New Zealanders’ attitudes to outdoor access for owned domestic cats

IF 2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Lauréline Guinnefollau , Hee Jin Chung , Carly Moody , Gosia Zobel , Natalie Waran , Renee Railton
{"title":"New Zealanders’ attitudes to outdoor access for owned domestic cats","authors":"Lauréline Guinnefollau ,&nbsp;Hee Jin Chung ,&nbsp;Carly Moody ,&nbsp;Gosia Zobel ,&nbsp;Natalie Waran ,&nbsp;Renee Railton","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates domestic cat management practices in New Zealand, focusing on attitudes toward free-roaming (e.g., unrestricted outdoor access) among cat owners and non-owners. Most owned cats in New Zealand have some form of outdoor access, a debated topic centered around wildlife conservation and cat safety. Understanding factors influencing owner views about free-roaming is crucial for policy development. We distributed an online questionnaire to New Zealand residents (n = 1846) assessing attitudes toward cat free-roaming, current management, and the factors that predict both. Cat owners (82.2 %) were more likely to indicate cats should be allowed to free-roam (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) and that free-roaming is necessary for cats to have a good life (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001), compared to non-cat owners. Younger respondents were more likely to favour restricting outdoor access compared to older age groups (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Urban respondents favoured restricting outdoor access compared to suburban or rural-based respondents (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Among cat owners, those providing vertical space and/or scratching areas were less likely to support free-roaming (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) compared to those not providing these items. Conversely, owners not providing litter boxes were more likely to support free-roaming (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Owners interacting more than once daily with their cat through play were less likely to believe that free-roaming was necessary and more likely to restrict outdoor access. These results identify specific owner characteristics and care practices associated with attitudes toward indoor and outdoor cat management; these insights can guide stakeholders developing cat welfare policies and educational programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8222,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","volume":"292 ","pages":"Article 106817"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159125003156","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates domestic cat management practices in New Zealand, focusing on attitudes toward free-roaming (e.g., unrestricted outdoor access) among cat owners and non-owners. Most owned cats in New Zealand have some form of outdoor access, a debated topic centered around wildlife conservation and cat safety. Understanding factors influencing owner views about free-roaming is crucial for policy development. We distributed an online questionnaire to New Zealand residents (n = 1846) assessing attitudes toward cat free-roaming, current management, and the factors that predict both. Cat owners (82.2 %) were more likely to indicate cats should be allowed to free-roam (P < 0.0001) and that free-roaming is necessary for cats to have a good life (P < 0.0001), compared to non-cat owners. Younger respondents were more likely to favour restricting outdoor access compared to older age groups (P < 0.05). Urban respondents favoured restricting outdoor access compared to suburban or rural-based respondents (P < 0.05). Among cat owners, those providing vertical space and/or scratching areas were less likely to support free-roaming (P < 0.05) compared to those not providing these items. Conversely, owners not providing litter boxes were more likely to support free-roaming (P < 0.05). Owners interacting more than once daily with their cat through play were less likely to believe that free-roaming was necessary and more likely to restrict outdoor access. These results identify specific owner characteristics and care practices associated with attitudes toward indoor and outdoor cat management; these insights can guide stakeholders developing cat welfare policies and educational programs.
新西兰人对养猫到户外活动的态度
本研究调查了新西兰的家猫管理实践,重点关注猫主人和非猫主人对自由漫游(例如,不受限制的户外活动)的态度。在新西兰,大多数人养的猫都有某种形式的户外活动,这是一个围绕野生动物保护和猫安全的争议话题。了解影响所有者对自由漫游的看法的因素对于制定政策至关重要。我们向新西兰居民发放了一份在线问卷(n = 1846),评估他们对猫的自由漫游、目前的管理以及预测两者的因素的态度。与不养猫的人相比,养猫的人(82.2 %)更有可能表示应该允许猫自由漫游(P <; 0.0001),并且自由漫游对猫的美好生活是必要的(P <; 0.0001)。与年龄较大的人群相比,年轻的受访者更倾向于限制户外活动(P <; 0.05)。与郊区或农村的受访者相比,城市受访者倾向于限制户外活动(P <; 0.05)。在猫主人中,那些提供垂直空间和/或抓痒区域的人比那些不提供这些物品的人更不可能支持自由漫游(P <; 0.05)。相反,不提供猫砂盆的主人更有可能支持自由漫游(P <; 0.05)。每天与猫玩耍超过一次的主人不太可能认为自由漫游是必要的,更有可能限制猫到户外活动。这些结果确定了与室内和室外猫管理态度相关的特定主人特征和护理实践;这些见解可以指导利益相关者制定猫福利政策和教育计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Applied Animal Behaviour Science 农林科学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
21.70%
发文量
191
审稿时长
18.1 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes relevant information on the behaviour of domesticated and utilized animals. Topics covered include: -Behaviour of farm, zoo and laboratory animals in relation to animal management and welfare -Behaviour of companion animals in relation to behavioural problems, for example, in relation to the training of dogs for different purposes, in relation to behavioural problems -Studies of the behaviour of wild animals when these studies are relevant from an applied perspective, for example in relation to wildlife management, pest management or nature conservation -Methodological studies within relevant fields The principal subjects are farm, companion and laboratory animals, including, of course, poultry. The journal also deals with the following animal subjects: -Those involved in any farming system, e.g. deer, rabbits and fur-bearing animals -Those in ANY form of confinement, e.g. zoos, safari parks and other forms of display -Feral animals, and any animal species which impinge on farming operations, e.g. as causes of loss or damage -Species used for hunting, recreation etc. may also be considered as acceptable subjects in some instances -Laboratory animals, if the material relates to their behavioural requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信