Bipolar Catheter Ablation as a Key for Successful Treatment of Intramural VentricuLar Arrhythmias: Results From the Bipolar-Kiel Study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Fabian Moser, Vera Maslova, Adrian Zaman, Thomas Demming, Martina Spehlmann, Mohammed Saad, Derk Frank, Evgeny Lian
{"title":"Bipolar Catheter Ablation as a Key for Successful Treatment of Intramural VentricuLar Arrhythmias: Results From the Bipolar-Kiel Study.","authors":"Fabian Moser, Vera Maslova, Adrian Zaman, Thomas Demming, Martina Spehlmann, Mohammed Saad, Derk Frank, Evgeny Lian","doi":"10.1111/jce.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unipolar catheter ablation (CA) is effective in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias but its efficacy can be limited in eliminating intramural arrhythmic origins. Bipolar ablation has emerged as a bail-out strategy. However, currently, it is being primarily utilized after a failed ablation attempt.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of endocardial and/or epicardial bipolar catheter ablation in patients with ventricular arrhythmias within their first procedure or after a previously failed ablation attempt.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Patients who underwent bipolar CA between September 2022 and February 2025 were included. A total of 21 bipolar ablation procedures were performed in 19 patients (median age 66 ± 11, 11% female, median ejection fraction 42% ± 16%). In total, 16 procedures were performed due to ventricular tachycardia (VT) or VT storm, five procedures were performed due to symptomatic premature ventricular contractions (PVC). In 48% of all cases, ablation was performed within the patient's first procedure. The interventricular septum was the most common site of bipolar ablation (11/21), followed by epi-endocardial bipolar ablation procedures (9/21) and the papillary muscle (1/21). Bipolar ablation was successful in 17/21 patients. In one patient, AV block occurred after bipolar ablation. During a median follow-up time of 12 ± 6 months, four patients with initially acute procedural success experienced recurrence of a ventricular arrhythmia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bipolar catheter ablation is an effective tool for arrhythmias with an intramural origin. It is shown to be safe with a high acute success rate in patients undergoing their first or redo procedure for VT or PVC.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.70018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Unipolar catheter ablation (CA) is effective in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias but its efficacy can be limited in eliminating intramural arrhythmic origins. Bipolar ablation has emerged as a bail-out strategy. However, currently, it is being primarily utilized after a failed ablation attempt.

Objective: The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of endocardial and/or epicardial bipolar catheter ablation in patients with ventricular arrhythmias within their first procedure or after a previously failed ablation attempt.

Methods and results: Patients who underwent bipolar CA between September 2022 and February 2025 were included. A total of 21 bipolar ablation procedures were performed in 19 patients (median age 66 ± 11, 11% female, median ejection fraction 42% ± 16%). In total, 16 procedures were performed due to ventricular tachycardia (VT) or VT storm, five procedures were performed due to symptomatic premature ventricular contractions (PVC). In 48% of all cases, ablation was performed within the patient's first procedure. The interventricular septum was the most common site of bipolar ablation (11/21), followed by epi-endocardial bipolar ablation procedures (9/21) and the papillary muscle (1/21). Bipolar ablation was successful in 17/21 patients. In one patient, AV block occurred after bipolar ablation. During a median follow-up time of 12 ± 6 months, four patients with initially acute procedural success experienced recurrence of a ventricular arrhythmia.

Conclusion: Bipolar catheter ablation is an effective tool for arrhythmias with an intramural origin. It is shown to be safe with a high acute success rate in patients undergoing their first or redo procedure for VT or PVC.

双极导管消融是成功治疗室性心律失常的关键:来自双极-基尔研究的结果。
背景:单极导管消融(CA)是治疗室性心律失常的有效方法,但其在消除室性心律失常根源方面的疗效有限。双极消融已成为一种纾困策略。然而,目前,它主要用于消融失败后的治疗。目的:本研究的目的是评估心内膜和/或心外膜双极导管消融在室性心律失常患者第一次手术或先前消融失败后的安全性和有效性。方法和结果:纳入了2022年9月至2025年2月期间接受双相CA的患者。19例患者共接受21次双极消融术(中位年龄66±11岁,女性11%,中位射血分数42%±16%)。共有16例因室性心动过速(VT)或VT风暴而行手术,5例因症状性室性早搏(PVC)而行手术。在48%的病例中,消融是在患者的第一次手术中进行的。室间隔是双极消融术最常见的部位(11/21),其次是心内膜外双极消融术(9/21)和乳头肌(1/21)。21例患者中有17例双极消融术成功。一名患者在双极消融术后出现房室传导阻滞。在12±6个月的中位随访期间,4例初始急性手术成功的患者再次发生室性心律失常。结论:双极导管消融是治疗室性心律失常的有效手段。它被证明是安全的,在接受第一次或重做VT或PVC手术的患者中具有很高的急性成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信