Who funds whom exactly? A study of funding acknowledgments

IF 4.3 2区 管理学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Anna Panova, Nataliya Matveeva, Ivan Sterligov
{"title":"Who funds whom exactly? A study of funding acknowledgments","authors":"Anna Panova,&nbsp;Nataliya Matveeva,&nbsp;Ivan Sterligov","doi":"10.1002/asi.25004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Research funding plays a crucial role in the production of knowledge, and its nature varies considerably from country to country. Numerous studies have analyzed research funding from a bibliometric perspective. However, the role of individual authors in attracting funding remains understudied, and it may be crucial for many actors. We propose a new approach that provides a more accurate picture and test it on post-Soviet countries with low scientific production. We analyze the funding sources of the most visible part of the natural sciences by focusing on the funding acknowledgments of their papers in Nature Index journals published in 2017–2021. Both the country of origin and types of sources are accounted for. Our approach reveals marked differences between traditionally used paper-level and proposed author-level funding links. The shares of funding sources measured in this way are very different, especially with regard to foreign sources and the role of specific countries. This is particularly important when studying international papers and the roles of the countries involved, even more so for the countries with lower research capacity. Utilizing a case-driven funding sources classification, we paint a rich picture of diverging post-Soviet funding landscapes, mostly driven by national grants and EU-wide programmes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","volume":"76 10","pages":"1292-1307"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.25004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research funding plays a crucial role in the production of knowledge, and its nature varies considerably from country to country. Numerous studies have analyzed research funding from a bibliometric perspective. However, the role of individual authors in attracting funding remains understudied, and it may be crucial for many actors. We propose a new approach that provides a more accurate picture and test it on post-Soviet countries with low scientific production. We analyze the funding sources of the most visible part of the natural sciences by focusing on the funding acknowledgments of their papers in Nature Index journals published in 2017–2021. Both the country of origin and types of sources are accounted for. Our approach reveals marked differences between traditionally used paper-level and proposed author-level funding links. The shares of funding sources measured in this way are very different, especially with regard to foreign sources and the role of specific countries. This is particularly important when studying international papers and the roles of the countries involved, even more so for the countries with lower research capacity. Utilizing a case-driven funding sources classification, we paint a rich picture of diverging post-Soviet funding landscapes, mostly driven by national grants and EU-wide programmes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

到底是谁资助了谁?关于资金致谢的研究
研究经费在知识生产中起着至关重要的作用,其性质因国而异。许多研究从文献计量学的角度分析了研究经费。然而,个别作者在吸引资金方面的作用仍未得到充分研究,而这对许多参与者来说可能是至关重要的。我们提出了一种新的方法,它提供了一个更准确的图景,并在科学产出较低的后苏联国家进行了测试。我们通过关注2017-2021年发表在自然指数期刊上的论文的资金确认来分析自然科学中最明显的部分的资金来源。原产国和来源类型都有说明。我们的方法揭示了传统上使用的论文级和建议的作者级资助链接之间的显著差异。以这种方式衡量的资金来源的份额差别很大,特别是在外国来源和具体国家的作用方面。在研究国际论文和相关国家的角色时,这一点尤其重要,对于研究能力较低的国家更是如此。利用案例驱动的资金来源分类,我们描绘了一幅丰富的后苏联资助格局的图景,主要是由国家拨款和欧盟范围内的项目驱动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
8.60%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (JASIST) is a leading international forum for peer-reviewed research in information science. For more than half a century, JASIST has provided intellectual leadership by publishing original research that focuses on the production, discovery, recording, storage, representation, retrieval, presentation, manipulation, dissemination, use, and evaluation of information and on the tools and techniques associated with these processes. The Journal welcomes rigorous work of an empirical, experimental, ethnographic, conceptual, historical, socio-technical, policy-analytic, or critical-theoretical nature. JASIST also commissions in-depth review articles (“Advances in Information Science”) and reviews of print and other media.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信