Blood glucose trajectories in diabetes patients receiving CAPDCA model of personalised patient education: A cluster randomised controlled trial.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Jie Li, YuJiang Liu, Wei Xing, Yue Jiang
{"title":"Blood glucose trajectories in diabetes patients receiving CAPDCA model of personalised patient education: A cluster randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Jie Li, YuJiang Liu, Wei Xing, Yue Jiang","doi":"10.1111/dom.70119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The CAPDCA (Collection, Assessment, Plan, Do, Check, Aggrandisement) Model is a structured and individualised health education framework designed for dynamic adjustment and continuous improvement. This study evaluated its efficacy in diabetes management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted across 6 community health centres, involving 178 patients with type 2 diabetes. The intervention group (n = 90) received CAPDCA model education, while the control group (n = 88) received traditional education. The intervention spanned 18 months, with HbA1c collected at baseline and study end. Blood glucose was collected at each follow-up. Analysis used Group-Based Trajectory Model (GBTM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the control group, the intervention group showed: lower HbA1c (t = 6.356, p < 0.01) and greater HbA1c reduction (t = -6.117, p < 0.01). GBTM revealed distinct glucose trajectories: FBG had two trajectories (Steady descent group and rebound group). The 2 h-PG had three trajectories (High BG-high descent group, Medium BG-low descent group, and low BG-high descent group). All trajectories demonstrated that blood glucose levels reached clinically target ranges post-intervention. Baseline HbA1c influenced FBG trajectories, while baseline HbA1c and medication adherence influenced 2 h-PG trajectories. Age, gender, education, and disease duration showed no significant association with trajectories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CAPDCA model can effectively improve the control of HbA1c. The analysis of influencing factors of different trajectories suggested that the model was suitable for patients with different ages, genders, education levels, and disease duration. Further studies would be needed in exploring the application to various diseases and integrating the CAPDCA model with technologies such as artificial intelligence.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.70119","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The CAPDCA (Collection, Assessment, Plan, Do, Check, Aggrandisement) Model is a structured and individualised health education framework designed for dynamic adjustment and continuous improvement. This study evaluated its efficacy in diabetes management.

Methods: A cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted across 6 community health centres, involving 178 patients with type 2 diabetes. The intervention group (n = 90) received CAPDCA model education, while the control group (n = 88) received traditional education. The intervention spanned 18 months, with HbA1c collected at baseline and study end. Blood glucose was collected at each follow-up. Analysis used Group-Based Trajectory Model (GBTM).

Results: Compared with the control group, the intervention group showed: lower HbA1c (t = 6.356, p < 0.01) and greater HbA1c reduction (t = -6.117, p < 0.01). GBTM revealed distinct glucose trajectories: FBG had two trajectories (Steady descent group and rebound group). The 2 h-PG had three trajectories (High BG-high descent group, Medium BG-low descent group, and low BG-high descent group). All trajectories demonstrated that blood glucose levels reached clinically target ranges post-intervention. Baseline HbA1c influenced FBG trajectories, while baseline HbA1c and medication adherence influenced 2 h-PG trajectories. Age, gender, education, and disease duration showed no significant association with trajectories.

Conclusions: The CAPDCA model can effectively improve the control of HbA1c. The analysis of influencing factors of different trajectories suggested that the model was suitable for patients with different ages, genders, education levels, and disease duration. Further studies would be needed in exploring the application to various diseases and integrating the CAPDCA model with technologies such as artificial intelligence.

接受个性化患者教育的CAPDCA模型的糖尿病患者血糖轨迹:一项聚类随机对照试验。
目的:CAPDCA(收集、评估、计划、实施、检查、强化)模型是一种结构化、个性化的健康教育框架,旨在进行动态调整和持续改进。本研究评价其在糖尿病治疗中的疗效。方法:在6个社区卫生中心进行了一项随机对照试验,涉及178例2型糖尿病患者。干预组(n = 90)接受CAPDCA模式教育,对照组(n = 88)接受传统教育。干预持续了18个月,在基线和研究结束时收集HbA1c。每次随访时采集血糖。分析采用基于组的轨迹模型(GBTM)。结果:干预组与对照组比较,HbA1c降低(t = 6.356, p)。结论:CAPDCA模型可有效改善HbA1c的控制。对不同轨迹的影响因素分析表明,该模型适用于不同年龄、性别、文化程度和病程的患者。将CAPDCA模型与人工智能等技术相结合,探索其在各种疾病中的应用,有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信