Accounting for Culture in Evaluations of Climate‐Induced Noneconomic Losses and Damages: Case Studies With Three Indigenous Communities From Rural Fiji

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
RURAL SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-11 DOI:10.1111/ruso.70023
Lila Singh‐Peterson, Manoa Iranacolaivalu, Mereia Fong Lomavatu
{"title":"Accounting for Culture in Evaluations of Climate‐Induced Noneconomic Losses and Damages: Case Studies With Three Indigenous Communities From Rural Fiji","authors":"Lila Singh‐Peterson, Manoa Iranacolaivalu, Mereia Fong Lomavatu","doi":"10.1111/ruso.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many Indigenous societies have effective resilience strategies that have served them well for centuries. These strategies have enabled generations of people to cope with, adapt, and overcome diverse forms of adversity. For many semi‐subsistence‐based societies, climate change poses a different threat; one that has rendered some traditional adaptation pathways partially ineffective as natural resources have become less abundant and natural systems more unpredictable. This study presents narratives compiled through ethnography and qualitative research with three rural Indigenous <jats:italic>iTaukei</jats:italic> communities located on two islands in Fiji. Attributed in part to the prevalence of cultural values centered on relationalism, these communities have retained very effective systems of social resilience; however, losses sustained from almost annual cyclone events and associated landslides and earthquakes are taking their toll on the communities' capacities to recover and re‐establish valued dimensions of social life. This study responds to calls for empirical evidence of the forms and significance of noneconomic loss and damage (NELD) by drawing out gender‐sensitive, relational aspects of loss and damage observed in villagers' narratives.","PeriodicalId":47924,"journal":{"name":"RURAL SOCIOLOGY","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RURAL SOCIOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.70023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many Indigenous societies have effective resilience strategies that have served them well for centuries. These strategies have enabled generations of people to cope with, adapt, and overcome diverse forms of adversity. For many semi‐subsistence‐based societies, climate change poses a different threat; one that has rendered some traditional adaptation pathways partially ineffective as natural resources have become less abundant and natural systems more unpredictable. This study presents narratives compiled through ethnography and qualitative research with three rural Indigenous iTaukei communities located on two islands in Fiji. Attributed in part to the prevalence of cultural values centered on relationalism, these communities have retained very effective systems of social resilience; however, losses sustained from almost annual cyclone events and associated landslides and earthquakes are taking their toll on the communities' capacities to recover and re‐establish valued dimensions of social life. This study responds to calls for empirical evidence of the forms and significance of noneconomic loss and damage (NELD) by drawing out gender‐sensitive, relational aspects of loss and damage observed in villagers' narratives.
气候引起的非经济损失和损害评估中的文化核算:斐济农村三个土著社区的案例研究
许多土著社会都有有效的复原力战略,几个世纪以来一直很有效。这些策略使几代人能够应付、适应和克服各种形式的逆境。对于许多半维持生计的社会来说,气候变化构成了不同的威胁;随着自然资源变得不那么丰富,自然系统变得更加不可预测,一些传统的适应途径已经部分失效。本研究介绍了通过民族志和定性研究对斐济两个岛屿上的三个农村土著iTaukei社区进行的叙述。部分归因于以关系主义为中心的文化价值观的盛行,这些社区保留了非常有效的社会弹性系统;然而,几乎每年一次的飓风事件以及相关的山体滑坡和地震造成的损失正在损害社区恢复和重建社会生活的重要方面的能力。本研究回应了对非经济损失和损害(NELD)形式和意义的经验证据的呼吁,通过提取在村民叙述中观察到的损失和损害的性别敏感、关系方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
RURAL SOCIOLOGY
RURAL SOCIOLOGY SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: A forum for cutting-edge research, Rural Sociology explores sociological and interdisciplinary approaches to emerging social issues and new approaches to recurring social issues affecting rural people and places. The journal is particularly interested in advancing sociological theory and welcomes the use of a wide range of social science methodologies. Manuscripts that use a sociological perspective to address the effects of local and global systems on rural people and places, rural community revitalization, rural demographic changes, rural poverty, natural resource allocations, the environment, food and agricultural systems, and related topics from all regions of the world are welcome. Rural Sociology also accepts papers that significantly advance the measurement of key sociological concepts or provide well-documented critical analysis of one or more theories as these measures and analyses are related to rural sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信