The upstream-downstream tension in the global health classroom.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Neha Faruqui, Edward Jegasothy, Javier M Rodriguez, Seye Abimbola
{"title":"The upstream-downstream tension in the global health classroom.","authors":"Neha Faruqui, Edward Jegasothy, Javier M Rodriguez, Seye Abimbola","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2025-019131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this practice paper, we reflect on our practices, experiences and observations of teaching global and public health, with a focus on navigating the upstream-downstream tension. The concept of upstream determination of health encompasses how the social, structural and systemic drivers shape health and well-being. This paper discusses the challenges of foregrounding this concept in pedagogy through four key themes: (1) a lack of uniformity in integrating upstream concepts across disciplines related to health, and the ways in which it could be better integrated specifically into global health curricula; (2) helping students navigate the upstream-downstream tension by reflecting on why downstream solutions are more prevalent and how to better understand the structural responses, which are needed for achieving health equity; (3) why upstream thinking is hard to teach and learn, given that upstream determination can be complex, less familiar and abstract (we outline conceptual barriers and pedagogical challenges, common missteps and potential strategies to overcome them); (4) looking upstream in global health roles; how future graduates may consider ways to work upstream in their role as global health professionals, given that many job opportunities tend to focus downstream. This paper highlights the challenges of teaching upstream determination in global health, with a call to more uniformly integrate its concepts into curricula and offers potential strategies for teachers to meaningfully and collectively foreground such concepts within pedagogical delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12434733/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2025-019131","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this practice paper, we reflect on our practices, experiences and observations of teaching global and public health, with a focus on navigating the upstream-downstream tension. The concept of upstream determination of health encompasses how the social, structural and systemic drivers shape health and well-being. This paper discusses the challenges of foregrounding this concept in pedagogy through four key themes: (1) a lack of uniformity in integrating upstream concepts across disciplines related to health, and the ways in which it could be better integrated specifically into global health curricula; (2) helping students navigate the upstream-downstream tension by reflecting on why downstream solutions are more prevalent and how to better understand the structural responses, which are needed for achieving health equity; (3) why upstream thinking is hard to teach and learn, given that upstream determination can be complex, less familiar and abstract (we outline conceptual barriers and pedagogical challenges, common missteps and potential strategies to overcome them); (4) looking upstream in global health roles; how future graduates may consider ways to work upstream in their role as global health professionals, given that many job opportunities tend to focus downstream. This paper highlights the challenges of teaching upstream determination in global health, with a call to more uniformly integrate its concepts into curricula and offers potential strategies for teachers to meaningfully and collectively foreground such concepts within pedagogical delivery.

全球健康课堂的上下游张力。
在这篇实践论文中,我们反思了我们在全球和公共卫生教学中的实践、经验和观察,重点是如何应对上下游的紧张关系。健康的上游决定概念包括社会、结构和系统驱动因素如何影响健康和福祉。本文通过四个关键主题讨论了在教育学中突出这一概念的挑战:(1)在整合与健康相关的跨学科上游概念方面缺乏统一性,以及如何更好地将其具体纳入全球健康课程;(2)通过反思为什么下游解决方案更为普遍,以及如何更好地理解实现卫生公平所需的结构性反应,帮助学生应对上下游紧张关系;(3)为什么上游思维很难教授和学习,因为上游的决定可能是复杂的、不太熟悉的和抽象的(我们概述了概念上的障碍和教学上的挑战、常见的失误和克服它们的潜在策略);(4)放眼上游的全球卫生角色;鉴于许多工作机会往往集中在下游,未来的毕业生如何考虑在全球卫生专业人员的角色中上游工作。本文强调了在全球卫生中讲授上游决定的挑战,呼吁更统一地将其概念纳入课程,并为教师在教学中有意义地和集体地突出这些概念提供了潜在的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信