HOW AUTONOMOUS BUS TRIALS AFFECT PASSENGERS’ VIEWS: EXPLORING THE GAP BETWEEN PRE-RIDE EXPECTATIONS AND REAL WORD EXPERIENCE

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Achille Fonzone , Grigorios Fountas , Lucy Downey , Adebola Olowosegun
{"title":"HOW AUTONOMOUS BUS TRIALS AFFECT PASSENGERS’ VIEWS: EXPLORING THE GAP BETWEEN PRE-RIDE EXPECTATIONS AND REAL WORD EXPERIENCE","authors":"Achille Fonzone ,&nbsp;Grigorios Fountas ,&nbsp;Lucy Downey ,&nbsp;Adebola Olowosegun","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.07.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study investigates passengers’ perceptions of a real-world trial involving a level 4 full-sized Automated Bus (AB) operating as a commercial service on a 22 km inter-urban route along public roads in East Scotland. By focusing on a trial, where the AB navigates mixed traffic, different road types (including motorways) and operates at speeds of up to 80 km/h, this research fills a significant gap in the existing literature, which has offered limited exploration of passenger AB experiences in such complex and realistic operational environments. The contribution of this study lies in providing a comprehensive analysis of passenger expectations and satisfaction, considering both the automated driving technology and the service in all its aspects, while also taking into account their interactions. Results (n = 490) revealed generally positive views from passengers with 61.7 % indicating that the AB technology exceeded their expectations and 71.1 % expressing a high likelihood of recommending the service to others. A binary probit model with random parameters showed satisfaction with ride smoothness and vehicle noise, low pre-ride expectations, and a willingness to use unstaffed ABs were key determinants of post-trial evaluation. In addition, frequency of bus use and gender were found to have mixed effects. A second binary probit model found that high pre-trial expectations, infrequent car use, and frequent bus use influenced the net promoter score, with satisfaction with AB driving style and with service characteristics having heterogeneous effects. These findings offer valuable insights for the transport industry, guiding their future developments and strategies for the successful implementation of AB technology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 103311"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825002591","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study investigates passengers’ perceptions of a real-world trial involving a level 4 full-sized Automated Bus (AB) operating as a commercial service on a 22 km inter-urban route along public roads in East Scotland. By focusing on a trial, where the AB navigates mixed traffic, different road types (including motorways) and operates at speeds of up to 80 km/h, this research fills a significant gap in the existing literature, which has offered limited exploration of passenger AB experiences in such complex and realistic operational environments. The contribution of this study lies in providing a comprehensive analysis of passenger expectations and satisfaction, considering both the automated driving technology and the service in all its aspects, while also taking into account their interactions. Results (n = 490) revealed generally positive views from passengers with 61.7 % indicating that the AB technology exceeded their expectations and 71.1 % expressing a high likelihood of recommending the service to others. A binary probit model with random parameters showed satisfaction with ride smoothness and vehicle noise, low pre-ride expectations, and a willingness to use unstaffed ABs were key determinants of post-trial evaluation. In addition, frequency of bus use and gender were found to have mixed effects. A second binary probit model found that high pre-trial expectations, infrequent car use, and frequent bus use influenced the net promoter score, with satisfaction with AB driving style and with service characteristics having heterogeneous effects. These findings offer valuable insights for the transport industry, guiding their future developments and strategies for the successful implementation of AB technology.
自动驾驶巴士试验如何影响乘客的观点:探索乘车前预期与实际体验之间的差距
该研究调查了乘客对现实世界试验的看法,该试验涉及在东苏格兰公共道路沿线22公里的城市间路线上运行4级全尺寸自动巴士(AB)作为商业服务。通过专注于一项试验,其中AB导航混合交通,不同的道路类型(包括高速公路),并以高达80公里/小时的速度运行,本研究填补了现有文献中的重大空白,这些文献在如此复杂和现实的操作环境中对乘客AB体验的探索有限。本研究的贡献在于全面分析了乘客的期望和满意度,考虑了自动驾驶技术和服务的各个方面,同时也考虑了它们之间的相互作用。结果(n = 490)显示乘客普遍持积极态度,61.7%的人表示AB技术超出了他们的预期,71.1%的人表示很有可能向他人推荐这项服务。随机参数的二元概率模型显示,驾驶平顺性和车辆噪音满意度、驾驶前低期望以及使用无人ABs的意愿是试验后评估的关键决定因素。此外,乘坐公交车的频率和性别也有不同的影响。第二个二元概率模型发现,高预审期望、不频繁使用汽车和频繁使用公共汽车影响净推荐值,对AB驾驶风格和服务特征的满意度具有异质性影响。这些发现为运输行业提供了有价值的见解,指导他们未来的发展和成功实施自动驾驶技术的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信