John P Gilmore,Tonda L Hughes,Sean Kearns,Laurie A Drabble,Diarmuid Stokes,Siobhán D Thomas,Chris Noone,Lauren Bochicchio
{"title":"Scoping Review of Sexual and Gender Minority Health Research in Ireland.","authors":"John P Gilmore,Tonda L Hughes,Sean Kearns,Laurie A Drabble,Diarmuid Stokes,Siobhán D Thomas,Chris Noone,Lauren Bochicchio","doi":"10.1111/jan.70201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\r\nTo map existing sexual and gender minority (SGM) health research in Ireland, identify gaps in literature and outline priorities for future research and healthcare. SGM is an umbrella term that includes people who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or intersex and is sometimes abbreviated as LGBTQI+.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nA scoping review of peer-reviewed studies published between 2014 and 2024.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe review followed Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines and PRISMA-ScR framework for scoping reviews. Articles were identified through systematic database searches and screened independently by reviewers.\r\n\r\nDATA SOURCES\r\nPubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Embase were searched for articles published between January 2014 and April 2024. Sixty studies met inclusion criteria.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe review highlighted a disproportionate focus on gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (gbMSM), particularly regarding HIV and sexual health. Mental health research revealed high levels of anxiety, depression and suicidality, largely attributed to minority stress and systemic discrimination. Transgender health studies documented barriers to accessing gender-affirming care and mental health services. Few studies explored experiences of sexual minority women, older SGM individuals or intersex people. Intersectional perspectives on race, disability and socio-economic status were notably absent.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nSGM health research in Ireland reflects significant progress in documenting disparities in mental and sexual health. However, there is a lack of representation for some groups. There is also limited attention to intersectionality. Systematic gaps in sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data impede targeted policymaking and service delivery.\r\n\r\nIMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE\r\nFindings underscore the need for inclusive, culturally competent healthcare services, better integration of SGM health topics into nursing education, and community-centred interventions. Addressing structural barriers and improving provider competence can enhance equitable healthcare access for SGM populations.\r\n\r\nIMPACT\r\nThis review addresses the fragmented state of SGM health research in Ireland, highlighting gaps in representation and systemic issues.\r\n\r\nNO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION\r\nAuthorship includes individuals from various sexual and gender minority communities.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70201","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AIM
To map existing sexual and gender minority (SGM) health research in Ireland, identify gaps in literature and outline priorities for future research and healthcare. SGM is an umbrella term that includes people who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or intersex and is sometimes abbreviated as LGBTQI+.
DESIGN
A scoping review of peer-reviewed studies published between 2014 and 2024.
METHODS
The review followed Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines and PRISMA-ScR framework for scoping reviews. Articles were identified through systematic database searches and screened independently by reviewers.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Embase were searched for articles published between January 2014 and April 2024. Sixty studies met inclusion criteria.
RESULTS
The review highlighted a disproportionate focus on gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (gbMSM), particularly regarding HIV and sexual health. Mental health research revealed high levels of anxiety, depression and suicidality, largely attributed to minority stress and systemic discrimination. Transgender health studies documented barriers to accessing gender-affirming care and mental health services. Few studies explored experiences of sexual minority women, older SGM individuals or intersex people. Intersectional perspectives on race, disability and socio-economic status were notably absent.
CONCLUSION
SGM health research in Ireland reflects significant progress in documenting disparities in mental and sexual health. However, there is a lack of representation for some groups. There is also limited attention to intersectionality. Systematic gaps in sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data impede targeted policymaking and service delivery.
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE
Findings underscore the need for inclusive, culturally competent healthcare services, better integration of SGM health topics into nursing education, and community-centred interventions. Addressing structural barriers and improving provider competence can enhance equitable healthcare access for SGM populations.
IMPACT
This review addresses the fragmented state of SGM health research in Ireland, highlighting gaps in representation and systemic issues.
NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION
Authorship includes individuals from various sexual and gender minority communities.
目的:绘制爱尔兰现有的性和性别少数群体健康研究地图,确定文献中的差距,概述未来研究和保健的优先事项。SGM是一个总称,包括女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、酷儿或双性人,有时缩写为LGBTQI+。DESIGNA对2014年至2024年间发表的同行评议研究进行了范围审查。方法采用Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI)指南和PRISMA-ScR框架进行综述。文章是通过系统的数据库检索确定的,并由审稿人独立筛选。检索2014年1月至2024年4月间发表的文章:pubmed、PsycINFO、CINAHL和Embase。60项研究符合纳入标准。结果:审查强调了对同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者(gbMSM)的过分关注,特别是在艾滋病毒和性健康方面。心理健康研究显示,高水平的焦虑、抑郁和自杀,主要归因于少数族裔压力和系统性歧视。跨性别健康研究记录了获得性别确认护理和心理健康服务的障碍。很少有研究探讨性少数女性、老年SGM个体或双性人的经历。关于种族、残疾和社会经济地位的交叉性观点明显缺失。结论爱尔兰的sgm健康研究反映了在记录心理和性健康差异方面取得的重大进展。然而,一些群体缺乏代表。对交叉性的关注也很有限。性取向和性别认同(SOGI)数据的系统性差距阻碍了有针对性的政策制定和服务提供。对专业和/或患者护理的影响研究结果强调需要包容性的、文化上有竞争力的医疗保健服务,更好地将SGM健康主题纳入护理教育,以及以社区为中心的干预措施。解决结构性障碍和提高提供者的能力可以促进性别歧视人群获得公平的医疗保健服务。影响本综述解决了爱尔兰SGM健康研究的碎片状态,突出了代表性和系统性问题方面的差距。无患者或公众贡献作者包括来自不同性和性别少数群体的个人。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy.
All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.