Turkish Reliability and Validity of the Intensive Care Unit Specific Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale (RAPS-ICU): A Tool Validation.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Sabahat Göncü, Emine Kir Bicer
{"title":"Turkish Reliability and Validity of the Intensive Care Unit Specific Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale (RAPS-ICU): A Tool Validation.","authors":"Sabahat Göncü, Emine Kir Bicer","doi":"10.1111/nicc.70176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pressure injuries are a major concern in intensive care units (ICUs), as critically ill patients are at high risk due to immobility and compromised health conditions. Accurate and reliable risk assessment tools, such as the Risk Assessment Pressure Injury Scale for the Intensive Care Unit (RAPS-ICU), are essential for early detection and prevention of pressure injuries in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to determine the Turkish validity and reliability of the RAPS-ICU.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a tool validation study conducted with 62 patients hospitalised in the ICU of a Training and Research Hospital in Turkey. The RAPS-ICU was translated into Turkish, and its construct validity was evaluated using the content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (CVI). Further validation involved exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA, CFA). Reliability was assessed through internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, item-total correlation, and test-retest reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value for the scale was 0.804, indicating sample adequacy. All item discrimination values were above 0.20, with factor loadings between 0.35 and 0.90. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.825. Standard factor loadings ranged from 0.23 to 0.93, with root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.086, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.98, normed fit index (NFI) = 0.94, goodness-of-fit index (GFI) = 0.93, and standardised root mean square residual (SRMR) = 0.061. The CVI was 0.88, and the CVR exceeded the criterion value. The test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.933, and inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.78 to 0.87.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Turkish version of the RAPS-ICU demonstrated established validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>The validated Turkish version of the RAPS-ICU provides a reliable and accurate tool for assessing pressure injury risk in intensive care settings. Its high reliability and validity support its use in clinical practice to enhance early detection and prevention strategies, ultimately improving patient outcomes. By integrating the RAPS-ICU into routine assessments, intensive care nurses can make more informed decisions regarding pressure injury prevention, optimising nursing care planning and patient safety in Turkish ICUs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":"30 5","pages":"e70176"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70176","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pressure injuries are a major concern in intensive care units (ICUs), as critically ill patients are at high risk due to immobility and compromised health conditions. Accurate and reliable risk assessment tools, such as the Risk Assessment Pressure Injury Scale for the Intensive Care Unit (RAPS-ICU), are essential for early detection and prevention of pressure injuries in clinical practice.

Aim: This study aimed to determine the Turkish validity and reliability of the RAPS-ICU.

Study design: This was a tool validation study conducted with 62 patients hospitalised in the ICU of a Training and Research Hospital in Turkey. The RAPS-ICU was translated into Turkish, and its construct validity was evaluated using the content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (CVI). Further validation involved exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA, CFA). Reliability was assessed through internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, item-total correlation, and test-retest reliability.

Results: The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value for the scale was 0.804, indicating sample adequacy. All item discrimination values were above 0.20, with factor loadings between 0.35 and 0.90. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.825. Standard factor loadings ranged from 0.23 to 0.93, with root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.086, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.98, normed fit index (NFI) = 0.94, goodness-of-fit index (GFI) = 0.93, and standardised root mean square residual (SRMR) = 0.061. The CVI was 0.88, and the CVR exceeded the criterion value. The test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.933, and inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.78 to 0.87.

Conclusions: The Turkish version of the RAPS-ICU demonstrated established validity and reliability.

Relevance to clinical practice: The validated Turkish version of the RAPS-ICU provides a reliable and accurate tool for assessing pressure injury risk in intensive care settings. Its high reliability and validity support its use in clinical practice to enhance early detection and prevention strategies, ultimately improving patient outcomes. By integrating the RAPS-ICU into routine assessments, intensive care nurses can make more informed decisions regarding pressure injury prevention, optimising nursing care planning and patient safety in Turkish ICUs.

土耳其重症监护病房特定压力损伤风险评估量表(RAPS-ICU)的信度和效度:工具验证。
背景:压力损伤是重症监护病房(icu)的一个主要问题,因为危重患者由于行动不便和健康状况受损而处于高风险中。准确可靠的风险评估工具,如重症监护病房压力损伤风险评估量表(RAPS-ICU),对于临床实践中早期发现和预防压力损伤至关重要。目的:本研究旨在确定RAPS-ICU在土耳其的效度和信度。研究设计:这是一项工具验证研究,对土耳其一家培训和研究医院ICU住院的62例患者进行了研究。将RAPS-ICU翻译成土耳其文,采用内容效度比(CVR)和内容效度指数(CVI)评价其结构效度。进一步的验证包括探索性和验证性因素分析(EFA, CFA)。信度通过内部一致性、量表间信度、项目-总相关和测试-重测信度来评估。结果:量表的KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin)值为0.804,表明样本充足。各项目判别值均在0.20以上,因子负荷在0.35 ~ 0.90之间。Cronbach’s alpha系数为0.825。标准因子负荷范围为0.23 ~ 0.93,近似均方根误差(RMSEA) = 0.086,比较拟合指数(CFI) = 0.98,归一化拟合指数(NFI) = 0.94,拟合优度指数(GFI) = 0.93,标准化均方根残差(SRMR) = 0.061。CVI为0.88,CVR超过标准值。重测信度系数为0.933,信度区间为0.78 ~ 0.87。结论:土耳其版的RAPS-ICU具有良好的效度和可靠性。与临床实践的相关性:经过验证的土耳其版RAPS-ICU为重症监护环境中评估压力损伤风险提供了可靠和准确的工具。其高可靠性和有效性支持其在临床实践中的应用,以加强早期发现和预防策略,最终改善患者的预后。通过将RAPS-ICU纳入常规评估,重症监护护士可以在压力损伤预防方面做出更明智的决定,优化土耳其icu的护理计划和患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信