Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Among Therapists Participating in Learning Collaboratives: Examining Two Implementation Strategies.

Hannah C Espeleta, Marin M Kautz, Shelby Wade, Carole Swiecicki, Rochelle F Hanson
{"title":"Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Among Therapists Participating in Learning Collaboratives: Examining Two Implementation Strategies.","authors":"Hannah C Espeleta, Marin M Kautz, Shelby Wade, Carole Swiecicki, Rochelle F Hanson","doi":"10.1080/23794925.2025.2485086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A Community-Based Learning Collaborative (CBLC) is a training/implementation package for evidence-based treatments (EBTs) involving multidisciplinary professionals to improve a community's response to trauma and the sustained adoption of EBTs. While CBLCs improve community-, organization-, and clinician-level factors for implementation and result in positive treatment outcomes, they require more investment than the standard Learning Collaborative (LC) model.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Research is needed to examine CBLC and LC treatment outcomes to inform decision-making on the selection of effective and cost-efficient training/ implementation packages. This study aims to address this gap by examining the impact of training type (CBLC vs LC) on TF-CBT outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study involved 441 community therapists participating in a TF-CBT LC (n=188) or CBLC (n=253). Analyses compared TF-CBT outcomes for 660 youth, ages 8-18.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mixed effect linear regressions with youth nested within therapists demonstrated no sample differences across models for child age or PTS at pre-treatment. Youth in the CBLC were more likely to be White, exhibit depressive symptoms at pre-treatment, and complete post-treatment assessments. Across both models, youth demonstrated significant decreases in PTS and depressive symptoms. The interaction of outcomes by training was not significant for depression, suggesting equivalent outcomes for the CBLC and LC. However, the significant interaction for PTS suggests the LC-trained therapists had better outcomes for youth than the CBLC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LC and CBLC for TF-CBT have similar effects on child depression, with the LC demonstrating more efficient results for the treatment of PTS. The multidisciplinary training within the CBLC may support accurate identification of depressive symptoms after a traumatic event as well as treatment retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":72992,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health","volume":"10 3","pages":"579-594"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12425430/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2025.2485086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A Community-Based Learning Collaborative (CBLC) is a training/implementation package for evidence-based treatments (EBTs) involving multidisciplinary professionals to improve a community's response to trauma and the sustained adoption of EBTs. While CBLCs improve community-, organization-, and clinician-level factors for implementation and result in positive treatment outcomes, they require more investment than the standard Learning Collaborative (LC) model.

Objective: Research is needed to examine CBLC and LC treatment outcomes to inform decision-making on the selection of effective and cost-efficient training/ implementation packages. This study aims to address this gap by examining the impact of training type (CBLC vs LC) on TF-CBT outcomes.

Method: This study involved 441 community therapists participating in a TF-CBT LC (n=188) or CBLC (n=253). Analyses compared TF-CBT outcomes for 660 youth, ages 8-18.

Results: Mixed effect linear regressions with youth nested within therapists demonstrated no sample differences across models for child age or PTS at pre-treatment. Youth in the CBLC were more likely to be White, exhibit depressive symptoms at pre-treatment, and complete post-treatment assessments. Across both models, youth demonstrated significant decreases in PTS and depressive symptoms. The interaction of outcomes by training was not significant for depression, suggesting equivalent outcomes for the CBLC and LC. However, the significant interaction for PTS suggests the LC-trained therapists had better outcomes for youth than the CBLC.

Conclusions: The LC and CBLC for TF-CBT have similar effects on child depression, with the LC demonstrating more efficient results for the treatment of PTS. The multidisciplinary training within the CBLC may support accurate identification of depressive symptoms after a traumatic event as well as treatment retention.

创伤为中心的认知行为治疗治疗师参与学习合作:检查两种实施策略。
背景:基于社区的学习协作(CBLC)是一种基于证据的治疗(ebt)培训/实施包,涉及多学科专业人员,以改善社区对创伤的反应和持续采用ebt。虽然CBLCs改善了社区、组织和临床层面的实施因素,并产生了积极的治疗结果,但与标准的学习协作(LC)模式相比,它们需要更多的投资。目的:需要研究CBLC和LC治疗结果,以便为选择有效且成本效益高的培训/实施方案提供决策依据。本研究旨在通过检查训练类型(CBLC vs LC)对TF-CBT结果的影响来解决这一差距。方法:本研究纳入441名参与TF-CBT LC (n=188)或CBLC (n=253)的社区治疗师。分析比较了660名8-18岁青少年的TF-CBT结果。结果:混合效应线性回归显示,在治疗前,儿童年龄或PTS模型之间没有样本差异。在CBLC的青年更有可能是白人,在治疗前表现出抑郁症状,并完成治疗后的评估。在这两种模型中,年轻人表现出PTS和抑郁症状的显著下降。训练结果的相互作用对抑郁症不显著,表明CBLC和LC的结果相同。然而,PTS的显著相互作用表明lc训练的治疗师比CBLC对青少年有更好的结果。结论:TF-CBT的LC和CBLC对儿童抑郁症的治疗效果相似,LC对PTS的治疗效果更有效。CBLC内的多学科培训可能有助于创伤性事件后抑郁症状的准确识别以及治疗的保留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信