Social Representations of Bedside Milk Expression Among Mothers of Preterm Newborns in Neonatal Intensive Care Units.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Ana Karen de Sousa Alves,Ana Paula Melo Façanha,Elaine Meireles Castro,Keline Soraya Santana Nobre,Flávia Vasconcelos Teixeira,Maria Milena Farias de Souza Castro,José Mateus Pires,Victórya Suéllen Maciel Abreu,Priscila de Souza Aquino
{"title":"Social Representations of Bedside Milk Expression Among Mothers of Preterm Newborns in Neonatal Intensive Care Units.","authors":"Ana Karen de Sousa Alves,Ana Paula Melo Façanha,Elaine Meireles Castro,Keline Soraya Santana Nobre,Flávia Vasconcelos Teixeira,Maria Milena Farias de Souza Castro,José Mateus Pires,Victórya Suéllen Maciel Abreu,Priscila de Souza Aquino","doi":"10.1111/jan.70228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\r\nTo understand the social representations of bedside milk expression (BME) among mothers of preterm newborns in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nQualitative descriptive study.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe study was conducted from July to August 2024 in two NICUs of a referral maternity hospital in Fortaleza, Brazil. Nineteen mothers of hospitalised premature newborns participated. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and subjected to thematic content analysis.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nMothers perceived BME as a meaningful act of protection and bonding, though some were unfamiliar with the practice. Emotional ambivalence was common, shaped by prior breastfeeding experiences and the context of prematurity. Discomfort related to privacy and shared spaces was noted. Support from healthcare professionals was essential to promote understanding and adherence.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nSocial representations of BME are shaped by emotional, social and institutional experiences. Anchored in prior breastfeeding experiences and cultural meanings of maternal care, the practice is objectified through both gestures of affection and tangible barriers.\r\n\r\nIMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE\r\nHealthcare professionals, particularly nurses, should receive training to support mothers in BME. Structural improvements, privacy and emotional support are essential for fostering maternal autonomy and confidence.\r\n\r\nIMPACT\r\nThis study highlights the barriers to BME, emphasising the role of healthcare support and the need for better infrastructure, privacy and training to enhance maternal confidence and breastfeeding.\r\n\r\nREPORTING METHOD\r\nThe study followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist.\r\n\r\nPATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION\r\nNone. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER CONTRIBUTE TO THE WIDER GLOBAL CLINICAL COMMUNITY?: This paper highlights the pivotal role of healthcare professional support in overcoming barriers to BME and promoting breastfeeding practices. WHAT ALREADY IS KNOWN?: Fresh breast milk is considered the gold standard for reducing complications and improving survival in preterm infants. BME is recommended as an effective strategy to ensure the availability of fresh breast milk. Mothers' social representations of this practice remain underexplored within the neonatal intensive care context. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS?: Explores mothers' social representations of BME in NICUs, addressing a significant gap in qualitative research. Reveals how emotional, social and institutional factors shape mothers' perceptions, motivations and challenges related to BME. Highlights the need for targeted professional support, improved infrastructure and privacy to enhance maternal autonomy and adherence to milk expression practices.\r\n\r\nIMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE\r\nHealthcare professionals, particularly nurses, should receive specialised training to provide technical guidance and emotional support, enhancing mothers' confidence and autonomy in BME. Improving infrastructure and ensuring privacy in NICUs are crucial to creating supportive environments that facilitate milk expression and strengthen maternal-infant bonding. Institutional policies should integrate maternal-centred strategies to support breastfeeding continuity and promote humanised neonatal care.