Use of Electronic Databases to Access Research Literature Among Nurses for Evidence-Based Practice: A Cross-Sectional Survey Among Indian Nurses.

Q2 Medicine
Latika Rohilla, Nitasha Sharma, Ashok Kumar, Gurpreet Kaur, Sonali Surya, Sushma Saini, Sukhpal Kaur
{"title":"Use of Electronic Databases to Access Research Literature Among Nurses for Evidence-Based Practice: A Cross-Sectional Survey Among Indian Nurses.","authors":"Latika Rohilla, Nitasha Sharma, Ashok Kumar, Gurpreet Kaur, Sonali Surya, Sushma Saini, Sukhpal Kaur","doi":"10.1080/00185868.2025.2561129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Access to electronic databases is crucial for enabling evidence-based practice in nursing, enhancing patient care and clinical outcomes. In developing countries like India, there is limited data on the extent to which nurses use these databases in daily practice, affecting evidence-based practice adoption. This study aimed to assess (1) the usage of electronic databases by nurses for accessing research literature to support evidence-based practice, and (2) the relationship between socio-demographic factors and both the usage of and confidence in using these databases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among nursing professionals in North India, encompassing those in clinical practice, education, and research. A 15-item online questionnaire collected socio-demographic and professional data, information on database use (PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane), confidence in usage, and perceived barriers. Chi-square analyses explored associations between variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 506 respondents (mean age 36.09 ± 9.6 years), 68% reported using electronic databases, while 55.5% preferred general search engines like Google for clinical queries. About 30% lacked access to databases. No significant association was observed between electronic database usage and age, gender, or years of experience. However, significant associations were found with qualifications (<i>p</i> = 0.000), area of work (<i>p</i> = 0.000), and access to computers at work (<i>p</i> = 0.009) or home (<i>p</i> = 0.000). Usage was also significantly associated with the medical-surgical nursing specialty (<i>p</i> = 0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Enhancing evidence-based practice among nurses requires addressing barriers to database access, improving resource availability, and promoting continuous professional development across diverse nursing settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":55886,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Topics","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital Topics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00185868.2025.2561129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Access to electronic databases is crucial for enabling evidence-based practice in nursing, enhancing patient care and clinical outcomes. In developing countries like India, there is limited data on the extent to which nurses use these databases in daily practice, affecting evidence-based practice adoption. This study aimed to assess (1) the usage of electronic databases by nurses for accessing research literature to support evidence-based practice, and (2) the relationship between socio-demographic factors and both the usage of and confidence in using these databases.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among nursing professionals in North India, encompassing those in clinical practice, education, and research. A 15-item online questionnaire collected socio-demographic and professional data, information on database use (PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane), confidence in usage, and perceived barriers. Chi-square analyses explored associations between variables.

Results: Among 506 respondents (mean age 36.09 ± 9.6 years), 68% reported using electronic databases, while 55.5% preferred general search engines like Google for clinical queries. About 30% lacked access to databases. No significant association was observed between electronic database usage and age, gender, or years of experience. However, significant associations were found with qualifications (p = 0.000), area of work (p = 0.000), and access to computers at work (p = 0.009) or home (p = 0.000). Usage was also significantly associated with the medical-surgical nursing specialty (p = 0.014).

Conclusion: Enhancing evidence-based practice among nurses requires addressing barriers to database access, improving resource availability, and promoting continuous professional development across diverse nursing settings.

使用电子数据库访问研究文献的护士循证实践:印度护士的横断面调查。
目的:访问电子数据库对于实现护理中的循证实践,提高患者护理和临床结果至关重要。在印度等发展中国家,关于护士在日常实践中使用这些数据库的程度的数据有限,影响了循证实践的采用。本研究旨在评估(1)护士使用电子数据库获取研究文献以支持循证实践的情况,以及(2)社会人口因素与这些数据库的使用和使用信心之间的关系。方法:对北印度的护理专业人员进行了横断面调查,包括临床实践,教育和研究人员。一份15项的在线问卷收集了社会人口统计和专业数据、数据库使用信息(PubMed、CINAHL、Cochrane)、使用信心和感知障碍。卡方分析探讨了变量之间的关联。结果:506名受访者(平均年龄36.09±9.6岁)中,68%的人使用电子数据库进行临床查询,55.5%的人使用谷歌等通用搜索引擎进行临床查询。大约30%的人无法访问数据库。电子数据库的使用与年龄、性别或经验年数之间没有明显的关联。然而,与资历(p = 0.000)、工作领域(p = 0.000)以及在工作场所(p = 0.009)或家中(p = 0.000)使用电脑有显著关联。使用率也与内科-外科护理专业显著相关(p = 0.014)。结论:加强护士的循证实践需要解决数据库访问障碍,改善资源可用性,促进不同护理环境的持续专业发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hospital Topics
Hospital Topics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Hospital Topics is the longest continuously published healthcare journal in the United States. Since 1922, Hospital Topics has provided healthcare professionals with research they can apply to improve the quality of access, management, and delivery of healthcare. Dedicated to those who bring healthcare to the public, Hospital Topics spans the whole spectrum of healthcare issues including, but not limited to information systems, fatigue management, medication errors, nursing compensation, midwifery, job satisfaction among managers, team building, and bringing primary care to rural areas. Through articles on theory, applied research, and practice, Hospital Topics addresses the central concerns of today"s healthcare professional and leader.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信