Not all anti-parietal cell antibody tests are equal for diagnosing pernicious anemia.

Abstract

Objectives: Pernicious anemia (PA) is a common cause of vitamin B12 deficiency and requires a robust diagnosis to guide lifelong treatment. Anti-parietal cell antibodies (APCA) are frequently used as a diagnostic marker, but their poor specificity raises concerns about overdiagnosis, particularly in patients lacking the more specific but less sensitive anti-intrinsic factor antibodies (IFA). We compared the diagnostic performance of two APCA detection methods: indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) and immunodot assay.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients with B12 deficiency and APCA positivity without IFA. PA diagnosis was adjudicated by blinded expert based on histology and response to oral B12. Patients were classified as true PA (APCA-PA), false positive (APCA-FP), or undetermined. Only APCA-PA and APCA-FP cases were analyzed.

Results: Among 56 included patients, 19 were classified as APCA-PA and compared to 24 APCA-FP. APCA immunodot assay was positive in 19/19 APCA-PA vs. 23/24 APCA-FP (p>0.99), while APCA IIF was positive in 13/19 APCA-PA vs. 2/24 APCA-FP (p<0.001), with higher IIF titers among APCA-PA (p<0.001). Only IIF positivity was significantly associated with PA (68.4 % vs. 8.3 %, p<0.001), with 92 % specificity. This association was confirmed in multivariate analysis (OR 37.1 [95 % CI: 6.1-439.4]). APCA IIF titer was also associated with PA diagnosis (AUC 0.82 [95 % CI: 0.68-0.96]), and titer ≥1:80 further improved specificity to 96 %.

Conclusions: IIF is more specific than immunodot for PA diagnosis, and its result should prevail over immunodot when deciding whether to perform EGD, when EGD is not feasible, and when establishing the diagnosis if biopsies are inconclusive.