Patient and physician perceptions of a hypercholesterolemia safety-net program.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Teresa N Harrison, Matt Zhou, Hui Zhou, Hananeh Derakhshan, Mona Zia, Michael H Kanter, Ronald D Scott, Tracy M Imley, Mark A Sanders, Royann Timmins, Kristi Reynolds, Matthew T Mefford
{"title":"Patient and physician perceptions of a hypercholesterolemia safety-net program.","authors":"Teresa N Harrison, Matt Zhou, Hui Zhou, Hananeh Derakhshan, Mona Zia, Michael H Kanter, Ronald D Scott, Tracy M Imley, Mark A Sanders, Royann Timmins, Kristi Reynolds, Matthew T Mefford","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2025.89794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To understand the perceptions of patients and primary care physicians as well as barriers to and facilitators of engaging with a safety-net program for patients with hypercholesterolemia.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional telephone survey of patients and qualitative interviews with PCPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients' reasons for adherence or nonadherence to statins and completion of laboratory tests and their perceptions of the safety-net program were ascertained. PCPs were asked to describe their familiarity with the safety-net program and perceived patient barriers to filling a new statin prescription and completing laboratory tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 59 participating patients, 86% did and 14% did not fill their statin. Patients reported statin adherence because their doctor prescribed it (100%), to lower cholesterol (94%), and to prevent a heart attack/stroke (51%). Reasons for nonadherence included wanting to try lifestyle modification (63%), general medication concerns (50%), and fear of adverse events (38%). Among patients filling their prescription, 94% completed a follow-up lipid panel. Among 14 PCPs interviewed, 8 were aware of the safety-net program. PCPs cited in-basket volume and lack of an automated reminder system as common barriers to following up with patients with high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. PCPs perceived (1) patients' fear of statins and (2) forgetfulness as the main reasons for not filling their prescriptions and not completing lipid panels, respectively. PCPs suggested that more frequent patient and provider reminders could improve prescription fills and laboratory test completions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interventions focused on improving patients' knowledge of statins and educating PCPs about outreach programs may facilitate patient-provider communication and improve statin adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"31 Spec. No. 10","pages":"SP680-SP690"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2025.89794","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To understand the perceptions of patients and primary care physicians as well as barriers to and facilitators of engaging with a safety-net program for patients with hypercholesterolemia.

Study design: A cross-sectional telephone survey of patients and qualitative interviews with PCPs.

Methods: Patients' reasons for adherence or nonadherence to statins and completion of laboratory tests and their perceptions of the safety-net program were ascertained. PCPs were asked to describe their familiarity with the safety-net program and perceived patient barriers to filling a new statin prescription and completing laboratory tests.

Results: Among 59 participating patients, 86% did and 14% did not fill their statin. Patients reported statin adherence because their doctor prescribed it (100%), to lower cholesterol (94%), and to prevent a heart attack/stroke (51%). Reasons for nonadherence included wanting to try lifestyle modification (63%), general medication concerns (50%), and fear of adverse events (38%). Among patients filling their prescription, 94% completed a follow-up lipid panel. Among 14 PCPs interviewed, 8 were aware of the safety-net program. PCPs cited in-basket volume and lack of an automated reminder system as common barriers to following up with patients with high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. PCPs perceived (1) patients' fear of statins and (2) forgetfulness as the main reasons for not filling their prescriptions and not completing lipid panels, respectively. PCPs suggested that more frequent patient and provider reminders could improve prescription fills and laboratory test completions.

Conclusions: Interventions focused on improving patients' knowledge of statins and educating PCPs about outreach programs may facilitate patient-provider communication and improve statin adherence.

病人和医生对高胆固醇血症安全网计划的看法。
目的:了解患者和初级保健医生的看法,以及参与高胆固醇血症患者安全网计划的障碍和促进因素。研究设计:对患者进行横断面电话调查,并对pcp进行定性访谈。方法:确定患者坚持或不坚持他汀类药物的原因,完成实验室检查,以及他们对安全网计划的看法。pcp被要求描述他们对安全网计划的熟悉程度,以及患者在填写新的他汀类药物处方和完成实验室检查方面的障碍。结果:59例患者中,86%的患者服用了他汀类药物,14%的患者没有服用他汀类药物。患者报告他汀类药物依从性是因为他们的医生开了它(100%),降低胆固醇(94%)和预防心脏病发作/中风(51%)。不坚持治疗的原因包括想要尝试改变生活方式(63%)、一般药物问题(50%)和害怕不良事件(38%)。在按处方服药的患者中,94%的人完成了后续的血脂检查。在接受采访的14家pcp中,有8家了解安全网计划。pcp认为,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平高的患者随访的常见障碍是病历篮容量和缺乏自动提醒系统。pcp分别认为(1)患者对他汀类药物的恐惧和(2)健忘是不配药和不完成脂质检查的主要原因。pcp建议,更频繁地提醒患者和提供者可以改善处方填充和实验室测试完成情况。结论:干预措施侧重于提高患者对他汀类药物的认识,并对pcp进行外展计划的教育,可以促进患者与提供者的沟通,提高他汀类药物的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信