Stereotactic body radiation therapy in oligometastatic pancreatic cancer: overall survival improvement and SMAD4 as a predictor of progression-free survival.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Journal of gastrointestinal oncology Pub Date : 2025-08-30 Epub Date: 2025-08-26 DOI:10.21037/jgo-2025-100
Ahmed Elhariri, Jaydeepbhai Patel, Himil Mahadevia, Karnav Modi, Douaa Albelal, Umair Majeed, Jeremy C Jones, Mitesh J Borad, Nguyen H Tran, Michael S Rutenberg, Hani Babiker
{"title":"Stereotactic body radiation therapy in oligometastatic pancreatic cancer: overall survival improvement and <i>SMAD4</i> as a predictor of progression-free survival.","authors":"Ahmed Elhariri, Jaydeepbhai Patel, Himil Mahadevia, Karnav Modi, Douaa Albelal, Umair Majeed, Jeremy C Jones, Mitesh J Borad, Nguyen H Tran, Michael S Rutenberg, Hani Babiker","doi":"10.21037/jgo-2025-100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 5-year overall survival (OS) for stage IV pancreatic cancer is dismal despite aggressive systemic therapy. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) involves delivering precise, highly conformal, and biologically effective doses of radiation via a linear accelerator to the tumor region. Clinical trials have shown improvement in OS and progression-free survival (PFS) with SBRT plus standard chemotherapy in oligometastatic (<5 metastatic lesions) solid tumors such as breast, lung, colorectal, and prostate cancers, when compared to chemotherapy alone. Factors predicting response to SBRT need to be further explored in oligometastatic pancreatic cancer (oPC). The study aims to assess the role of SBRT in the management of patients with oPC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of oPC patients treated at the Mayo Clinic during the period from January 2012 to January 2022, who underwent SBRT to at least one site, including the primary site and/or sites of metastases, received at least 4 months of chemotherapy, and had a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Pertinent data were collected from the electronic health records after institutional review board (IRB) approval. The response rates (RRs) were assessed using the RECIST v1.1 criteria, and the PFS and OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox regression was used to determine a statistically significant correlation between treatment and genomic characteristics with OS and PFS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one patients with oPC were identified, among whom 38% were female. Eighty-seven percent were Caucasian, and 13% were other ethnicities (African American, Hispanic, and Asian). The median age was 66 years. Patients received gemcitabine (gem) or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) based chemotherapy. Eight-five percent of patients received chemotherapy within 3 months of SBRT and the median follow-up time of 16 months. The RR was 25% in the primary lesion and 17% in metastatic lesions. SBRT to primary pancreas lesion correlated with higher OS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.082-0.89, P=0.03] but showed no difference in PFS (HR: 0.97, P=0.95) when compared to SBRT to any other metastatic site. SBRT to liver metastases had no improvement in OS (P=0.92) or PFS (P=0.70) versus SBRT to other metastatic sites. The type of chemotherapy (gem <i>vs</i>. 5-FU based) alongside SBRT within 3 months did not influence OS (P=0.47) or PFS (P=0.62) in these patients. Among 30 patients who underwent circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA) testing, <i>SMAD4</i> gene alteration correlated with significantly higher PFS (HR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.065-0.87, P=0.03) but had no relation with OS (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.18-2.03, P=0.41) compared to patients with undetectable <i>SMAD4</i> alteration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SBRT plus chemotherapy may have benefits in some patients with oPC. SBRT to primary pancreas lesion led to better OS compared with SBRT to other metastatic sites. <i>SMAD4</i> alteration in ctDNA testing correlated with higher PFS in oPC patients who received SBRT. This implies a potential role for genomic biomarker-based patient selection in oPC. These findings are currently being studied in a randomized clinical trial evaluating SBRT plus chemotherapy in oPC (NCT04975516).</p>","PeriodicalId":15841,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gastrointestinal oncology","volume":"16 4","pages":"1658-1666"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12432913/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gastrointestinal oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-2025-100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The 5-year overall survival (OS) for stage IV pancreatic cancer is dismal despite aggressive systemic therapy. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) involves delivering precise, highly conformal, and biologically effective doses of radiation via a linear accelerator to the tumor region. Clinical trials have shown improvement in OS and progression-free survival (PFS) with SBRT plus standard chemotherapy in oligometastatic (<5 metastatic lesions) solid tumors such as breast, lung, colorectal, and prostate cancers, when compared to chemotherapy alone. Factors predicting response to SBRT need to be further explored in oligometastatic pancreatic cancer (oPC). The study aims to assess the role of SBRT in the management of patients with oPC.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of oPC patients treated at the Mayo Clinic during the period from January 2012 to January 2022, who underwent SBRT to at least one site, including the primary site and/or sites of metastases, received at least 4 months of chemotherapy, and had a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Pertinent data were collected from the electronic health records after institutional review board (IRB) approval. The response rates (RRs) were assessed using the RECIST v1.1 criteria, and the PFS and OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox regression was used to determine a statistically significant correlation between treatment and genomic characteristics with OS and PFS.

