Diagnostic Features of Infective Native Aortic Aneurysms:a Case-Control Study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Zhengkunx Huo, Xuejun Wu
{"title":"Diagnostic Features of Infective Native Aortic Aneurysms:a Case-Control Study.","authors":"Zhengkunx Huo, Xuejun Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.08.048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infective native aortic aneurysm (INAA) is a highly lethal disease that poses great challenges for the diagnosis. The Delphi consensus is the first consensus document and offered the diagnostic criteria of INAA. The previous research mainly compared INAA with published data. This case-control study aimed to compare clinical characteristics of INAA and non-infective aortic aneurysms (NIAA) to provide external verification of the diagnostic algorithm of INAA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>INAA patients between 2013 and 2022 were extracted and were further reviewed with the criteria of the consensus. NIAA patients were assigned to the randomly selected (RS) group at a ratio of 2:1 and the propensity score-matched (PSM) group at a ratio of 1:1. A case-control study was performed. A nomogram diagnostic model was constructed with the result of logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>87 cases were identified as INAA (6.6%). Mean age of INAA was 67.1 years (SD 9.8), younger than those with NIAA (P=.009). There was no significant difference in multiple aneurysms between INAA and NIAA (P=.12). Mural thrombus (n=45 versus 148) and calcification (n=36 versus 148) were negatively correlated with INAA. The sensitivity of the diagnostic algorithm was 98.9%, and the specificity was 75.9%. The area under curve of the diagnostic model was 0.97 and the concordance index was 0.97.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The diagnostic criteria in the Delphi consensus had a high sensitivity, while its specificity was not ideal. Whether multiple aneurysms can support the diagnosis of INAA remains to be further discussed. Mural thrombus and calcification can be the negative predictive factors of INAA. A new diagnostic model was proposed, and the nomogram model can identify INAA with high accuracy and discriminative ability.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2025.08.048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infective native aortic aneurysm (INAA) is a highly lethal disease that poses great challenges for the diagnosis. The Delphi consensus is the first consensus document and offered the diagnostic criteria of INAA. The previous research mainly compared INAA with published data. This case-control study aimed to compare clinical characteristics of INAA and non-infective aortic aneurysms (NIAA) to provide external verification of the diagnostic algorithm of INAA.

Methods: INAA patients between 2013 and 2022 were extracted and were further reviewed with the criteria of the consensus. NIAA patients were assigned to the randomly selected (RS) group at a ratio of 2:1 and the propensity score-matched (PSM) group at a ratio of 1:1. A case-control study was performed. A nomogram diagnostic model was constructed with the result of logistic regression.

Results: 87 cases were identified as INAA (6.6%). Mean age of INAA was 67.1 years (SD 9.8), younger than those with NIAA (P=.009). There was no significant difference in multiple aneurysms between INAA and NIAA (P=.12). Mural thrombus (n=45 versus 148) and calcification (n=36 versus 148) were negatively correlated with INAA. The sensitivity of the diagnostic algorithm was 98.9%, and the specificity was 75.9%. The area under curve of the diagnostic model was 0.97 and the concordance index was 0.97.

Conclusion: The diagnostic criteria in the Delphi consensus had a high sensitivity, while its specificity was not ideal. Whether multiple aneurysms can support the diagnosis of INAA remains to be further discussed. Mural thrombus and calcification can be the negative predictive factors of INAA. A new diagnostic model was proposed, and the nomogram model can identify INAA with high accuracy and discriminative ability.

感染性原生主动脉瘤的诊断特征:一项病例对照研究。
背景:感染性原生主动脉瘤(INAA)是一种高致死率的疾病,对其诊断提出了很大的挑战。德尔菲共识是第一个共识文件,提供了诊断标准。之前的研究主要是将INAA与已发表的数据进行比较。本病例对照研究旨在比较INAA与非感染性主动脉瘤(NIAA)的临床特征,为INAA的诊断算法提供外部验证。方法:选取2013 ~ 2022年的INAA患者,按照共识标准进行回顾性分析。NIAA患者按2:1的比例分为随机选择组(RS),按1:1的比例分为倾向评分匹配组(PSM)。进行了病例对照研究。利用logistic回归的结果建立了nomogram诊断模型。结果:确诊INAA 87例(6.6%)。INAA患者的平均年龄为67.1岁(SD 9.8),明显低于NIAA患者(P= 0.009)。INAA组与NIAA组多发性动脉瘤发生率无显著性差异(P= 0.12)。壁栓(n=45 vs 148)和钙化(n=36 vs 148)与INAA呈负相关。诊断算法的敏感性为98.9%,特异性为75.9%。诊断模型的曲线下面积为0.97,一致性指数为0.97。结论:德尔菲共识诊断标准敏感性高,特异性不理想。多动脉瘤是否能支持INAA的诊断还有待进一步探讨。壁栓和钙化可能是INAA的负面预测因素。提出了一种新的诊断模型,该模型具有较高的准确率和判别能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信