The Mediating Role of Moral Resilience in the Relationship Between Moral Distress and End-of-Life Care Attitudes and Behaviours Among Intensive Care Nurses.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Özkan Sir, Mağfiret Kaşıkçı, Ebubekir Kaplan
{"title":"The Mediating Role of Moral Resilience in the Relationship Between Moral Distress and End-of-Life Care Attitudes and Behaviours Among Intensive Care Nurses.","authors":"Özkan Sir, Mağfiret Kaşıkçı, Ebubekir Kaplan","doi":"10.1111/nicc.70171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intensive care nurses experience moral distress due to moral conflicts, which negatively impact their attitudes and behaviours towards end-of-life care. Moral resilience is considered a potential factor in mitigating these negative effects.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to examine the mediating role of moral resilience in the relationship between moral distress and intensive care nurses' attitudes and behaviours towards end-of-life care.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines for observational studies (STROBE). The study was conducted with 228 intensive care nurses between December 2024 and February 2025. Data were collected using the 'Personal Information Form', 'Moral Distress Scale', 'Moral Resilience Scale' and 'Scale of Attitudes and Behaviours of Intensive Care Nurses Towards End-of-Life Care'. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 26.0 and AMOS V 24.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The moral distress levels of female nurses were higher and significantly higher than male nurses (OR 0.245; 95% CI 0.074-0.598; p = 0.011). Nurses with 11 years or more of work experience had a higher and significant level of moral distress compared to other nurses (OR 0.053; 95% CI 0.080-0.115; p = 0.012). The moral resilience level of nurses with 3-6 years of work experience was higher and significantly higher than other nurses (OR 0.067; 95% CI 0.048-0.107; p = 0.023). Moral distress negatively affects nurses' attitudes and behaviours towards end-of-life care. Moral resilience has a significant and positive effect on attitudes and behaviours. Moreover, moral resilience mediated the relationship between moral distress and attitudes and behaviours towards end-of-life care (β;-0.266, CI 95% -0.301-0.197).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Moral distress negatively influences intensive care nurses' attitudes and behaviours in end-of-life care. Enhancing moral resilience can help mitigate these effects. The findings highlight the need for nursing education programmes and workplace interventions to strengthen nurses' moral resilience and improve their ability to manage moral distress.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>While moral distress damages intensive care nurses' attitudes towards end-of-life care, moral resilience may help to reduce its negative effects. Supporting nurses is thought to improve the quality of adverse end-of-life care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":"30 5","pages":"e70171"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70171","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intensive care nurses experience moral distress due to moral conflicts, which negatively impact their attitudes and behaviours towards end-of-life care. Moral resilience is considered a potential factor in mitigating these negative effects.

Aim: This study aims to examine the mediating role of moral resilience in the relationship between moral distress and intensive care nurses' attitudes and behaviours towards end-of-life care.

Study design: A descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines for observational studies (STROBE). The study was conducted with 228 intensive care nurses between December 2024 and February 2025. Data were collected using the 'Personal Information Form', 'Moral Distress Scale', 'Moral Resilience Scale' and 'Scale of Attitudes and Behaviours of Intensive Care Nurses Towards End-of-Life Care'. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 26.0 and AMOS V 24.0.

Results: The moral distress levels of female nurses were higher and significantly higher than male nurses (OR 0.245; 95% CI 0.074-0.598; p = 0.011). Nurses with 11 years or more of work experience had a higher and significant level of moral distress compared to other nurses (OR 0.053; 95% CI 0.080-0.115; p = 0.012). The moral resilience level of nurses with 3-6 years of work experience was higher and significantly higher than other nurses (OR 0.067; 95% CI 0.048-0.107; p = 0.023). Moral distress negatively affects nurses' attitudes and behaviours towards end-of-life care. Moral resilience has a significant and positive effect on attitudes and behaviours. Moreover, moral resilience mediated the relationship between moral distress and attitudes and behaviours towards end-of-life care (β;-0.266, CI 95% -0.301-0.197).

Conclusions: Moral distress negatively influences intensive care nurses' attitudes and behaviours in end-of-life care. Enhancing moral resilience can help mitigate these effects. The findings highlight the need for nursing education programmes and workplace interventions to strengthen nurses' moral resilience and improve their ability to manage moral distress.

Relevance to clinical practice: While moral distress damages intensive care nurses' attitudes towards end-of-life care, moral resilience may help to reduce its negative effects. Supporting nurses is thought to improve the quality of adverse end-of-life care.

道德弹性在重症护士道德困扰与临终关怀态度和行为关系中的中介作用。
背景:重症监护护士由于道德冲突而经历道德困境,这对他们对临终关怀的态度和行为产生了负面影响。道德弹性被认为是减轻这些负面影响的潜在因素。目的:本研究旨在探讨道德弹性在道德困扰与重症监护护士临终关怀态度和行为之间的中介作用。研究设计:按照观察性研究指南(STROBE)进行描述性和横断面研究。该研究于2024年12月至2025年2月期间对228名重症监护护士进行了研究。数据采用“个人信息表”、“道德困扰量表”、“道德恢复量表”和“重症监护护士临终关怀态度和行为量表”收集。采用SPSS 26.0和AMOS V 24.0进行统计学分析。结果:女护士道德窘迫水平较高且显著高于男护士(OR 0.245; 95% CI 0.074 ~ 0.598; p = 0.011)。具有11年及以上工作经验的护士的道德困扰水平高于其他护士(or 0.053; 95% CI 0.080-0.115; p = 0.012)。3 ~ 6年工作经验护士的道德弹性水平较高,显著高于其他护士(OR 0.067; 95% CI 0.048 ~ 0.107; p = 0.023)。道德困境负面影响护士对临终关怀的态度和行为。道德弹性对态度和行为有显著的正向影响。此外,道德弹性介导了道德困扰与临终关怀态度和行为之间的关系(β;-0.266, CI 95% -0.301-0.197)。结论:道德困扰负向影响重症监护护士临终关怀的态度和行为。增强道德韧性有助于减轻这些影响。研究结果强调了护理教育计划和工作场所干预的必要性,以加强护士的道德弹性,提高他们管理道德困境的能力。与临床实践的相关性:道德困境损害重症监护护士对临终关怀的态度,道德弹性可能有助于减少其负面影响。支持护士被认为可以提高不良临终关怀的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信