{"title":"From translocalization to commuterization: Chinese migrant factory workers' changing arrangements of welfare and care.","authors":"Yueran Tian","doi":"10.1007/s10624-025-09769-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Based on a 10-month fieldwork in central China and 60 in-depth interviews, I explore in this paper a paradoxical phenomenon where the expansion of institutional provision of welfare fails to reach its goal of safeguarding people's well-being but intensifies the condition of insecurity experienced by migrant factory workers and their families. Recent developments in metropolitanizing spaces through land-for-welfare policies, in-migration of capital, and industrial rezoning have incorporated those at the urban fringes into the Chinese state's regional development plan. Due to land expropriation, villagers living at the urban edges are gradually replacing the rural land with cash compensation, resettlement housing, residence-based social insurances, and factory employment to secure their livelihoods and maintain social relations. As the factory is located in the neighborhood, former peasants' trajectories of travel oscillate more frequently between work and home. This creates a new mix of care wherein thin social protection provided by the state allows deeper penetration of market actors. In response to the changing welfare landscape, peasants-turned-urbanites constantly have to make trade-offs between hypermobility and stability: they follow the seasonal hiring rhythm of the factory that provides flexible wages and discourages welfare participation; or they adhere to the rules of the welfare system which requires long-term stay in the factory with low pay. As a result, workers and their families either rely on unstable income to secure their future or participate in social protection schemes in combination with speculative financial activities such as utilizing the Housing Provident Fund together with reduced-interest mortgages. People's response to the deepening commodification of land, labor, and money therefore emerges from their everyday practices and arrangement of care. In other words, how people react to the conditions of insecurity remain entangled with the welfare structures that create them.</p>","PeriodicalId":45970,"journal":{"name":"DIALECTICAL ANTHROPOLOGY","volume":"49 3","pages":"419-434"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12426070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIALECTICAL ANTHROPOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-025-09769-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Based on a 10-month fieldwork in central China and 60 in-depth interviews, I explore in this paper a paradoxical phenomenon where the expansion of institutional provision of welfare fails to reach its goal of safeguarding people's well-being but intensifies the condition of insecurity experienced by migrant factory workers and their families. Recent developments in metropolitanizing spaces through land-for-welfare policies, in-migration of capital, and industrial rezoning have incorporated those at the urban fringes into the Chinese state's regional development plan. Due to land expropriation, villagers living at the urban edges are gradually replacing the rural land with cash compensation, resettlement housing, residence-based social insurances, and factory employment to secure their livelihoods and maintain social relations. As the factory is located in the neighborhood, former peasants' trajectories of travel oscillate more frequently between work and home. This creates a new mix of care wherein thin social protection provided by the state allows deeper penetration of market actors. In response to the changing welfare landscape, peasants-turned-urbanites constantly have to make trade-offs between hypermobility and stability: they follow the seasonal hiring rhythm of the factory that provides flexible wages and discourages welfare participation; or they adhere to the rules of the welfare system which requires long-term stay in the factory with low pay. As a result, workers and their families either rely on unstable income to secure their future or participate in social protection schemes in combination with speculative financial activities such as utilizing the Housing Provident Fund together with reduced-interest mortgages. People's response to the deepening commodification of land, labor, and money therefore emerges from their everyday practices and arrangement of care. In other words, how people react to the conditions of insecurity remain entangled with the welfare structures that create them.
期刊介绍:
Dialectical Anthropology is an international journal that seeks to invigorate discussion among left intellectuals by publishing peer-reviewed articles, editorials, letters, reports from the field, political exchanges, and book reviews. The journal aims to foster open debate through criticism, research and commentary from across the social sciences and humanities. It provides a forum for work with a pronounced dialectical approach to social theory and political practice for scholars, public intellectuals, and activists who are interested in Marxism and political-economy. The journal also welcomes submissions from those who wish to be in dialogue or debate with these traditions. Since 1975, Dialectical Anthropology has been dedicated to working towards the transformation of class society through internationalizing conversations that focus on crises of capitalism and the means for social change.
The format of Dialectical Anthropology is shaped by these goals. Submissions accepted for peer review are sent to scholars, public intellectuals and activists whose comments are often published along with replies by the manuscript author to engender a dialogic exchange. The " Forum" is also dedicated to reciprocal engagement as scholars, public intellectuals and activists are invited to respond to forum statements meant to provoke debate and discussion. These exchanges provide space for dialectical engagement from a broad range of perspectives about significant issues of our time, Finally, while the book review section follows the traditional 1000 word format, Dialectical Anthropology encourages the submission of substantial essays that comparatively analyze multiple books, films, novels and other texts to contextualize them within contemporary politics, economics, society and culture.
Dialectical Anthropology invites contributions from authors committed to international political engagement across disciplinary divides, communities of practice, and oppositional political traditions by encouraging contributions from authors who seek to combine theories and practices of social change. The journal is committed to reaching beyond an Anglophone readership and encourages submissions, dialogue and active participation in languages other than English. The journal will publish these submissions to the extent that its resources and capabilities allow. Manuscripts should be submitted electronically via the Springer Website at http://dial.edmgr.com and should include abstract, five keywords, and three suggested reviewers.