How does scientific research influence policymaking? A study of four types of citation pathways between research articles and AI policy documents

IF 4.3 2区 管理学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Zhe Cao, Lin Zhang, Ying Huang, Gunnar Sivertsen
{"title":"How does scientific research influence policymaking? A study of four types of citation pathways between research articles and AI policy documents","authors":"Zhe Cao,&nbsp;Lin Zhang,&nbsp;Ying Huang,&nbsp;Gunnar Sivertsen","doi":"10.1002/asi.25006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The importance of evidence-based policymaking is widely recognized, but how science influences policy remains insufficiently explored. This study aims to examine how policy documents cite research articles, thereby tracing the complex impact process of scientific research on policymaking. A conceptual model is proposed to classify four types of citation pathways by distinguishing between direct and indirect impacts and observing whether a reinforcement effect is present. To operationalize this model, we collected nearly 10 thousand policy documents related to artificial intelligence (AI) and over 1.6 million links between these policies and their referenced articles. A large-scale data analysis and a case study were conducted. Results exhibit distinct citation pathways among specific types of institutions, geopolitical areas, and policy areas. Indirect influences emerge as an important mechanism. Research articles from EU countries primarily serve the policymaking of inter-governmental organizations (IGOs) and the EU, while research articles from the USA significantly support both domestic and foreign policymaking. Notably, IGOs serve as key intermediaries, facilitating the indirect influence of research on policymaking. In addition, while the knowledge from the social sciences provides substantial support for policies in various areas, an increasing involvement of the natural sciences in the development of AI-related policies is found.</p>","PeriodicalId":48810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","volume":"76 10","pages":"1340-1356"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.25006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The importance of evidence-based policymaking is widely recognized, but how science influences policy remains insufficiently explored. This study aims to examine how policy documents cite research articles, thereby tracing the complex impact process of scientific research on policymaking. A conceptual model is proposed to classify four types of citation pathways by distinguishing between direct and indirect impacts and observing whether a reinforcement effect is present. To operationalize this model, we collected nearly 10 thousand policy documents related to artificial intelligence (AI) and over 1.6 million links between these policies and their referenced articles. A large-scale data analysis and a case study were conducted. Results exhibit distinct citation pathways among specific types of institutions, geopolitical areas, and policy areas. Indirect influences emerge as an important mechanism. Research articles from EU countries primarily serve the policymaking of inter-governmental organizations (IGOs) and the EU, while research articles from the USA significantly support both domestic and foreign policymaking. Notably, IGOs serve as key intermediaries, facilitating the indirect influence of research on policymaking. In addition, while the knowledge from the social sciences provides substantial support for policies in various areas, an increasing involvement of the natural sciences in the development of AI-related policies is found.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

科学研究如何影响决策?研究论文与人工智能政策文件之间四种引用路径研究
以证据为基础的政策制定的重要性已得到广泛认可,但科学如何影响政策的探索仍不够充分。本研究旨在考察政策文件如何引用研究论文,从而追溯科学研究对政策制定的复杂影响过程。本文提出了一个概念模型,通过区分直接影响和间接影响以及观察是否存在强化效应来划分四种类型的引用途径。为了实现这一模型,我们收集了近1万份与人工智能(AI)相关的政策文件,以及这些政策与其参考文章之间的160多万个链接。进行了大规模的数据分析和案例研究。结果显示,在特定类型的机构、地缘政治区域和政策领域中,引用路径存在明显差异。间接影响是一种重要的机制。来自欧盟国家的研究文章主要服务于政府间组织(igo)和欧盟的政策制定,而来自美国的研究文章主要支持国内和国外的政策制定。值得注意的是,政府间组织是关键的中介机构,促进了研究对政策制定的间接影响。此外,虽然社会科学的知识为各个领域的政策提供了大量支持,但人们发现,自然科学越来越多地参与到人工智能相关政策的制定中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
8.60%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (JASIST) is a leading international forum for peer-reviewed research in information science. For more than half a century, JASIST has provided intellectual leadership by publishing original research that focuses on the production, discovery, recording, storage, representation, retrieval, presentation, manipulation, dissemination, use, and evaluation of information and on the tools and techniques associated with these processes. The Journal welcomes rigorous work of an empirical, experimental, ethnographic, conceptual, historical, socio-technical, policy-analytic, or critical-theoretical nature. JASIST also commissions in-depth review articles (“Advances in Information Science”) and reviews of print and other media.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信