Understanding the countermovement to online presentations of psychiatric disorder that are perceived as "faked".

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Vaughan Bell, Rhiannon White, Lucy Foulkes
{"title":"Understanding the countermovement to online presentations of psychiatric disorder that are perceived as \"faked\".","authors":"Vaughan Bell, Rhiannon White, Lucy Foulkes","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2025.2558503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The self-presentation of psychiatric disorders on social media has generated a countermovement of sceptics who believe some are \"faked\" for reasons of self-promotion. This has been the focus of a Reddit forum called r/FakeDisorderCringe, an active community with almost 300,000 members. Given the influence of online discourse on public attitudes, understanding which diagnoses attract the most scepticism and what conversational themes surround these concerns is important in understanding lay controversies in mental health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used topic modelling using Latent Dirichlet allocation, a natural language processing technique, to analyse over 850,000 forum posts from August 2020 to December 2022 to identify the main topics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Topic modelling identified 15 topics, of which several identified specific disorders: anxiety, depression, OCD (obsessive-compulsive disorder), ADHD (attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder), autism, Tourette's syndrome and tics, and DID (dissociative identity disorder). Other topics included faking and attention-seeking, school and childhood context, trauma and abuse, validity of self-diagnosis, medical research evidence, gender identity and sexuality, profanity, and sarcasm-laden commentary.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scepticism does not mirror previously identified public doubts about the legitimacy of specific diagnoses and seems to more commonly focus on conditions that have seen a recent increase in diagnosis in young people.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2025.2558503","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The self-presentation of psychiatric disorders on social media has generated a countermovement of sceptics who believe some are "faked" for reasons of self-promotion. This has been the focus of a Reddit forum called r/FakeDisorderCringe, an active community with almost 300,000 members. Given the influence of online discourse on public attitudes, understanding which diagnoses attract the most scepticism and what conversational themes surround these concerns is important in understanding lay controversies in mental health.

Methods: We used topic modelling using Latent Dirichlet allocation, a natural language processing technique, to analyse over 850,000 forum posts from August 2020 to December 2022 to identify the main topics.

Results: Topic modelling identified 15 topics, of which several identified specific disorders: anxiety, depression, OCD (obsessive-compulsive disorder), ADHD (attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder), autism, Tourette's syndrome and tics, and DID (dissociative identity disorder). Other topics included faking and attention-seeking, school and childhood context, trauma and abuse, validity of self-diagnosis, medical research evidence, gender identity and sexuality, profanity, and sarcasm-laden commentary.

Conclusions: This scepticism does not mirror previously identified public doubts about the legitimacy of specific diagnoses and seems to more commonly focus on conditions that have seen a recent increase in diagnosis in young people.

了解对被认为是“伪造”的精神疾病在线展示的反作用力。
背景:精神疾病在社交媒体上的自我展示引发了怀疑论者的反运动,他们认为有些是出于自我推销的原因而“伪造”的。这一直是Reddit论坛r/FakeDisorderCringe的焦点,这是一个拥有近30万成员的活跃社区。考虑到网络话语对公众态度的影响,了解哪些诊断吸引了最多的怀疑,以及围绕这些问题的对话主题对于理解心理健康中的争论是很重要的。方法:我们使用自然语言处理技术潜狄利克雷分配(Latent Dirichlet allocation)进行主题建模,分析了2020年8月至2022年12月期间超过85万篇论坛帖子,以确定主要主题。结果:主题建模确定了15个主题,其中几个确定了特定的疾病:焦虑、抑郁、强迫症、注意力缺陷和多动障碍、自闭症、图雷特综合征和抽搐,以及DID(分离性身份障碍)。其他话题包括假装和寻求关注、学校和童年背景、创伤和虐待、自我诊断的有效性、医学研究证据、性别认同和性取向、亵渎和充满讽刺的评论。结论:这种怀疑并没有反映出先前确定的公众对特定诊断合法性的怀疑,似乎更普遍地关注于最近在年轻人中诊断增加的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mental Health
Journal of Mental Health PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health is an international forum for the latest research in the mental health field. Reaching over 65 countries, the journal reports on the best in evidence-based practice around the world and provides a channel of communication between the many disciplines involved in mental health research and practice. The journal encourages multi-disciplinary research and welcomes contributions that have involved the users of mental health services. The international editorial team are committed to seeking out excellent work from a range of sources and theoretical perspectives. The journal not only reflects current good practice but also aims to influence policy by reporting on innovations that challenge traditional ways of working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信