Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases in Women With Vasomotor Symptoms: A Secondary Analysis of the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Clinical Trials.

IF 23.3 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jacques E Rossouw, Aaron K Aragaki, JoAnn E Manson, Emily D Szmuilowicz, Laura B Harrington, Karen C Johnson, Matthew Allison, Bernhard Haring, Nazmus Saquib, Aladdin H Shadyab, Kathryn M Rexrode, Longjian Liu, Charles P Mouton, Andrea Z LaCroix
{"title":"Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases in Women With Vasomotor Symptoms: A Secondary Analysis of the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Clinical Trials.","authors":"Jacques E Rossouw, Aaron K Aragaki, JoAnn E Manson, Emily D Szmuilowicz, Laura B Harrington, Karen C Johnson, Matthew Allison, Bernhard Haring, Nazmus Saquib, Aladdin H Shadyab, Kathryn M Rexrode, Longjian Liu, Charles P Mouton, Andrea Z LaCroix","doi":"10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.4510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Identification of appropriate patients for treatment of vasomotor symptoms (VMS) with menopausal hormone therapy (HT) is challenging.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to HT in women with VMS.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>In this secondary analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials of HT, postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 years from 40 US clinical centers were included. Data were collected from November 1993 to September 2012, and data were analyzed from December 2024 to May 2025.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Conjugated equine estrogens (CEE), 0.625 mg per day, or CEE with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), 2.5 mg per day, vs placebo.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD; defined as composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization for angina, coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke, peripheral arterial disease, carotid artery disease, or CVD death).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 27 347 included postmenopausal women, the mean (SD) age was 63.4 (7.2) years; a total of 10 739 (39.3%) had a hysterectomy, and 16 608 (60.7%) had an intact uterus. The median (IQR) follow-up was 7.2 (6.4-8.1) years and 5.6 (4.8-6.5) years for those in the CEE alone trial and the CEE plus MPA trial, respectively. In the CEE alone trial, moderate or severe VMS were present at baseline in 905 (27.6%), 705 (14.7%), and 220 (8.7%) women aged 50 to 59 years, 60 to 69 years, and 70 to 79 years, respectively; in the CEE plus MPA trial, moderate or severe VMS was present in 1225 (22.4%), 649 (8.7%), and 172 (4.8%), respectively. Among women with moderate or severe VMS at enrollment, 3382 (96.7%) recalled having symptoms near menopause onset. CEE alone reduced VMS by 41% across all age groups (overall relative risk [RR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.53-0.66). However, in the CEE plus MPA trial, VMS reduction was attenuated with age (age 50-59 years: RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.35-0.48; age 60-69 years: RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61-0.85; age 70-79 years: RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.91-1.59; interaction P for trend < .001). Both CEE alone and CEE plus MPA appeared to have neutral effects on ASCVD in women with moderate or severe VMS aged 50 to 59 years (CEE alone: hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.53-1.35; CEE plus MPA: HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.44-1.57). While the estimated risk was higher for CEE alone in women with VMS aged 60 to 69 years, there was no clear signal of harm (CEE alone: HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.90-1.90; CEE plus MPA: HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.51-1.39). However, women with VMS 70 years and older had increased risks of ASCVD (CEE alone: HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.06-3.59; 217 excess events per 10 000 person-years; interaction P for trend = .03; CEE plus MPA: HR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.36-7.63; 382 excess events per 10 000 person-years; interaction P for trend = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this secondary analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials, among younger postmenopausal women aged 50 to 59 years, both CEE alone and CEE plus MPA reduced VMS without significantly affecting ASCVD risk. In women with VMS 70 years and older, risks for ASCVD were increased in both trials. The findings support guideline recommendations for treatment of VMS with HT in women aged 50 to 59 years, caution if initiating HT in women aged 60 to 69 years, and avoidance of HT in women 70 years and older.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000611.</p>","PeriodicalId":14714,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":23.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.4510","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Identification of appropriate patients for treatment of vasomotor symptoms (VMS) with menopausal hormone therapy (HT) is challenging.

Objective: To assess risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to HT in women with VMS.

Design, setting, and participants: In this secondary analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials of HT, postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 years from 40 US clinical centers were included. Data were collected from November 1993 to September 2012, and data were analyzed from December 2024 to May 2025.

Interventions: Conjugated equine estrogens (CEE), 0.625 mg per day, or CEE with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), 2.5 mg per day, vs placebo.

Main outcomes and measures: Atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD; defined as composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization for angina, coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke, peripheral arterial disease, carotid artery disease, or CVD death).

