Accounting for Culture in Evaluations of Climate‐Induced Noneconomic Losses and Damages: Case Studies With Three Indigenous Communities From Rural Fiji
{"title":"Accounting for Culture in Evaluations of Climate‐Induced Noneconomic Losses and Damages: Case Studies With Three Indigenous Communities From Rural Fiji","authors":"Lila Singh‐Peterson, Manoa Iranacolaivalu, Mereia Fong Lomavatu","doi":"10.1111/ruso.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many Indigenous societies have effective resilience strategies that have served them well for centuries. These strategies have enabled generations of people to cope with, adapt, and overcome diverse forms of adversity. For many semi‐subsistence‐based societies, climate change poses a different threat; one that has rendered some traditional adaptation pathways partially ineffective as natural resources have become less abundant and natural systems more unpredictable. This study presents narratives compiled through ethnography and qualitative research with three rural Indigenous <jats:italic>iTaukei</jats:italic> communities located on two islands in Fiji. Attributed in part to the prevalence of cultural values centered on relationalism, these communities have retained very effective systems of social resilience; however, losses sustained from almost annual cyclone events and associated landslides and earthquakes are taking their toll on the communities' capacities to recover and re‐establish valued dimensions of social life. This study responds to calls for empirical evidence of the forms and significance of noneconomic loss and damage (NELD) by drawing out gender‐sensitive, relational aspects of loss and damage observed in villagers' narratives.","PeriodicalId":47924,"journal":{"name":"RURAL SOCIOLOGY","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RURAL SOCIOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.70023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Many Indigenous societies have effective resilience strategies that have served them well for centuries. These strategies have enabled generations of people to cope with, adapt, and overcome diverse forms of adversity. For many semi‐subsistence‐based societies, climate change poses a different threat; one that has rendered some traditional adaptation pathways partially ineffective as natural resources have become less abundant and natural systems more unpredictable. This study presents narratives compiled through ethnography and qualitative research with three rural Indigenous iTaukei communities located on two islands in Fiji. Attributed in part to the prevalence of cultural values centered on relationalism, these communities have retained very effective systems of social resilience; however, losses sustained from almost annual cyclone events and associated landslides and earthquakes are taking their toll on the communities' capacities to recover and re‐establish valued dimensions of social life. This study responds to calls for empirical evidence of the forms and significance of noneconomic loss and damage (NELD) by drawing out gender‐sensitive, relational aspects of loss and damage observed in villagers' narratives.
期刊介绍:
A forum for cutting-edge research, Rural Sociology explores sociological and interdisciplinary approaches to emerging social issues and new approaches to recurring social issues affecting rural people and places. The journal is particularly interested in advancing sociological theory and welcomes the use of a wide range of social science methodologies. Manuscripts that use a sociological perspective to address the effects of local and global systems on rural people and places, rural community revitalization, rural demographic changes, rural poverty, natural resource allocations, the environment, food and agricultural systems, and related topics from all regions of the world are welcome. Rural Sociology also accepts papers that significantly advance the measurement of key sociological concepts or provide well-documented critical analysis of one or more theories as these measures and analyses are related to rural sociology.