Cross-comparison study of three ELISA methodologies to measure Shigella Sonnei O-antigen serum IgG.

IF 3.1 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
mSphere Pub Date : 2025-09-15 DOI:10.1128/msphere.00356-25
Paul Stickings, Caroline Vipond, Peter Rigsby, Francesca Micoli, Omar Rossi, Francesca Mancini, Valentino Conti, Dani Cohen, Anya Bialik, Shiri Meron-Sudai, Valeria Asato, Kristen A Clarkson, Calman A MacLennan, Robert W Kaminski
{"title":"Cross-comparison study of three ELISA methodologies to measure <i>Shigella Sonnei</i> O-antigen serum IgG.","authors":"Paul Stickings, Caroline Vipond, Peter Rigsby, Francesca Micoli, Omar Rossi, Francesca Mancini, Valentino Conti, Dani Cohen, Anya Bialik, Shiri Meron-Sudai, Valeria Asato, Kristen A Clarkson, Calman A MacLennan, Robert W Kaminski","doi":"10.1128/msphere.00356-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measurement of serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) to <i>Shigella</i> lipopolysaccharide (LPS) has been proposed as a correlate of protection against shigellosis, the confirmation of which in the target population of infants in low- and middle-income countries will facilitate vaccine development and licensure. Data obtained from <i>Shigella sonnei</i> vaccine clinical studies have identified a protective serum LPS IgG threshold value that is assay-specific. In the interim period before an International Standard serum was available, a retrospective bridging study using a panel of human serum samples had been conducted to estimate the anti-<i>S</i>. <i>sonnei</i> LPS IgG levels in two ELISA methods, employed in several ongoing or recently completed age-descending <i>Shigella</i> vaccine clinical studies that correspond to the threshold titer of 1,600 established using the Tel Aviv University ELISA method. Each lab performed its own in-house ELISA protocol and tested a panel of 32 human serum samples, covering a range of anti-<i>S</i>. <i>sonnei</i> LPS IgG levels. We observed excellent correlation of the ELISA data between the laboratories and used the fitted equations from regression analysis to determine the values that correspond to an endpoint titer of 1,600 in the Tel Aviv University ELISA method. Our analysis provides a way to meaningfully compare results obtained with clinical samples across the ELISA methods used by the three participating laboratories.<b>IMPORTANCE</b>To support large-scale efficacy trials, especially where efficacy trials are not feasible, the ability to compare immune response data across candidate <i>Shigella</i> vaccines can be very valuable for identifying the most promising vaccine platform and immunobridging to other populations, vaccine formulations, or additional platforms in the future. However, international standards for antibody assays are not yet available for <i>Shigella</i> vaccines currently in clinical development. Lack of standardization of <i>Shigella</i> immunoassays means that the results of antibody measurement in clinical samples from different vaccine trials or those from seroepidemiology studies cannot be easily compared. The results from this study will facilitate the comparison of immunological titers obtained across different <i>Shigella</i> vaccine studies as an interim measure until such time that immunoassays can be better harmonized through the use of an International Standard Serum.</p>","PeriodicalId":19052,"journal":{"name":"mSphere","volume":" ","pages":"e0035625"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mSphere","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00356-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measurement of serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) to Shigella lipopolysaccharide (LPS) has been proposed as a correlate of protection against shigellosis, the confirmation of which in the target population of infants in low- and middle-income countries will facilitate vaccine development and licensure. Data obtained from Shigella sonnei vaccine clinical studies have identified a protective serum LPS IgG threshold value that is assay-specific. In the interim period before an International Standard serum was available, a retrospective bridging study using a panel of human serum samples had been conducted to estimate the anti-S. sonnei LPS IgG levels in two ELISA methods, employed in several ongoing or recently completed age-descending Shigella vaccine clinical studies that correspond to the threshold titer of 1,600 established using the Tel Aviv University ELISA method. Each lab performed its own in-house ELISA protocol and tested a panel of 32 human serum samples, covering a range of anti-S. sonnei LPS IgG levels. We observed excellent correlation of the ELISA data between the laboratories and used the fitted equations from regression analysis to determine the values that correspond to an endpoint titer of 1,600 in the Tel Aviv University ELISA method. Our analysis provides a way to meaningfully compare results obtained with clinical samples across the ELISA methods used by the three participating laboratories.IMPORTANCETo support large-scale efficacy trials, especially where efficacy trials are not feasible, the ability to compare immune response data across candidate Shigella vaccines can be very valuable for identifying the most promising vaccine platform and immunobridging to other populations, vaccine formulations, or additional platforms in the future. However, international standards for antibody assays are not yet available for Shigella vaccines currently in clinical development. Lack of standardization of Shigella immunoassays means that the results of antibody measurement in clinical samples from different vaccine trials or those from seroepidemiology studies cannot be easily compared. The results from this study will facilitate the comparison of immunological titers obtained across different Shigella vaccine studies as an interim measure until such time that immunoassays can be better harmonized through the use of an International Standard Serum.

三种ELISA方法测定索内志贺氏菌o型抗原血清IgG的交叉比较研究。
血清免疫球蛋白G (IgG)对志贺氏菌脂多糖(LPS)的测定已被认为是预防志贺氏菌病的相关指标,在低收入和中等收入国家的目标婴儿人群中证实这一点将促进疫苗的开发和许可。从索内志贺氏菌疫苗临床研究中获得的数据已经确定了一种检测特异性的保护性血清LPS IgG阈值。在获得国际标准血清之前的过渡时期,使用一组人类血清样本进行了回顾性桥接研究,以估计抗s。sonnei LPS IgG水平在两种ELISA方法中,用于几个正在进行或最近完成的年龄下降志贺氏菌疫苗临床研究,对应于使用特拉维夫大学ELISA方法建立的阈值滴度为1600。每个实验室都执行自己的ELISA方案,并测试了一组32个人类血清样本,涵盖了一系列抗s。sonnei LPS IgG水平。我们观察到实验室之间的ELISA数据具有良好的相关性,并使用回归分析的拟合方程来确定特拉维夫大学ELISA方法的终点滴度为1600的值。我们的分析提供了一种有意义的方法,通过三个参与实验室使用的ELISA方法与临床样品进行比较。为了支持大规模疗效试验,特别是在疗效试验不可行的情况下,比较候选志贺氏菌疫苗的免疫应答数据的能力对于确定最有希望的疫苗平台以及未来与其他人群、疫苗配方或其他平台的免疫桥接非常有价值。然而,目前尚没有针对临床开发中的志贺氏菌疫苗的抗体测定的国际标准。志贺氏菌免疫测定缺乏标准化,这意味着来自不同疫苗试验或血清流行病学研究的临床样本的抗体测量结果不能容易地进行比较。这项研究的结果将有助于比较不同志贺氏菌疫苗研究中获得的免疫滴度,作为一种临时措施,直到免疫测定能够通过使用国际标准血清更好地协调一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
mSphere
mSphere Immunology and Microbiology-Microbiology
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
192
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: mSphere™ is a multi-disciplinary open-access journal that will focus on rapid publication of fundamental contributions to our understanding of microbiology. Its scope will reflect the immense range of fields within the microbial sciences, creating new opportunities for researchers to share findings that are transforming our understanding of human health and disease, ecosystems, neuroscience, agriculture, energy production, climate change, evolution, biogeochemical cycling, and food and drug production. Submissions will be encouraged of all high-quality work that makes fundamental contributions to our understanding of microbiology. mSphere™ will provide streamlined decisions, while carrying on ASM''s tradition for rigorous peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信