Project interpret cholangiogram at the SAGES 2024 Education & Innovation Center: skill deficiency in bile duct injury recognition among surgical residents.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Emily M Hannah, Matthew B Bloom, Steven D Schwaitzberg
{"title":"Project interpret cholangiogram at the SAGES 2024 Education & Innovation Center: skill deficiency in bile duct injury recognition among surgical residents.","authors":"Emily M Hannah, Matthew B Bloom, Steven D Schwaitzberg","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-12145-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bile duct injuries (BDI) remain a rare but dreaded complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Proposed solutions to reduce BDI involve increased use of cholangiograms in patients with ambiguous anatomy. One explanation for the underutilization of intraoperative cholangiograms (IOC) is an unfamiliarity in interpreting cholangiograms, particularly amongst surgical trainees. We aim to gauge the current confidence levels and knowledge state of interpreting cholangiograms of surgeons at all levels of training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were screened based on their SAGES 2024 Annual Conference attendance and completed the \"Cholangiogram Quiz\" at a station in the SAGES Education & Innovation Center. Data were collected on training background, and confidence in identifying IOC findings. Participants (n = 88, surgical residents, fellows and attendings) completed eighteen multiple choice questions on interpreting a cholangiogram.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall quiz scores and confidence in interpreting IOC increased with level of training (p < 0.001). Out of normal IOC, aberrant ducts, BDI, common bile duct calculi, and filling defects, PGY1-5 residents were least confident identifying aberrant ducts, followed by BDI. PGY1-3 residents performed worse than attendings on questions on BDI (p < 0.001). Differences in quiz performance by training levels did not reach statistical significance for any other topic tested. Better quiz performance was directly correlated to more frequent use of IOC (p < 0.001). Higher confidence was associated with better quiz performance for all participants (p = 0.006). Confidence interpreting normal IOC and BDI on cholangiogram were directly correlated to quiz performance on these topics (normal IOC: p = 0.005, BDI: p = 0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants with more advanced training, and who more frequently utilize IOC performed better on our quiz. Compared to other findings seen on IOC, residents failed to identify BDI. Surgical residents would benefit from targeted educational interventions to bolster confidence and improve accuracy in identifying BDI on IOC.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12145-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bile duct injuries (BDI) remain a rare but dreaded complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Proposed solutions to reduce BDI involve increased use of cholangiograms in patients with ambiguous anatomy. One explanation for the underutilization of intraoperative cholangiograms (IOC) is an unfamiliarity in interpreting cholangiograms, particularly amongst surgical trainees. We aim to gauge the current confidence levels and knowledge state of interpreting cholangiograms of surgeons at all levels of training.

Methods: Participants were screened based on their SAGES 2024 Annual Conference attendance and completed the "Cholangiogram Quiz" at a station in the SAGES Education & Innovation Center. Data were collected on training background, and confidence in identifying IOC findings. Participants (n = 88, surgical residents, fellows and attendings) completed eighteen multiple choice questions on interpreting a cholangiogram.

Results: Overall quiz scores and confidence in interpreting IOC increased with level of training (p < 0.001). Out of normal IOC, aberrant ducts, BDI, common bile duct calculi, and filling defects, PGY1-5 residents were least confident identifying aberrant ducts, followed by BDI. PGY1-3 residents performed worse than attendings on questions on BDI (p < 0.001). Differences in quiz performance by training levels did not reach statistical significance for any other topic tested. Better quiz performance was directly correlated to more frequent use of IOC (p < 0.001). Higher confidence was associated with better quiz performance for all participants (p = 0.006). Confidence interpreting normal IOC and BDI on cholangiogram were directly correlated to quiz performance on these topics (normal IOC: p = 0.005, BDI: p = 0.047).

Conclusions: Participants with more advanced training, and who more frequently utilize IOC performed better on our quiz. Compared to other findings seen on IOC, residents failed to identify BDI. Surgical residents would benefit from targeted educational interventions to bolster confidence and improve accuracy in identifying BDI on IOC.

SAGES 2024教育创新中心项目解读胆管造影:外科住院医师胆管损伤识别技能不足。
背景:胆管损伤(BDI)是腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)中一种罕见但可怕的并发症。建议的降低BDI的解决方案包括在解剖结构不明确的患者中增加胆道造影的使用。术中胆管造影(IOC)应用不足的一个原因是对胆管造影的解释不熟悉,尤其是在外科培训生中。我们的目的是衡量当前的信心水平和知识状态解释胆管造影的各级培训的外科医生。方法:根据参加SAGES 2024年年会的情况对参与者进行筛选,并在SAGES教育与创新中心的一个站点完成“胆道造影测试”。收集了关于培训背景和确定国际奥委会调查结果的信心的数据。参与者(n = 88,外科住院医师,研究员和主治医师)完成了18道关于胆管造影解释的选择题。结果:随着训练水平的提高,整体测试分数和对IOC解释的信心增加(p结论:接受更高级训练的参与者,以及更频繁地使用IOC的参与者在我们的测试中表现得更好。与在IOC上看到的其他发现相比,居民未能识别BDI。外科住院医师将受益于有针对性的教育干预,以增强信心并提高识别IOC中BDI的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信