A Partially Randomized Diagnostic Trial of OCT-EUS Integration: Enhancing Surgical Margin Delineation and Lymph Node Dissection in Oncological Resection.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Clinical Medicine Insights-Oncology Pub Date : 2025-09-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11795549251363829
Yutao Wang, Lu Zhao, Jiahao Zhao, Xuanyu Wei, Daorong Wang, Jun Liu, Linjie Hu, Bing Xu, Jun Ji, Jiayi Zhang, Chaowu Chen, Dong Tang
{"title":"A Partially Randomized Diagnostic Trial of OCT-EUS Integration: Enhancing Surgical Margin Delineation and Lymph Node Dissection in Oncological Resection.","authors":"Yutao Wang, Lu Zhao, Jiahao Zhao, Xuanyu Wei, Daorong Wang, Jun Liu, Linjie Hu, Bing Xu, Jun Ji, Jiayi Zhang, Chaowu Chen, Dong Tang","doi":"10.1177/11795549251363829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate intraoperative navigation remains challenging in gastrointestinal tumor surgery. This study aims to explore the potential of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in enhancing the accuracy of intraoperative navigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center diagnostic study was conducted at Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital from August to December 2024. This study is part of a prospective study, and more patients will be recruited in the future. The normal tissues, tumor tissues, vascular tissues, adipose tissues and lymph nodes of 12 patients with gastrointestinal tumors were collected for OCT and EUS scanning, and the image differences were compared. In addition, 43 lymph node specimens from 18 randomly selected patients were scanned by OCT and EUS, and pathological reports were used as the baseline. The results of OCT and EUS were compared retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There are notable differences between OCT and EUS imaging. EUS can capture images of the entire tissue layer, making it more effective than OCT in assessing tumor invasion depth. Conversely, OCT serves as an \"optical biopsy,\" providing higher precision in the early stages of lesions. Our further research indicates that the combined application of these modalities holds significant potential. In a double-blind evaluation of 43 lymph nodes from 18 randomly selected patients, OCT demonstrated a sensitivity of 81.25%, specificity of 88.89%, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 81.25%. In comparison, EUS showed a sensitivity of 87.50%, specificity of 85.19%, and a PPV of 77.78%. The combined use of OCT and EUS achieved a sensitivity of 93.75%, specificity of 92.59%, and a PPV of 88.24%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combined use of OCT and EUS can enhance sensitivity and specificity, thereby improving the accuracy of intraoperative navigation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2400088875); Registered 28 August 2024, first patient enrolled 20 September 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":48591,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Oncology","volume":"19 ","pages":"11795549251363829"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12432324/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795549251363829","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurate intraoperative navigation remains challenging in gastrointestinal tumor surgery. This study aims to explore the potential of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in enhancing the accuracy of intraoperative navigation.

Methods: This single-center diagnostic study was conducted at Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital from August to December 2024. This study is part of a prospective study, and more patients will be recruited in the future. The normal tissues, tumor tissues, vascular tissues, adipose tissues and lymph nodes of 12 patients with gastrointestinal tumors were collected for OCT and EUS scanning, and the image differences were compared. In addition, 43 lymph node specimens from 18 randomly selected patients were scanned by OCT and EUS, and pathological reports were used as the baseline. The results of OCT and EUS were compared retrospectively.

Results: There are notable differences between OCT and EUS imaging. EUS can capture images of the entire tissue layer, making it more effective than OCT in assessing tumor invasion depth. Conversely, OCT serves as an "optical biopsy," providing higher precision in the early stages of lesions. Our further research indicates that the combined application of these modalities holds significant potential. In a double-blind evaluation of 43 lymph nodes from 18 randomly selected patients, OCT demonstrated a sensitivity of 81.25%, specificity of 88.89%, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 81.25%. In comparison, EUS showed a sensitivity of 87.50%, specificity of 85.19%, and a PPV of 77.78%. The combined use of OCT and EUS achieved a sensitivity of 93.75%, specificity of 92.59%, and a PPV of 88.24%.

Conclusions: The combined use of OCT and EUS can enhance sensitivity and specificity, thereby improving the accuracy of intraoperative navigation.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2400088875); Registered 28 August 2024, first patient enrolled 20 September 2024.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一项OCT-EUS整合的部分随机诊断试验:在肿瘤切除中增强手术边界划定和淋巴结清扫。
背景:准确的术中导航在胃肠道肿瘤手术中仍然具有挑战性。本研究旨在探讨光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和超声内镜(EUS)在提高术中导航准确性方面的潜力。方法:本研究于2024年8月- 12月在苏北人民医院进行。本研究为前瞻性研究的一部分,未来将招募更多的患者。收集12例胃肠道肿瘤患者的正常组织、肿瘤组织、血管组织、脂肪组织和淋巴结进行OCT和EUS扫描,比较图像差异。另外,随机选取18例患者43份淋巴结标本进行OCT和EUS扫描,并以病理报告为基线。回顾性比较OCT和EUS检查结果。结果:OCT影像与EUS影像有显著差异。EUS可以捕获整个组织层的图像,在评估肿瘤侵袭深度方面比OCT更有效。相反,OCT作为“光学活检”,在病变的早期阶段提供更高的精度。我们进一步的研究表明,这些模式的联合应用具有巨大的潜力。在随机选择18例患者的43个淋巴结的双盲评估中,OCT的敏感性为81.25%,特异性为88.89%,阳性预测值(PPV)为81.25%。而EUS的敏感性为87.50%,特异性为85.19%,PPV为77.78%。OCT和EUS联合使用的灵敏度为93.75%,特异性为92.59%,PPV为88.24%。结论:OCT与EUS联合应用可提高术中导航的敏感性和特异性,从而提高术中导航的准确性。试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心ChiCTR2400088875);2024年8月28日注册,2024年9月20日首例患者入组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on all aspects of cancer research and treatment, in addition to related genetic, pathophysiological and epidemiological topics. Of particular but not exclusive importance are molecular biology, clinical interventions, controlled trials, therapeutics, pharmacology and drug delivery, and techniques of cancer surgery. The journal welcomes unsolicited article proposals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信