Results: Of 27 347 included postmenopausal women, the mean (SD) age was 63.4 (7.2) years; a total of 10 739 (39.3%) had a hysterectomy, and 16 608 (60.7%) had an intact uterus. The median (IQR) follow-up was 7.2 (6.4-8.1) years and 5.6 (4.8-6.5) years for those in the CEE alone trial and the CEE plus MPA trial, respectively. In the CEE alone trial, moderate or severe VMS were present at baseline in 905 (27.6%), 705 (14.7%), and 220 (8.7%) women aged 50 to 59 years, 60 to 69 years, and 70 to 79 years, respectively; in the CEE plus MPA trial, moderate or severe VMS was present in 1225 (22.4%), 649 (8.7%), and 172 (4.8%), respectively. Among women with moderate or severe VMS at enrollment, 3382 (96.7%) recalled having symptoms near menopause onset. CEE alone reduced VMS by 41% across all age groups (overall relative risk [RR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.53-0.66). However, in the CEE plus MPA trial, VMS reduction was attenuated with age (age 50-59 years: RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.35-0.48; age 60-69 years: RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61-0.85; age 70-79 years: RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.91-1.59; interaction P for trend < .001). Both CEE alone and CEE plus MPA appeared to have neutral effects on ASCVD in women with moderate or severe VMS aged 50 to 59 years (CEE alone: hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.53-1.35; CEE plus MPA: HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.44-1.57). While the estimated risk was higher for CEE alone in women with VMS aged 60 to 69 years, there was no clear signal of harm (CEE alone: HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.90-1.90; CEE plus MPA: HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.51-1.39). However, women with VMS 70 years and older had increased risks of ASCVD (CEE alone: HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.06-3.59; 217 excess events per 10 000 person-years; interaction P for trend = .03; CEE plus MPA: HR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.36-7.63; 382 excess events per 10 000 person-years; interaction P for trend = .02).

Conclusions and relevance: In this secondary analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials, among younger postmenopausal women aged 50 to 59 years, both CEE alone and CEE plus MPA reduced VMS without significantly affecting ASCVD risk. In women with VMS 70 years and older, risks for ASCVD were increased in both trials. The findings support guideline recommendations for treatment of VMS with HT in women aged 50 to 59 years, caution if initiating HT in women aged 60 to 69 years, and avoidance of HT in women 70 years and older.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000611.

绝经期激素治疗和血管舒缩症状妇女的心血管疾病:妇女健康倡议随机临床试验的二次分析
重要性:确定绝经期激素治疗血管舒缩症状(VMS)的合适患者是具有挑战性的。目的:评估女性VMS患者HT所致心血管疾病(CVD)的风险。设计、环境和参与者:在这项对两项HT随机临床试验的二次分析中,纳入了来自美国40个临床中心的年龄在50 - 79岁的绝经后妇女。数据收集时间为1993年11月至2012年9月,分析时间为2024年12月至2025年5月。干预措施:偶联马雌激素(CEE), 0.625 mg /天,或CEE与醋酸甲孕酮(MPA), 2.5 mg /天,vs安慰剂。主要结局和指标:动脉粥样硬化性CVD (ASCVD,定义为非致死性心肌梗死、心绞痛住院、冠状动脉血运重建术、缺血性卒中、外周动脉疾病、颈动脉疾病或CVD死亡的复合)。结果:27例 347例绝经后妇女,平均(SD)年龄为63.4(7.2)岁;10例 739例(39.3%)子宫切除,16例 608例(60.7%)子宫完整。CEE单独试验和CEE加MPA试验的中位随访(IQR)分别为7.2(6.4-8.1)年和5.6(4.8-6.5)年。在单独的CEE试验中,分别有905名(27.6%)、705名(14.7%)和220名(8.7%)女性在50至59岁、60至69岁和70至79岁时出现中度或重度VMS;在CEE + MPA试验中,中度或重度VMS分别出现1225例(22.4%)、649例(8.7%)和172例(4.8%)。在入组时患有中度或重度VMS的女性中,3382名(96.7%)回忆起在绝经前出现症状。在所有年龄组中,CEE单独降低了41%的VMS(总体相对风险[RR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.53-0.66)。然而,在CEE + MPA试验中,VMS的减少随着年龄的增长而减弱(50-59岁:RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.35-0.48; 60-69岁:RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61-0.85; 70-79岁:RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.91-1.59;趋势的相互作用P)结论和相关性:在2个随机临床试验的二次分析中,在50-59岁的年轻绝经后妇女中,CEE单独和CEE + MPA均可减少VMS,但未显著影响ASCVD风险。在70岁及以上的VMS患者中,ASCVD的风险在两项试验中都有所增加。研究结果支持指南建议:50 - 59岁女性使用HT治疗VMS, 60 - 69岁女性使用HT时要谨慎,70岁及以上女性避免使用HT。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT00000611。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Internal Medicine
JAMA Internal Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
43.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
371
期刊介绍: JAMA Internal Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed journal committed to advancing the field of internal medicine worldwide. With a focus on four core priorities—clinical relevance, clinical practice change, credibility, and effective communication—the journal aims to provide indispensable and trustworthy peer-reviewed evidence. Catering to academics, clinicians, educators, researchers, and trainees across the entire spectrum of internal medicine, including general internal medicine and subspecialties, JAMA Internal Medicine publishes innovative and clinically relevant research. The journal strives to deliver stimulating articles that educate and inform readers with the latest research findings, driving positive change in healthcare systems and patient care delivery. As a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed medical publications, JAMA Internal Medicine plays a pivotal role in shaping the discourse and advancing patient care in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信