Overcoming Scientific Cruelty: Bernard Rollin's Fight for Animal Rights

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Barry Kipperman
{"title":"Overcoming Scientific Cruelty: Bernard Rollin's Fight for Animal Rights","authors":"Barry Kipperman","doi":"10.1111/ajes.12637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This essay focuses on the contributions of Dr. Bernard Rollin to the ethical treatment of animals. Rollin was a visionary who questioned systemic societal treatment of animals and promoted a new social ethic for animals. This new ethic centered on ensuring that animals have a “life worth living”. Rollin taught the first class on veterinary ethics in the United States and considered the need to recognize and address animal pain as a moral imperative at a time when the subjective experience of animals was largely dismissed. Rollin did not believe that humans were inherently morally superior to non-human animals. Rollin proposed that all sentient animals should have rights that protect them from oppression of fundamental aspects of their nature for the good of society. Rollin fought for improved treatment of animals in laboratories and on farms, via both the court of public opinion as well as legislation. Rollin understood that animal welfare is an increasing concern for society and that society looks to veterinary medicine for answers. He urged the veterinary profession to lead on ethical and animal welfare issues. Rollin recognized that what many referred to as “animal problems” were often problems created by, and solved by, humans and that humans were often secondary victims of moral stress when work-related expectations or requirements discourage behaviors that could prevent animal suffering. Perhaps most importantly in our polarized socio-political environment, Rollin strongly believed that achieving ethical change occurs when we can find common ground with those we disagree with.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47133,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Economics and Sociology","volume":"84 4","pages":"613-619"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Economics and Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajes.12637","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay focuses on the contributions of Dr. Bernard Rollin to the ethical treatment of animals. Rollin was a visionary who questioned systemic societal treatment of animals and promoted a new social ethic for animals. This new ethic centered on ensuring that animals have a “life worth living”. Rollin taught the first class on veterinary ethics in the United States and considered the need to recognize and address animal pain as a moral imperative at a time when the subjective experience of animals was largely dismissed. Rollin did not believe that humans were inherently morally superior to non-human animals. Rollin proposed that all sentient animals should have rights that protect them from oppression of fundamental aspects of their nature for the good of society. Rollin fought for improved treatment of animals in laboratories and on farms, via both the court of public opinion as well as legislation. Rollin understood that animal welfare is an increasing concern for society and that society looks to veterinary medicine for answers. He urged the veterinary profession to lead on ethical and animal welfare issues. Rollin recognized that what many referred to as “animal problems” were often problems created by, and solved by, humans and that humans were often secondary victims of moral stress when work-related expectations or requirements discourage behaviors that could prevent animal suffering. Perhaps most importantly in our polarized socio-political environment, Rollin strongly believed that achieving ethical change occurs when we can find common ground with those we disagree with.

克服科学的残酷:伯纳德·罗林为动物权利而战
这篇文章的重点是伯纳德·罗林博士对动物伦理治疗的贡献。罗林是一个有远见的人,他质疑社会对动物的系统性对待,并提倡一种新的动物社会伦理。这种新伦理的核心是确保动物有“值得活下去的生命”。罗林教授了美国兽医伦理学的第一门课,他认为,在动物的主观体验在很大程度上被忽视的时候,认识和解决动物疼痛的必要性是一种道德要求。罗林不相信人类在道德上天生优于非人类动物。罗林提出,为了社会的利益,所有有知觉的动物都应该有权利保护它们不受天性基本方面的压迫。罗林通过舆论法庭和立法,为改善实验室和农场的动物待遇而斗争。罗林明白,动物福利是社会日益关注的问题,社会希望兽医能提供答案。他敦促兽医行业在道德和动物福利问题上发挥带头作用。罗林认识到,许多人所说的“动物问题”往往是由人类制造并解决的问题,当与工作有关的期望或要求阻碍了可以防止动物受苦的行为时,人类往往是道德压力的次要受害者。也许最重要的是,在我们两极分化的社会政治环境中,罗林坚信,当我们能够与我们不同意的人找到共同点时,就会实现道德变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Economics and Sociology (AJES) was founded in 1941, with support from the Robert Schalkenbach Foundation, to encourage the development of transdisciplinary solutions to social problems. In the introduction to the first issue, John Dewey observed that “the hostile state of the world and the intellectual division that has been built up in so-called ‘social science,’ are … reflections and expressions of the same fundamental causes.” Dewey commended this journal for its intention to promote “synthesis in the social field.” Dewey wrote those words almost six decades after the social science associations split off from the American Historical Association in pursuit of value-free knowledge derived from specialized disciplines. Since he wrote them, academic or disciplinary specialization has become even more pronounced. Multi-disciplinary work is superficially extolled in major universities, but practices and incentives still favor highly specialized work. The result is that academia has become a bastion of analytic excellence, breaking phenomena into components for intensive investigation, but it contributes little synthetic or holistic understanding that can aid society in finding solutions to contemporary problems. Analytic work remains important, but in response to the current lop-sided emphasis on specialization, the board of AJES has decided to return to its roots by emphasizing a more integrated and practical approach to knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信