Cynthia B. Pestana , Daniela Morais Leme , Enzo Zini Moreira Silva , Sahra Kiessig , James W. Firman , Carsten Kneuer , Philip Marx-Stoelting , Mark T.D. Cronin
{"title":"Challenges and opportunities of read-across for the tumor promotion effects of microcystins","authors":"Cynthia B. Pestana , Daniela Morais Leme , Enzo Zini Moreira Silva , Sahra Kiessig , James W. Firman , Carsten Kneuer , Philip Marx-Stoelting , Mark T.D. Cronin","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The microcystins (MCs) are a family of cyclic oligopeptides toxins expressed in at least 30 cyanobacterial species and are liable to pose significant hazard to human health due to hepatotoxicity. Microcystin-leucine arginine (MC-LR) is the most extensively studied and toxic congener and classified as possibly carcinogenic to humans based on tumor promotion activity in the liver. Given the substantial toxicity data gaps for the MCs, read-across was assessed to evaluate the tumor promotion effects of a series of data-poor MC congeners based on <em>in vivo</em> information for MC-LR as the source molecule. Lines of evidence from <em>in silico</em> estimates of structural similarity, physico-chemical properties, hepatotoxicity, genotoxic and carcinogenicity were compiled to support the filling of data gaps. Uncertainties were evaluated according to scenario 4 of the European Chemicals Agency's (ECHA's) Read-Across Assessment Framework (RAAF). The read-across process followed a previously proposed harmonized framework to apply the common principles together with information from new approach methodologies (NAMs). Lines of evidence were consistent across the MC congeners and the uncertainties were found to be acceptable for data gap filling. Read-across strategies, with known caveats and restrictions, were shown to be applicable for large, complex molecules such as the MCs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 105938"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025001709","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The microcystins (MCs) are a family of cyclic oligopeptides toxins expressed in at least 30 cyanobacterial species and are liable to pose significant hazard to human health due to hepatotoxicity. Microcystin-leucine arginine (MC-LR) is the most extensively studied and toxic congener and classified as possibly carcinogenic to humans based on tumor promotion activity in the liver. Given the substantial toxicity data gaps for the MCs, read-across was assessed to evaluate the tumor promotion effects of a series of data-poor MC congeners based on in vivo information for MC-LR as the source molecule. Lines of evidence from in silico estimates of structural similarity, physico-chemical properties, hepatotoxicity, genotoxic and carcinogenicity were compiled to support the filling of data gaps. Uncertainties were evaluated according to scenario 4 of the European Chemicals Agency's (ECHA's) Read-Across Assessment Framework (RAAF). The read-across process followed a previously proposed harmonized framework to apply the common principles together with information from new approach methodologies (NAMs). Lines of evidence were consistent across the MC congeners and the uncertainties were found to be acceptable for data gap filling. Read-across strategies, with known caveats and restrictions, were shown to be applicable for large, complex molecules such as the MCs.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)