{"title":"Unraveling shoulder balance in scoliosis: a clinical and radiological analysis.","authors":"Nikhil Goyal, Siddharth S Sethy, Pratibha Bhatia, Vishal Verma, Saptarshi Barman, Bhaskar Sarkar, Pankaj Kandwal","doi":"10.1007/s43390-025-01177-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Shoulder balance is an important parameter while assessing the scoliosis deformity from a patient as well as clinician's perspective following the treatment. While there is uniform consensus about the importance of shoulder balance in scoliosis patients, what constitutes shoulder symmetry is still debatable. The aim of the study was to evaluate radiographic and clinical parameters both for medial and lateral components of shoulder balance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective database of scoliosis was reviewed. Patient demographics and radiological parameters, including radiographic shoulder height, clavicle angle, T1 tilt, first-rib angle, coracoid height difference, and clavicle rib intersection distance, were recorded. Shoulder angle, axillary angle, neck trapezius angle, lateral and medial shoulder height, axillary height, and neck height were recorded for clinical parameters by two independent observers. SRS-22r score was used for patient-reported outcome measure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>57 patients (AIS = 31, EOS = 26) were recruited. Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability was excellent for both radiographic and clinical parameters. Most of the radiological parameter had poor-to-moderate correlation with clinical parameters except Radiological Shoulder Height with Lateral Shoulder Height (r = 0.6, p < 0.05) and First Rib Angle with Medial Shoulder Height (r = 0.6, p < 0.05) having strong corelations. On comparing EOS and AIS patients for radiographic and clinical parameters correlation, no significant difference was found between two groups. First rib angle, neck trapezial angle, and neck height were significantly higher in medial shoulder imbalance group, while coracoid angle, radiological shoulder height, coracoid height difference, and shoulder angle were significantly higher in lateral shoulder imbalance group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results indicated that radiographic parameters could only partially reflect the clinical appearance of shoulders. In surgical planning of deformity correction, both medial and lateral components of shoulder balance should be taken into consideration for both radiological and clinical parameters. Level of Evidence Diagnostic study, Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-025-01177-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Shoulder balance is an important parameter while assessing the scoliosis deformity from a patient as well as clinician's perspective following the treatment. While there is uniform consensus about the importance of shoulder balance in scoliosis patients, what constitutes shoulder symmetry is still debatable. The aim of the study was to evaluate radiographic and clinical parameters both for medial and lateral components of shoulder balance.
Methods: A prospective database of scoliosis was reviewed. Patient demographics and radiological parameters, including radiographic shoulder height, clavicle angle, T1 tilt, first-rib angle, coracoid height difference, and clavicle rib intersection distance, were recorded. Shoulder angle, axillary angle, neck trapezius angle, lateral and medial shoulder height, axillary height, and neck height were recorded for clinical parameters by two independent observers. SRS-22r score was used for patient-reported outcome measure.
Results: 57 patients (AIS = 31, EOS = 26) were recruited. Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability was excellent for both radiographic and clinical parameters. Most of the radiological parameter had poor-to-moderate correlation with clinical parameters except Radiological Shoulder Height with Lateral Shoulder Height (r = 0.6, p < 0.05) and First Rib Angle with Medial Shoulder Height (r = 0.6, p < 0.05) having strong corelations. On comparing EOS and AIS patients for radiographic and clinical parameters correlation, no significant difference was found between two groups. First rib angle, neck trapezial angle, and neck height were significantly higher in medial shoulder imbalance group, while coracoid angle, radiological shoulder height, coracoid height difference, and shoulder angle were significantly higher in lateral shoulder imbalance group.
Conclusions: The results indicated that radiographic parameters could only partially reflect the clinical appearance of shoulders. In surgical planning of deformity correction, both medial and lateral components of shoulder balance should be taken into consideration for both radiological and clinical parameters. Level of Evidence Diagnostic study, Level III.
期刊介绍:
Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.