Stopping aggressive treatment or hoping for a miracle: an analysis of spiritual care messages for terminally ill patients using the National Survey of religious leaders.

IF 1.8 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Kelly E Tenzek, Suzanne S Sullivan
{"title":"Stopping aggressive treatment or hoping for a miracle: an analysis of spiritual care messages for terminally ill patients using the National Survey of religious leaders.","authors":"Kelly E Tenzek, Suzanne S Sullivan","doi":"10.1080/08854726.2025.2558294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Religious and spiritual needs are important for seriously ill patients. Conflicting evidence for who provides this care and how it fits into the biomedical context remains. Quantitative analysis of the National Study of Religious Leaders (NSRL) survey data (N = 1600) resulted in three statistically significant logistic regression models. Conflicts with scientific beliefs, openness to changing beliefs based on scientific findings, and race/ethnicity were associated with religious leaders' recommendations related to stopping curative treatment. Multiple factors such as belief in miraculous healing, the prosperity gospel, and openness to changing beliefs based on scientific findings, were associated with hoping for a miracle. How often a clergy visited a terminally ill person in the last 12 months, and their educational attainment were associated with discussing palliative care. Results highlight the opportunity for additional care coordination and education among religious clergy, professional chaplains and clinical providers in EOL contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":45330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08854726.2025.2558294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Religious and spiritual needs are important for seriously ill patients. Conflicting evidence for who provides this care and how it fits into the biomedical context remains. Quantitative analysis of the National Study of Religious Leaders (NSRL) survey data (N = 1600) resulted in three statistically significant logistic regression models. Conflicts with scientific beliefs, openness to changing beliefs based on scientific findings, and race/ethnicity were associated with religious leaders' recommendations related to stopping curative treatment. Multiple factors such as belief in miraculous healing, the prosperity gospel, and openness to changing beliefs based on scientific findings, were associated with hoping for a miracle. How often a clergy visited a terminally ill person in the last 12 months, and their educational attainment were associated with discussing palliative care. Results highlight the opportunity for additional care coordination and education among religious clergy, professional chaplains and clinical providers in EOL contexts.

停止激进治疗还是期待奇迹:利用全国宗教领袖调查对绝症患者的精神关怀信息进行分析。
宗教和精神需求对重病患者很重要。关于谁提供这种护理以及它如何适应生物医学背景,仍然存在相互矛盾的证据。对全国宗教领袖研究(NSRL)调查数据(N = 1600)进行定量分析,得出三个具有统计学意义的逻辑回归模型。与科学信仰的冲突、对基于科学发现改变信仰的开放态度以及种族/民族与宗教领袖关于停止治疗的建议有关。许多因素,如相信神奇的治疗,成功福音,以及基于科学发现改变信仰的开放性,都与希望奇迹有关。神职人员在过去12个月内探望绝症患者的频率,以及他们的教育程度与讨论姑息治疗有关。结果强调了在EOL背景下,宗教神职人员、专业牧师和临床提供者之间进行额外护理协调和教育的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy
Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
21.10%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy publishes peer-reviewed, scholarly articles based on original research, quality assurance/improvement studies, descriptions of programs and interventions, program/intervention evaluations, and literature reviews on topics pertinent to pastoral/spiritual care, clinical pastoral education, chaplaincy, and spirituality in relation to physical and mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信