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70228","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AIM To understand the social representations of bedside milk expression (BME) among mothers of preterm newborns in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). DESIGN Qualitative descriptive study. METHODS The study was conducted from July to August 2024 in two NICUs of a referral maternity hospital in Fortaleza, Brazil. Nineteen mothers of hospitalised premature newborns participated. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and subjected to thematic content analysis. RESULTS Mothers perceived BME as a meaningful act of protection and bonding, though some were unfamiliar with the practice. Emotional ambivalence was common, shaped by prior breastfeeding experiences and the context of prematurity. Discomfort related to privacy and shared spaces was noted. Support from healthcare professionals was essential to promote understanding and adherence. CONCLUSION Social representations of BME are shaped by emotional, social and institutional experiences. Anchored in prior breastfeeding experiences and cultural meanings of maternal care, the practice is objectified through both gestures of affection and tangible barriers. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE Healthcare professionals, particularly nurses, should receive training to support mothers in BME. Structural improvements, privacy and emotional support are essential for fostering maternal autonomy and confidence. IMPACT This study highlights the barriers to BME, emphasising the role of healthcare support and the need for better infrastructure, privacy and training to enhance maternal confidence and breastfeeding. REPORTING METHOD The study followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION None. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER CONTRIBUTE TO THE WIDER GLOBAL CLINICAL COMMUNITY?: This paper highlights the pivotal role of healthcare professional support in overcoming barriers to BME and promoting breastfeeding practices. WHAT ALREADY IS KNOWN?: Fresh breast milk is considered the gold standard for reducing complications and improving survival in preterm infants. BME is recommended as an effective strategy to ensure the availability of fresh breast milk. Mothers' social representations of this practice remain underexplored within the neonatal intensive care context. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS?: Explores mothers' social representations of BME in NICUs, addressing a significant gap in qualitative research. Reveals how emotional, social and institutional factors shape mothers' perceptions, motivations and challenges related to BME. Highlights the need for targeted professional support, improved infrastructure and privacy to enhance maternal autonomy and adherence to milk expression practices. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Healthcare professionals, particularly nurses, should receive specialised training to provide technical guidance and emotional support, enhancing mothers' confidence and autonomy in BME. Improving infrastructure and ensuring privacy in NICUs are crucial to creating supportive environments that facilitate milk expression and strengthen maternal-infant bonding. Institutional policies should integrate maternal-centred strategies to support breastfeeding continuity and promote humanised neonatal care.
新生儿重症监护病房早产儿母亲床边乳汁表达的社会表征
目的了解新生儿重症监护病房(NICUs)早产儿母亲床边奶表达(BME)的社会表征。设计定性描述性研究。方法研究于2024年7月至8月在巴西福塔莱萨一家转诊妇产医院的两个新生儿重症监护病房进行。19名住院早产新生儿的母亲参与了调查。进行了半结构化访谈,并进行了主题内容分析。结果母亲们认为BME是一种有意义的保护和联系行为,尽管有些人不熟悉这种做法。情感矛盾是常见的,由先前的母乳喂养经历和早产的背景形成。注意到与隐私和共享空间有关的不适。医疗保健专业人员的支持对于促进理解和依从性至关重要。结论BME的社会表征受情感经历、社会经历和制度经历的影响。基于以往的母乳喂养经验和孕产妇护理的文化意义,这种做法通过情感的姿态和有形的障碍被客观化。对专业和/或患者护理的影响医疗保健专业人员,特别是护士,应该接受培训,以支持母亲的BME。结构改进、隐私和情感支持对于培养母亲的自主和自信至关重要。影响:这项研究强调了实施母乳喂养的障碍,强调了保健支助的作用,以及需要更好的基础设施、隐私和培训,以增强母亲的信心和母乳喂养。报告方法本研究遵循定性研究报告综合标准清单。病人或公众捐款无。这篇论文对更广泛的全球临床社区有什么贡献?本文强调了医疗保健专业支持在克服BME障碍和促进母乳喂养实践中的关键作用。什么是已知的?新鲜母乳被认为是减少并发症和提高早产儿存活率的黄金标准。建议将BME作为确保获得新鲜母乳的有效策略。在新生儿重症监护的背景下,母亲对这种做法的社会表现仍未得到充分探讨。这篇文章补充了什么?探讨新生儿重症监护病房中母亲对BME的社会表征,解决了定性研究的重大空白。揭示了情感、社会和制度因素如何塑造母亲对BME的看法、动机和挑战。强调需要有针对性的专业支持,改善基础设施和隐私,以增强母亲的自主权和对母乳表达实践的坚持。对实践的启示医疗专业人员,特别是护士,应该接受专门的培训,提供技术指导和情感支持,增强母亲对BME的信心和自主权。改善新生儿重症监护病房的基础设施和确保隐私对于创造促进乳汁分泌和加强母婴关系的支持性环境至关重要。机构政策应整合以产妇为中心的战略,以支持母乳喂养的连续性并促进人性化的新生儿护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信