From translocalization to commuterization: Chinese migrant factory workers' changing arrangements of welfare and care.

IF 1.1 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
DIALECTICAL ANTHROPOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1007/s10624-025-09769-9
Yueran Tian
{"title":"From translocalization to commuterization: Chinese migrant factory workers' changing arrangements of welfare and care.","authors":"Yueran Tian","doi":"10.1007/s10624-025-09769-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Based on a 10-month fieldwork in central China and 60 in-depth interviews, I explore in this paper a paradoxical phenomenon where the expansion of institutional provision of welfare fails to reach its goal of safeguarding people's well-being but intensifies the condition of insecurity experienced by migrant factory workers and their families. Recent developments in metropolitanizing spaces through land-for-welfare policies, in-migration of capital, and industrial rezoning have incorporated those at the urban fringes into the Chinese state's regional development plan. Due to land expropriation, villagers living at the urban edges are gradually replacing the rural land with cash compensation, resettlement housing, residence-based social insurances, and factory employment to secure their livelihoods and maintain social relations. As the factory is located in the neighborhood, former peasants' trajectories of travel oscillate more frequently between work and home. This creates a new mix of care wherein thin social protection provided by the state allows deeper penetration of market actors. In response to the changing welfare landscape, peasants-turned-urbanites constantly have to make trade-offs between hypermobility and stability: they follow the seasonal hiring rhythm of the factory that provides flexible wages and discourages welfare participation; or they adhere to the rules of the welfare system which requires long-term stay in the factory with low pay. As a result, workers and their families either rely on unstable income to secure their future or participate in social protection schemes in combination with speculative financial activities such as utilizing the Housing Provident Fund together with reduced-interest mortgages. People's response to the deepening commodification of land, labor, and money therefore emerges from their everyday practices and arrangement of care. In other words, how people react to the conditions of insecurity remain entangled with the welfare structures that create them.</p>","PeriodicalId":45970,"journal":{"name":"DIALECTICAL ANTHROPOLOGY","volume":"49 3","pages":"419-434"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12426070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIALECTICAL ANTHROPOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-025-09769-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on a 10-month fieldwork in central China and 60 in-depth interviews, I explore in this paper a paradoxical phenomenon where the expansion of institutional provision of welfare fails to reach its goal of safeguarding people's well-being but intensifies the condition of insecurity experienced by migrant factory workers and their families. Recent developments in metropolitanizing spaces through land-for-welfare policies, in-migration of capital, and industrial rezoning have incorporated those at the urban fringes into the Chinese state's regional development plan. Due to land expropriation, villagers living at the urban edges are gradually replacing the rural land with cash compensation, resettlement housing, residence-based social insurances, and factory employment to secure their livelihoods and maintain social relations. As the factory is located in the neighborhood, former peasants' trajectories of travel oscillate more frequently between work and home. This creates a new mix of care wherein thin social protection provided by the state allows deeper penetration of market actors. In response to the changing welfare landscape, peasants-turned-urbanites constantly have to make trade-offs between hypermobility and stability: they follow the seasonal hiring rhythm of the factory that provides flexible wages and discourages welfare participation; or they adhere to the rules of the welfare system which requires long-term stay in the factory with low pay. As a result, workers and their families either rely on unstable income to secure their future or participate in social protection schemes in combination with speculative financial activities such as utilizing the Housing Provident Fund together with reduced-interest mortgages. People's response to the deepening commodification of land, labor, and money therefore emerges from their everyday practices and arrangement of care. In other words, how people react to the conditions of insecurity remain entangled with the welfare structures that create them.

从迁移到通勤:中国农民工福利与关怀安排的变迁。
基于在中国中部为期10个月的实地调查和60次深度访谈,我在本文中探讨了一个矛盾的现象,即福利制度提供的扩大未能达到保障人民福祉的目标,反而加剧了农民工及其家庭所经历的不安全状况。近年来,通过土地换福利政策、资本迁入和工业区划的调整,都市空间的发展已将城市边缘地区纳入中国国家的区域发展规划。在征地过程中,城市边缘的村民逐渐以现金补偿、安置房、以居为本的社会保险、工厂就业等方式取代农村土地,以保障生计和维持社会关系。由于工厂就在附近,以前的农民的出行轨迹更频繁地在工作和家庭之间摇摆。这就产生了一种新的照顾组合,在这种组合中,国家提供的社会保护薄弱,使市场参与者能够更深入地渗透。为了应对不断变化的福利格局,从农民转变为城市居民的人不得不不断地在高度流动性和稳定性之间做出权衡:他们遵循工厂的季节性招聘节奏,这提供了灵活的工资,阻碍了福利的参与;或者他们坚持福利制度的规定,要求长期呆在工厂,拿着低工资。因此,工人和他们的家庭要么依靠不稳定的收入来保障他们的未来,要么参加社会保护计划,并结合投机金融活动,如利用住房公积金和减息抵押贷款。因此,人们对土地、劳动力和金钱日益商品化的反应,来自于他们的日常实践和照料安排。换句话说,人们对不安全状况的反应仍然与造成不安全状况的福利结构纠缠在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
DIALECTICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
DIALECTICAL ANTHROPOLOGY ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Dialectical Anthropology is an international journal that seeks to invigorate discussion among left intellectuals by publishing peer-reviewed articles, editorials, letters, reports from the field, political exchanges, and book reviews. The journal aims to foster open debate through criticism, research and commentary from across the social sciences and humanities. It provides a forum for work with a pronounced dialectical approach to social theory and political practice for scholars, public intellectuals, and activists who are interested in Marxism and political-economy. The journal also welcomes submissions from those who wish to be in dialogue or debate with these traditions. Since 1975, Dialectical Anthropology has been dedicated to working towards the transformation of class society through internationalizing conversations that focus on crises of capitalism and the means for social change. The format of Dialectical Anthropology is shaped by these goals. Submissions accepted for peer review are sent to scholars, public intellectuals and activists whose comments are often published along with replies by the manuscript author to engender a dialogic exchange. The " Forum" is also dedicated to reciprocal engagement as scholars, public intellectuals and activists are invited to respond to forum statements meant to provoke debate and discussion. These exchanges provide space for dialectical engagement from a broad range of perspectives about significant issues of our time, Finally, while the book review section follows the traditional 1000 word format, Dialectical Anthropology encourages the submission of substantial essays that comparatively analyze multiple books, films, novels and other texts to contextualize them within contemporary politics, economics, society and culture. Dialectical Anthropology invites contributions from authors committed to international political engagement across disciplinary divides, communities of practice, and oppositional political traditions by encouraging contributions from authors who seek to combine theories and practices of social change. The journal is committed to reaching beyond an Anglophone readership and encourages submissions, dialogue and active participation in languages other than English. The journal will publish these submissions to the extent that its resources and capabilities allow. Manuscripts should be submitted electronically via the Springer Website at http://dial.edmgr.com and should include abstract, five keywords, and three suggested reviewers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信