Tunnel-transposition with veno-venous or veno-arterial re-anastomosis versus skin-flap elevation for second-stage superficialization of brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Vascular Pub Date : 2025-09-12 DOI:10.1177/17085381251379847
Moustafa Mabrouk, Ahmed Fouda, Rasha Gawish, Mohammed ElKassaby
{"title":"Tunnel-transposition with veno-venous or veno-arterial re-anastomosis versus skin-flap elevation for second-stage superficialization of brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula.","authors":"Moustafa Mabrouk, Ahmed Fouda, Rasha Gawish, Mohammed ElKassaby","doi":"10.1177/17085381251379847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionArteriovenous fistula is the preferred vascular access for patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis. Brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistulas are valued for their durability and long-term patency in patients with unsuitable superficial venous anatomy. The basilic vein, located deeper within the arm, offers a larger diameter. However, due to its depth, surgical interventions like superficialization or transposition are necessary to make the vein accessible for routine cannulation. This study compares the outcomes of three different surgical techniques used during the second stage of brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula superficialization.Patients and MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed data from patients who underwent a second-stage brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula between January 2020 and February 2023. The procedure involved elbow brachiobasilic AVF, resulting in vein dilatation and arterialization, followed by superficialization using techniques like skin-flap elevation or tunnel-transposition with veno-venous re-anastomosis or veno-arterial re-anastomosis. Follow-ups included routine clinic visits, duplex ultrasound scans, and monthly surveillance visits.ResultsA study of 238 second-stage brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula procedures revealed no significant differences among the three groups. The skin-flap elevation technique had shorter operative times and higher technical success rates but was associated with higher postoperative complications like hematomas, infections, and nerve injuries. The veno-venous re-anastomosis and veno-arterial re-anastomosis groups had lower complication rates, particularly nerve injuries and steal syndrome, but required longer operative times and had lower technical success rates.ConclusionSuperficial tunneling techniques provide better healing and less complications as compared to skin-flap elevation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"17085381251379847"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381251379847","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionArteriovenous fistula is the preferred vascular access for patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis. Brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistulas are valued for their durability and long-term patency in patients with unsuitable superficial venous anatomy. The basilic vein, located deeper within the arm, offers a larger diameter. However, due to its depth, surgical interventions like superficialization or transposition are necessary to make the vein accessible for routine cannulation. This study compares the outcomes of three different surgical techniques used during the second stage of brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula superficialization.Patients and MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed data from patients who underwent a second-stage brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula between January 2020 and February 2023. The procedure involved elbow brachiobasilic AVF, resulting in vein dilatation and arterialization, followed by superficialization using techniques like skin-flap elevation or tunnel-transposition with veno-venous re-anastomosis or veno-arterial re-anastomosis. Follow-ups included routine clinic visits, duplex ultrasound scans, and monthly surveillance visits.ResultsA study of 238 second-stage brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula procedures revealed no significant differences among the three groups. The skin-flap elevation technique had shorter operative times and higher technical success rates but was associated with higher postoperative complications like hematomas, infections, and nerve injuries. The veno-venous re-anastomosis and veno-arterial re-anastomosis groups had lower complication rates, particularly nerve injuries and steal syndrome, but required longer operative times and had lower technical success rates.ConclusionSuperficial tunneling techniques provide better healing and less complications as compared to skin-flap elevation.

静脉-静脉或静脉-动脉再吻合的隧道转位与皮瓣提升对肱基底动脉动静脉瘘二期浅表化的影响。
摘要动静脉瘘是慢性肾病血液透析患者首选的血管通路。对于浅表静脉解剖不合适的患者,肱基底动静脉瘘因其耐久性和长期通畅而受到重视。basilic静脉位于手臂深处,直径较大。然而,由于其深度,手术干预,如表面化或转位是必要的,使静脉可以进入常规插管。本研究比较了第二阶段肱基底动静脉瘘浅表术中使用的三种不同手术技术的结果。患者和方法本回顾性研究分析了2020年1月至2023年2月期间接受二期肱基底动静脉瘘的患者的数据。该手术涉及肘部肱基底静脉曲张,导致静脉扩张和动脉化,随后使用皮瓣抬高或静脉-静脉再吻合或静脉-动脉再吻合的隧道转位等技术进行浅表化。随访包括常规门诊就诊、双工超声扫描和每月监测就诊。结果238例二期肱基底动静脉瘘手术的研究显示,三组间无显著差异。皮瓣提升技术具有较短的手术时间和较高的技术成功率,但存在较高的术后并发症,如血肿、感染和神经损伤。静脉-静脉再吻合组和静脉-动脉再吻合组并发症发生率较低,特别是神经损伤和偷窃综合征,但手术时间较长,技术成功率较低。结论与皮瓣提升术相比,浅表隧道技术修复效果好,并发症少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vascular
Vascular 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular provides readers with new and unusual up-to-date articles and case reports focusing on vascular and endovascular topics. It is a highly international forum for the discussion and debate of all aspects of this distinct surgical specialty. It also features opinion pieces, literature reviews and controversial issues presented from various points of view.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信