Identifying research priorities in clubfoot management through a Delphi process : a study protocol.

IF 3.1 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Anne Elizabeth McNee, Elizabeth Ashby, Amanda Trees, Emily Baird, Donald M Campbell, Yael Gelfer
{"title":"Identifying research priorities in clubfoot management through a Delphi process : a study protocol.","authors":"Anne Elizabeth McNee, Elizabeth Ashby, Amanda Trees, Emily Baird, Donald M Campbell, Yael Gelfer","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.69.BJO-2025-0103.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Clubfoot is the most common congenital foot deformity. Clubfoot management is lacking high-quality research to support clinical decision-making. It has been chosen as one of the elective priorities in research by the James Lind Alliance priority setting. We present the protocol of a consensus-based approach to identify research priorities for clinical trials in clubfoot management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Delphi technique will be used, which will involve an initial scoping survey, a two-round Delphi process, and a consensus meeting. The survey will be conducted among key stakeholders in the management of clubfoot, as well as patients and carers in the UK. The priorities identified during this process will each be assigned to core areas of consideration. The final list of research priorities will then be discussed and agreed in a consensus meeting of representative key stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While treatment of clubfoot has become more consistent with the use of the Ponseti method, most research is retrospective from single centres, and outcomes are variable. Identifying research priorities in this group of patients through this study will shape and drive the development of multicentre prospective clinical trials deemed most important for improving clinical practice and health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 9","pages":"1109-1114"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12433723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.69.BJO-2025-0103.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Clubfoot is the most common congenital foot deformity. Clubfoot management is lacking high-quality research to support clinical decision-making. It has been chosen as one of the elective priorities in research by the James Lind Alliance priority setting. We present the protocol of a consensus-based approach to identify research priorities for clinical trials in clubfoot management.

Methods: A modified Delphi technique will be used, which will involve an initial scoping survey, a two-round Delphi process, and a consensus meeting. The survey will be conducted among key stakeholders in the management of clubfoot, as well as patients and carers in the UK. The priorities identified during this process will each be assigned to core areas of consideration. The final list of research priorities will then be discussed and agreed in a consensus meeting of representative key stakeholders.

Conclusion: While treatment of clubfoot has become more consistent with the use of the Ponseti method, most research is retrospective from single centres, and outcomes are variable. Identifying research priorities in this group of patients through this study will shape and drive the development of multicentre prospective clinical trials deemed most important for improving clinical practice and health outcomes.

Abstract Image

通过德尔菲过程确定内翻足管理的研究重点:一项研究方案。
目的:内翻足是最常见的先天性足部畸形。内翻足的管理缺乏高质量的研究来支持临床决策。它已被詹姆斯林德联盟优先设置选为研究的选修优先事项之一。我们提出了一种基于共识的方法来确定临床试验中畸形足管理的研究重点。方法:将使用改进的德尔菲技术,包括初步范围调查、两轮德尔菲过程和共识会议。该调查将在英国内翻足管理的主要利益相关者以及患者和护理人员中进行。在此过程中确定的优先事项将分别分配给核心审议领域。最终的研究重点清单将在关键利益相关者代表的协商一致会议上讨论和商定。结论:虽然使用Ponseti方法治疗内翻足已经变得更加一致,但大多数研究都是来自单个中心的回顾性研究,结果是可变的。通过这项研究确定这组患者的研究重点将塑造和推动多中心前瞻性临床试验的发展,这些试验被认为是改善临床实践和健康结果最重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信