity) increased progressively from 10% to 90% in nine equal steps. We also measured the effect of colored spectacles (POTs) on the electroencephalogram (EEG) response. The experiment was a mixed factorial design, with one between-participants factor (experimental vs. control group) and two within-participants factors (contrast and lens type [none, POT, or control]). The dependent variables were the steady-state visual evoked potential response, and the background EEG activity. In experiment 2, discomfort judgments on a rating scale of 0-9 from a separate set of 12 MA and 12 control participants were also collected during the EEG session. Data were collected between February 2022 and August 2024.

Results: At the faster flicker rate of 17 Hz (appearing on and off 17 times per second), the electrophysiological response of the MA group showed increased background activity (EEG power at frequencies other than the stimulation frequency) (experiment 1: mean for the migraine group = -666.45 dB/Hz, standard error [SE] = 116.69; mean for the control group = -1100.50 dB/Hz, SE = 164.99; coefficient estimate = 434.09, p = 0.016, confidence interval [CI], 82.24-735.94; estimated Cohen's d of 0.94, CI, 0.14-1.73; experiment 2: migraine group mean = -500.01 dB/Hz, SE = 122.99; control group mean = -741.88 dB/Hz, SE = 126.12; coefficient estimate = 265.04, p = 0.049, CI, 1.52-528.56, estimated Cohen's d of 0.95, CI, 0.05-1.84). The increase in EEG power with contrast at the stimulation frequency was similar in both MA and control groups. The MA group experienced more discomfort compared to the control group (median rating for migraine group = 4, interquartile range [IQR] = 4, median rating for control group = 3, IQR = 3, coefficient estimate = 3.58, p = 0.003, CI, 1.18-6.00) and faster flicker (17 Hz) was judged more uncomfortable than slower flicker (5 Hz) by both groups (median rating for 5 Hz = 3, IQR = 3, median rating for 17 Hz = 4, IQR = 4, coefficient estimate = 0.97, p < 0.001, CI, 0.49-1.45). There was no specific reduction in EEG response in the MA group compared to controls with POTs.

Conclusions: The increased EEG responses in MA show evidence that in migraine the brain is "noisier" compared to controls. As the contrast response was similar in both MA and control groups, this suggests typical contrast gain control, as distinct from the abnormality seen previously in photosensitive epilepsy. The chosen color of POTs can reduce discomfort judgments under some circumstances, although this does not appear to be specific to MA.

先兆偏头痛背景神经噪声增加的证据:过度活跃但不过度反应。
目的:本研究有两个目的:(1)研究偏头痛的对比增益,并与光敏性癫痫的对比增益进行比较;(2)探讨有色眼镜(精密眼镜[POT])对对比度增益的影响。背景:先兆偏头痛患者通常表现出高幅度的电生理反应,但在视觉任务上表现不佳。一种可能的解释是MA患者视觉皮层的神经“噪音”增加。“噪音”是一种不携带刺激信息的神经活动。方法:这是一项MA患者和没有偏头痛家族史的对照组的病例对照研究,因为偏头痛有家族史的趋势。我们测量了稳态视觉诱发电位对正弦波光栅(条纹图案)的响应,在15 MA和15对照参与者中,正弦波光栅在5和17 Hz的对比度变化(似乎闪烁开和关)。最大对比度(刺激强度)在九个相等的步骤中从10%逐渐增加到90%。我们还测量了彩色眼镜(POTs)对脑电图(EEG)反应的影响。该实验采用混合因子设计,有一个参与者间因素(实验组与对照组)和两个参与者内因素(对比度和镜片类型[无,POT或对照组])。因变量为稳态视觉诱发电位反应和背景脑电活动。在实验2中,还收集了12名MA和12名对照参与者在EEG会话期间的不适判断量表(0-9)。数据收集于2022年2月至2024年8月。结果:在更快的闪烁频率为17 Hz(每秒出现17次)时,MA组的电生理反应显示出背景活动(非刺激频率下的脑电功率)的增加(实验1:偏头痛组平均值= -666.45 dB/Hz,标准误差[SE] = 116.69;对照组平均值= - 11000.50 dB/Hz, SE = 164.99;系数估计= 434.09,p = 0.016,置信区间[CI], 82.24-735.94;估计Cohen’s d为0.94,CI为0.14-1.73;实验2:偏头痛组平均值= -500.01 dB/Hz, SE = 122.99;对照组平均值= -741.88 dB/Hz, SE = 126.12;系数估计= 265.04,p = 0.049, CI为1.52 ~ 528.56,估计Cohen’s d为0.95,CI为0.05 ~ 1.84)。MA组和对照组在刺激频率下脑电功率的增加与对照相似。马集团经历更多的不适而对照组(平均评级为偏头痛组= 4,四分位范围(差)= 4,对照组平均评级= 3,差= 3,估计系数= 3.58,p = 0.003, CI, 1.18 - -6.00)和更快的闪烁(Hz) 17日被认为比缓慢闪烁不舒服(5赫兹)由两组(平均评级5赫兹= 3,差= 3,平均评级17赫兹= 4,差= 4,估计系数= 0.97,p结论:脑电图反应增加表明偏头痛患者的大脑比对照组更“嘈杂”。由于MA组和对照组的对比反应相似,这表明典型的对比增益控制,与先前在光敏性癫痫中看到的异常不同。在某些情况下,锅的颜色选择可以减少不适的判断,尽管这似乎不是MA所特有的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Headache
Headache 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Headache publishes original articles on all aspects of head and face pain including communications on clinical and basic research, diagnosis and management, epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of primary and secondary headaches, cranial neuralgias, and pains referred to the head and face. Monthly issues feature case reports, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, and news items regarding AHS plus medicolegal and socioeconomic aspects of head pain. This is the official journal of the American Headache Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信