Co-creating community engagement and involvement strategies: understanding challenges and needs of people living with multiple long-term conditions and stakeholders' perspectives in India and Nepal.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Monika Arora, Mansi Chopra, Radhika Shrivastav, Nikhil Srinivasapura Venkateshmurthy, Natalia Oli, Niharika Rao, Mansi Gupta, Shabana Cassambai, Patrick Highton, Abhinav Vaidya, Kuldeep Singh, Amanda Crompton, Sailesh Mohan, Kamlesh Khunti, Dorairaj Prabhakaran
{"title":"Co-creating community engagement and involvement strategies: understanding challenges and needs of people living with multiple long-term conditions and stakeholders' perspectives in India and Nepal.","authors":"Monika Arora, Mansi Chopra, Radhika Shrivastav, Nikhil Srinivasapura Venkateshmurthy, Natalia Oli, Niharika Rao, Mansi Gupta, Shabana Cassambai, Patrick Highton, Abhinav Vaidya, Kuldeep Singh, Amanda Crompton, Sailesh Mohan, Kamlesh Khunti, Dorairaj Prabhakaran","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2025-018968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Living with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs) presents significant healthcare and patient-level challenges, which are further compounded by fragmented and poorly coordinated healthcare systems, leading to difficulties in access, dissatisfaction with quality of services, non-engagement with treatment protocols and poor outcomes. Overcoming these barriers requires a strong and equitable primary healthcare system that prioritises people-centred care and fosters meaningful community engagement. We aimed to understand how individuals with MLTCs navigate healthcare systems and co-create strategies to support community engagement.10 community conversations (n=90 respondents) were held in New Delhi, Jodhpur, Visakhapatnam (India), Duwakot and Bhaktapur (Nepal) between October-November 2021. These structured discussions explored experiences, beliefs, needs and perceptions of people living with MLTCs, caregivers and healthcare providers. Participants included adults aged 30-75 years, with an equal distribution of men and women. Respondents living with MLTCs reported conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory diseases and mental health conditions. Using a six-step inductive thematic analysis, we examined access, availability, affordability of healthcare services, continuity of care, expectations of health system interventions-electronic decision support system, assisted telemedicine, patient-facing services and community engagement and involvement (CEI).Six key themes emerged: (1) definition of community; (2) disease labelling, identity, social stigma, discrimination and coping mechanisms among people living with MLTCs; (3) access, availability and affordability of medications and healthcare services and associated challenges in receiving care; (4) role of local leaders, decision makers and healthcare professionals; (5) uptake, acceptability and building capacity on use of digital interventions such as telemedicine for healthcare service delivery; (6) community engagement methods, including the need for creation of community champions and innovative approaches to improve healthcare service delivery.The findings highlight significant barriers to accessing care yet also demonstrate the community's readiness to embrace digital tools, especially when guided and supported by trusted local leaders. These insights have key implications for health policy and programme design. Meaningfully engaging people with lived experiences as community champions can improve trust, screening, early diagnosis and self-management, while also bridging gaps between communities and health systems. Digital health interventions such as telemedicine should be embedded within primary care systems through culturally resonant and locally tailored approaches that build digital literacy and foster acceptance. Co-created CEI strategies can help design more equitable, people-centred and scalable health interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439158/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2025-018968","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Living with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs) presents significant healthcare and patient-level challenges, which are further compounded by fragmented and poorly coordinated healthcare systems, leading to difficulties in access, dissatisfaction with quality of services, non-engagement with treatment protocols and poor outcomes. Overcoming these barriers requires a strong and equitable primary healthcare system that prioritises people-centred care and fosters meaningful community engagement. We aimed to understand how individuals with MLTCs navigate healthcare systems and co-create strategies to support community engagement.10 community conversations (n=90 respondents) were held in New Delhi, Jodhpur, Visakhapatnam (India), Duwakot and Bhaktapur (Nepal) between October-November 2021. These structured discussions explored experiences, beliefs, needs and perceptions of people living with MLTCs, caregivers and healthcare providers. Participants included adults aged 30-75 years, with an equal distribution of men and women. Respondents living with MLTCs reported conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory diseases and mental health conditions. Using a six-step inductive thematic analysis, we examined access, availability, affordability of healthcare services, continuity of care, expectations of health system interventions-electronic decision support system, assisted telemedicine, patient-facing services and community engagement and involvement (CEI).Six key themes emerged: (1) definition of community; (2) disease labelling, identity, social stigma, discrimination and coping mechanisms among people living with MLTCs; (3) access, availability and affordability of medications and healthcare services and associated challenges in receiving care; (4) role of local leaders, decision makers and healthcare professionals; (5) uptake, acceptability and building capacity on use of digital interventions such as telemedicine for healthcare service delivery; (6) community engagement methods, including the need for creation of community champions and innovative approaches to improve healthcare service delivery.The findings highlight significant barriers to accessing care yet also demonstrate the community's readiness to embrace digital tools, especially when guided and supported by trusted local leaders. These insights have key implications for health policy and programme design. Meaningfully engaging people with lived experiences as community champions can improve trust, screening, early diagnosis and self-management, while also bridging gaps between communities and health systems. Digital health interventions such as telemedicine should be embedded within primary care systems through culturally resonant and locally tailored approaches that build digital literacy and foster acceptance. Co-created CEI strategies can help design more equitable, people-centred and scalable health interventions.

共同创建社区参与和参与战略:了解印度和尼泊尔长期生活在多种条件下的人们的挑战和需求以及利益相关者的观点。
患有多种长期疾病(MLTCs)的患者面临着重大的医疗保健和患者层面的挑战,而分散和缺乏协调的医疗保健系统进一步加剧了这一挑战,导致难以获得服务,对服务质量不满,不参与治疗方案和不良结果。克服这些障碍需要一个强大和公平的初级卫生保健系统,优先考虑以人为本的护理并促进有意义的社区参与。我们的目的是了解患有MLTCs的个人如何使用医疗保健系统并共同制定策略以支持社区参与。2021年10月至11月期间,在新德里、焦特布尔、维沙卡帕特南(印度)、杜瓦科特和巴克塔普尔(尼泊尔)举行了10次社区对话(n=90名受访者)。这些有组织的讨论探讨了与多国ltcs一起生活的人、护理人员和医疗保健提供者的经历、信念、需求和看法。参与者包括30-75岁的成年人,男女比例相等。患有慢性慢性阻塞性肺病的答复者报告了糖尿病、高血压、心血管疾病、慢性呼吸系统疾病和精神健康状况等情况。采用六步归纳专题分析,我们考察了医疗服务的可及性、可负担性、护理的连续性、对医疗系统干预的期望——电子决策支持系统、辅助远程医疗、面向患者的服务和社区参与和参与(CEI)。出现了六个关键主题:(1)社区的定义;(2) MLTCs患者的疾病标签、身份、社会污名、歧视和应对机制;(3)药品和保健服务的可及性、可获得性和可负担性,以及接受护理方面的相关挑战;(4)地方领导、决策者和卫生保健专业人员的作用;(5)利用远程医疗等数字干预措施提供医疗保健服务的吸收、接受和能力建设;(6)社区参与方法,包括需要建立社区倡导者和改进保健服务提供的创新方法。调查结果强调了获得医疗服务的重大障碍,但也表明社区愿意接受数字工具,特别是在值得信赖的地方领导人的指导和支持下。这些见解对卫生政策和规划设计具有重要意义。有意义地让有生活经历的人成为社区倡导者,可以改善信任、筛查、早期诊断和自我管理,同时还可以弥合社区与卫生系统之间的差距。远程医疗等数字卫生干预措施应通过在文化上引起共鸣和因地制宜的方法纳入初级保健系统,从而培养数字素养并促进接受度。共同制定的“中欧倡议”战略有助于设计更公平、以人为本和可扩展的卫生干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信