Decoding fatal toxic effects in checkpoint inhibitor therapy using real-world pharmacovigilance data and machine learning.

IF 7.7 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Dongxue Yan, Beibei Lyu, Jie Yu, Siqi Bao, Zicheng Zhang, Meng Zhou, Jie Sun
{"title":"Decoding fatal toxic effects in checkpoint inhibitor therapy using real-world pharmacovigilance data and machine learning.","authors":"Dongxue Yan, Beibei Lyu, Jie Yu, Siqi Bao, Zicheng Zhang, Meng Zhou, Jie Sun","doi":"10.1111/bph.70195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improve cancer outcomes but are also associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which pose significant challenges for clinical management.</p><p><strong>Experimental approach: </strong>An observational pharmacovigilance analysis on FDA Adverse Event Reporting System was performed to identify ICI-related adverse event (AE) signals. Fatality kinetics simulation and multivariate logistic regression were used to investigate patterns of fatal AEs and multisignal involvement. A machine learning framework, SAFE-ICI, was developed to predict short-term risk and outcomes of fatal irAEs occurring within the first 90 days of ICI therapy.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>The analysis identified 358 significant AE signals associated with ICI therapies across 18 organ systems. PD-1/PD-L1 therapies were associated with 54 fatal irAEs, including 23 in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 5 in melanoma, 6 in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and 20 in other cancers. Combination therapies were associated with 20 fatal irAEs, including 3 in NSCLC, 6 in melanoma, 7 in RCC and 4 in other cancers, with stable involvement of multiple AE signals. The SAFE-ICI model demonstrated robust performance in predicting fatal irAE risk, successfully stratifying patients into low- and high-risk phenotypes with significantly different survival benefits, in both the discovery and holdout validation cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and implications: </strong>Our findings highlight the potential of machine learning to improve pharmacovigilance systems and aid clinicians in enhancing patient outcomes during ICI therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9262,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.70195","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improve cancer outcomes but are also associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which pose significant challenges for clinical management.

Experimental approach: An observational pharmacovigilance analysis on FDA Adverse Event Reporting System was performed to identify ICI-related adverse event (AE) signals. Fatality kinetics simulation and multivariate logistic regression were used to investigate patterns of fatal AEs and multisignal involvement. A machine learning framework, SAFE-ICI, was developed to predict short-term risk and outcomes of fatal irAEs occurring within the first 90 days of ICI therapy.

Key results: The analysis identified 358 significant AE signals associated with ICI therapies across 18 organ systems. PD-1/PD-L1 therapies were associated with 54 fatal irAEs, including 23 in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 5 in melanoma, 6 in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and 20 in other cancers. Combination therapies were associated with 20 fatal irAEs, including 3 in NSCLC, 6 in melanoma, 7 in RCC and 4 in other cancers, with stable involvement of multiple AE signals. The SAFE-ICI model demonstrated robust performance in predicting fatal irAE risk, successfully stratifying patients into low- and high-risk phenotypes with significantly different survival benefits, in both the discovery and holdout validation cohorts.

Conclusion and implications: Our findings highlight the potential of machine learning to improve pharmacovigilance systems and aid clinicians in enhancing patient outcomes during ICI therapy.

使用真实世界的药物警戒数据和机器学习解码检查点抑制剂治疗的致命毒性作用。
背景和目的:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)改善癌症预后,但也与免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)相关,这对临床管理构成了重大挑战。实验方法:对FDA不良事件报告系统进行观察性药物警戒分析,以识别ici相关的不良事件(AE)信号。病死率动力学模拟和多变量逻辑回归研究了致命ae和多信号累及的模式。开发了一个机器学习框架SAFE-ICI,用于预测在ICI治疗的前90天内发生致命性irae的短期风险和结果。主要结果:分析确定了18个器官系统中与ICI治疗相关的358个显著AE信号。PD-1/PD-L1治疗与54例致死性irae相关,其中23例为非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC), 5例为黑色素瘤,6例为肾细胞癌(RCC), 20例为其他癌症。联合治疗与20例致死性irae相关,包括3例NSCLC, 6例黑色素瘤,7例RCC和4例其他癌症,稳定涉及多种AE信号。SAFE-ICI模型在预测致命的irAE风险方面表现强劲,在发现和滞留验证队列中,成功地将患者分为低表型和高风险表型,具有显著不同的生存益处。结论和意义:我们的研究结果强调了机器学习在改善药物警戒系统和帮助临床医生提高ICI治疗期间患者预后方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.40
自引率
12.30%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.0 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Pharmacology (BJP) is a biomedical science journal offering comprehensive international coverage of experimental and translational pharmacology. It publishes original research, authoritative reviews, mini reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, databases, letters to the Editor, and commentaries. Review articles, databases, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses are typically commissioned, but unsolicited contributions are also considered, either as standalone papers or part of themed issues. In addition to basic science research, BJP features translational pharmacology research, including proof-of-concept and early mechanistic studies in humans. While it generally does not publish first-in-man phase I studies or phase IIb, III, or IV studies, exceptions may be made under certain circumstances, particularly if results are combined with preclinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信