Results: Sixty-one patients with oPC were identified, among whom 38% were female. Eighty-seven percent were Caucasian, and 13% were other ethnicities (African American, Hispanic, and Asian). The median age was 66 years. Patients received gemcitabine (gem) or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) based chemotherapy. Eight-five percent of patients received chemotherapy within 3 months of SBRT and the median follow-up time of 16 months. The RR was 25% in the primary lesion and 17% in metastatic lesions. SBRT to primary pancreas lesion correlated with higher OS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.082-0.89, P=0.03] but showed no difference in PFS (HR: 0.97, P=0.95) when compared to SBRT to any other metastatic site. SBRT to liver metastases had no improvement in OS (P=0.92) or PFS (P=0.70) versus SBRT to other metastatic sites. The type of chemotherapy (gem vs. 5-FU based) alongside SBRT within 3 months did not influence OS (P=0.47) or PFS (P=0.62) in these patients. Among 30 patients who underwent circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA) testing, SMAD4 gene alteration correlated with significantly higher PFS (HR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.065-0.87, P=0.03) but had no relation with OS (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.18-2.03, P=0.41) compared to patients with undetectable SMAD4 alteration.

Conclusions: SBRT plus chemotherapy may have benefits in some patients with oPC. SBRT to primary pancreas lesion led to better OS compared with SBRT to other metastatic sites. SMAD4 alteration in ctDNA testing correlated with higher PFS in oPC patients who received SBRT. This implies a potential role for genomic biomarker-based patient selection in oPC. These findings are currently being studied in a randomized clinical trial evaluating SBRT plus chemotherapy in oPC (NCT04975516).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

立体定向放射治疗低转移性胰腺癌:总生存改善和SMAD4作为无进展生存的预测因子
背景:尽管进行了积极的全身治疗,IV期胰腺癌的5年总生存率(OS)仍然很低。立体定向全身放射治疗(SBRT)包括通过线性加速器向肿瘤区域提供精确、高度适形和生物有效剂量的辐射。临床试验显示,SBRT +标准化疗可改善少转移患者的OS和无进展生存期(PFS)。方法:我们对2012年1月至2022年1月期间在梅奥诊所接受治疗的oPC患者进行了回顾性队列研究,这些患者接受了至少一个部位的SBRT,包括原发部位和/或转移部位,接受了至少4个月的化疗,并进行了至少1年的随访。经机构审查委员会(IRB)批准,从电子健康记录中收集相关数据。采用RECIST v1.1标准评估反应率(rr),采用Kaplan-Meier法计算PFS和OS。使用多变量Cox回归来确定治疗与基因组特征与OS和PFS之间具有统计学意义的相关性。结果:共发现61例oPC患者,其中38%为女性。87%是白种人,13%是其他种族(非裔美国人、西班牙裔和亚洲人)。平均年龄为66岁。患者接受吉西他滨(gem)或5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)化疗。85%的患者在SBRT后3个月内接受了化疗,中位随访时间为16个月。原发病变的RR为25%,转移病变的RR为17%。原发性胰腺病变的SBRT与更高的OS相关[风险比(HR): 0.27, 95%可信区间(CI): 0.082-0.89, P=0.03],但与任何其他转移部位的SBRT相比,PFS没有差异(HR: 0.97, P=0.95)。与其他转移部位的SBRT相比,肝转移的SBRT没有改善OS (P=0.92)或PFS (P=0.70)。3个月内联合SBRT的化疗类型(gem vs. 5-FU)对这些患者的OS (P=0.47)或PFS (P=0.62)没有影响。在30例接受循环肿瘤脱氧核酸(ctDNA)检测的患者中,与未检测到SMAD4基因改变的患者相比,SMAD4基因改变与更高的PFS (HR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.065-0.87, P=0.03)相关,但与OS无关(HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.18-2.03, P=0.41)。结论:SBRT联合化疗可能对一些oPC患者有益。与其他转移部位的SBRT相比,原发性胰腺病变的SBRT可获得更好的OS。在接受SBRT的oPC患者中,ctDNA检测中的SMAD4改变与更高的PFS相关。这意味着基于基因组生物标志物的患者选择在oPC中具有潜在的作用。这些发现目前正在一项评估SBRT加化疗治疗oPC的随机临床试验中进行研究(NCT04975516)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: ournal of Gastrointestinal Oncology (Print ISSN 2078-6891; Online ISSN 2219-679X; J Gastrointest Oncol; JGO), the official journal of Society for Gastrointestinal Oncology (SGO), is an open-access, international peer-reviewed journal. It is published quarterly (Sep. 2010- Dec. 2013), bimonthly (Feb. 2014 -) and openly distributed worldwide. JGO publishes manuscripts that focus on updated and practical information about diagnosis, prevention and clinical investigations of gastrointestinal cancer treatment. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, multimodality therapy, markers, imaging and tumor biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信