Comparison of parametric model order reduction methods to solve magneto-quasistatic and electro-quasistatic problems

IF 3.5 3区 工程技术 Q1 MATHEMATICS, APPLIED
Wei Chen, Thomas Henneron, Stéphane Clénet
{"title":"Comparison of parametric model order reduction methods to solve magneto-quasistatic and electro-quasistatic problems","authors":"Wei Chen,&nbsp;Thomas Henneron,&nbsp;Stéphane Clénet","doi":"10.1016/j.finel.2025.104444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this paper, we compare two parametric model order reduction methods, the multi-moment matching method and the interpolation of projection subspaces method for the magneto-quasistatic (MQS) and electro-quasistatic (EQS) problems derived from Maxwell’s equations and discretized with the Finite Element (FE) method. The two problems considered are both governed by the differential–algebraic equations. The material characteristic parameters as well as the geometry parameters have been considered. The applications are two realistic test cases: an EQS model of a transformer bushing under insulation defect uncertainty and a MQS model of a planar inductor with geometric and material variations. The result shows that both methods approximate well global quantities, such as the current or the voltage, as well as the local quantities like field distributions. The multi-moment matching method remains always faster in the online stage, since the reduced basis is not parameter dependent, requiring no reduced basis calculation. The multi-moment matching method requires an affine decomposition of the FE model, which is not easy to obtain when considering geometry parameters. A hybrid method is proposed and tested leading to more accurate results than the interpolation of projection subspaces method but much easier to implement than the multi-moment matching method.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56133,"journal":{"name":"Finite Elements in Analysis and Design","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 104444"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finite Elements in Analysis and Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168874X25001337","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we compare two parametric model order reduction methods, the multi-moment matching method and the interpolation of projection subspaces method for the magneto-quasistatic (MQS) and electro-quasistatic (EQS) problems derived from Maxwell’s equations and discretized with the Finite Element (FE) method. The two problems considered are both governed by the differential–algebraic equations. The material characteristic parameters as well as the geometry parameters have been considered. The applications are two realistic test cases: an EQS model of a transformer bushing under insulation defect uncertainty and a MQS model of a planar inductor with geometric and material variations. The result shows that both methods approximate well global quantities, such as the current or the voltage, as well as the local quantities like field distributions. The multi-moment matching method remains always faster in the online stage, since the reduced basis is not parameter dependent, requiring no reduced basis calculation. The multi-moment matching method requires an affine decomposition of the FE model, which is not easy to obtain when considering geometry parameters. A hybrid method is proposed and tested leading to more accurate results than the interpolation of projection subspaces method but much easier to implement than the multi-moment matching method.
参数模型降阶方法解决磁准静态和电准静态问题的比较
本文比较了两种参数模型降阶方法,即多矩匹配法和投影子空间插值法,用于求解由麦克斯韦方程组导出并用有限元法离散的磁准静态(MQS)和电准静态(EQS)问题。所考虑的两个问题都由微分代数方程控制。考虑了材料的特性参数和几何参数。应用了两个实际的测试案例:绝缘缺陷不确定情况下变压器套管的EQS模型和具有几何和材料变化的平面电感器的MQS模型。结果表明,这两种方法都能很好地逼近电流或电压等全局量以及场分布等局部量。多矩匹配方法在在线阶段总是更快,因为约简基不依赖于参数,不需要计算约简基。多矩匹配方法需要对有限元模型进行仿射分解,在考虑几何参数的情况下,这种方法不容易得到。提出并测试了一种混合方法,其结果比投影子空间插值法更精确,但比多矩匹配法更容易实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
92
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The aim of this journal is to provide ideas and information involving the use of the finite element method and its variants, both in scientific inquiry and in professional practice. The scope is intentionally broad, encompassing use of the finite element method in engineering as well as the pure and applied sciences. The emphasis of the journal will be the development and use of numerical procedures to solve practical problems, although contributions relating to the mathematical and theoretical foundations and computer implementation of numerical methods are likewise welcomed. Review articles presenting unbiased and comprehensive reviews of state-of-the-art topics will also be accommodated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信