Targeted axillary dissection in breast cancer patients with metastatic nodal disease: a prospective study on localization techniques and oncological outcomes.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Gland surgery Pub Date : 2025-08-31 Epub Date: 2025-08-20 DOI:10.21037/gs-2025-166
Geok Hoon Lim, Aisha Masoud Al Shukairi, Yien Sien Lee, Sze Yiun Teo, Zhiyan Yan, Qing Ting Tan, Mihir Gudi, Ruey Pyng Ng, Fuh Yong Wong
{"title":"Targeted axillary dissection in breast cancer patients with metastatic nodal disease: a prospective study on localization techniques and oncological outcomes.","authors":"Geok Hoon Lim, Aisha Masoud Al Shukairi, Yien Sien Lee, Sze Yiun Teo, Zhiyan Yan, Qing Ting Tan, Mihir Gudi, Ruey Pyng Ng, Fuh Yong Wong","doi":"10.21037/gs-2025-166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by targeted axillary dissection (TAD) has been proposed as an alternative to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer patients with metastatic nodal disease. However, there is lack of standardization of TAD technique. This study aimed to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of various localization techniques in TAD and assess the oncological outcomes of TAD alone versus ALND.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Breast cancer patients with histologically proven nodal metastasis (T1-4N1-2M0) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included. Patients were divided into three groups: TAD-alone, TAD with ALND, and upfront ALND. Localization techniques used during TAD were assessed and oncological outcomes were compared between the TAD alone and ALND groups. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03878017).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and twenty-three patients, of which 18, 18, 87 underwent TAD alone, TAD with ALND and upfront ALND respectively, were included. All localization techniques, such as skin marking, Savi Scout and radio-guided occult lesion localization (ROLL) resulted in 100% retrieval of the marked node. Single-agent sentinel node localization during TAD was feasible. After a median follow-up of 13 and 23 months for the TAD-alone and ALND groups respectively, there were no significant differences in their oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Various localization techniques, including the less studied skin marking and ROLL, were effective in TAD. During TAD, single agent may be used for sentinel node localization. TAD alone did not have inferior oncologic outcomes on short term follow-up and may replace ALND in patients with complete nodal pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Our findings need validation in larger studies with longer follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":12760,"journal":{"name":"Gland surgery","volume":"14 8","pages":"1529-1538"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12432960/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gland surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-2025-166","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by targeted axillary dissection (TAD) has been proposed as an alternative to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer patients with metastatic nodal disease. However, there is lack of standardization of TAD technique. This study aimed to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of various localization techniques in TAD and assess the oncological outcomes of TAD alone versus ALND.

Methods: Breast cancer patients with histologically proven nodal metastasis (T1-4N1-2M0) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included. Patients were divided into three groups: TAD-alone, TAD with ALND, and upfront ALND. Localization techniques used during TAD were assessed and oncological outcomes were compared between the TAD alone and ALND groups. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03878017).

Results: One hundred and twenty-three patients, of which 18, 18, 87 underwent TAD alone, TAD with ALND and upfront ALND respectively, were included. All localization techniques, such as skin marking, Savi Scout and radio-guided occult lesion localization (ROLL) resulted in 100% retrieval of the marked node. Single-agent sentinel node localization during TAD was feasible. After a median follow-up of 13 and 23 months for the TAD-alone and ALND groups respectively, there were no significant differences in their oncological outcomes.

Conclusions: Various localization techniques, including the less studied skin marking and ROLL, were effective in TAD. During TAD, single agent may be used for sentinel node localization. TAD alone did not have inferior oncologic outcomes on short term follow-up and may replace ALND in patients with complete nodal pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Our findings need validation in larger studies with longer follow-up.

乳腺癌转移性淋巴结疾病患者的靶向腋窝清扫:定位技术和肿瘤学结果的前瞻性研究
背景:新辅助化疗后靶向腋窝清扫(TAD)已被提出作为乳腺癌转移性淋巴结清扫(ALND)的替代方案。然而,TAD技术缺乏标准化。本研究旨在前瞻性评估各种定位技术在TAD中的有效性,并评估单独TAD与ALND的肿瘤学结果。方法:组织学证实有淋巴结转移(T1-4N1-2M0)并接受新辅助化疗的乳腺癌患者。患者分为三组:单独使用TAD、TAD合并ALND和前期ALND。评估TAD期间使用的定位技术,并比较单独TAD组和ALND组的肿瘤结果。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(标识符:NCT03878017)。结果:共纳入123例患者,分别为单纯TAD 18例、TAD合并ALND 18例、TAD合并ALND 87例。所有的定位技术,如皮肤标记、Savi Scout和无线电引导隐匿病灶定位(ROLL),都能100%地恢复标记的淋巴结。TAD期间的单代理前哨节点定位是可行的。单独使用tad组和ALND组的中位随访时间分别为13个月和23个月,他们的肿瘤预后无显著差异。结论:各种定位技术,包括研究较少的皮肤标记和ROLL,对TAD有效。在TAD期间,可以使用单个代理进行前哨节点定位。在短期随访中,单独使用TAD没有较差的肿瘤预后,并且可以在新辅助化疗后完全淋巴结病理反应的患者中替代ALND。我们的发现需要在更大规模、更长的随访研究中得到验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gland surgery
Gland surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Gland Surgery (Gland Surg; GS, Print ISSN 2227-684X; Online ISSN 2227-8575) being indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central, is an open access, peer-review journal launched at May of 2012, published bio-monthly since February 2015.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信