Ben Reader, Sibelle Aurelie Yemele Kitio, Steven M Smith
{"title":"Pediatric Home-Based Palliative Care and Hospice: Characterizing and Comparing the Populations.","authors":"Ben Reader, Sibelle Aurelie Yemele Kitio, Steven M Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Home-based palliative care (HBPC) and hospice programs offer support for children with complex life-shortening conditions. However, there is little comparison of the characteristics and care trajectories of children and young adults enrolled in HBPC versus hospice, particularly across different age groups.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the characteristics of children and young adults who received HBPC and/or hospice and identify differences and similarities between these populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of children birth-21 years of age who received HBPC and/or hospice in their home between 1/2019-12/2022 at a single site. Data were manually extracted from the electronic health record. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square or Fisher's exacts tests for categorical variables, and Mann-Whitney U tests for non-normally distributed continuous variables. Subgroup analyses excluded children <1 year of age due to differences unique to population including utilization of perinatal palliative care or palliative care in the neonatal intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 113 participants, hospice recipients were younger (median 2 vs. 7 years; P = 0.033), more likely to have an oncologic diagnosis, and had a higher mortality during the study period (69.6% vs. 22.1%; P < 0.001). HBPC participants had more hospital admissions, longer inpatient stays, and more outpatient visits. Subgroup analyses of children ≥1 year revealed diagnosis and code status differences, with hospice participants more likely to have 'allow natural death' orders and experience a code status change.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among children and young adults, significant differences exist between those receiving HBPC and those receiving hospice care, particularly in age, diagnosis, and healthcare utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.09.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context: Home-based palliative care (HBPC) and hospice programs offer support for children with complex life-shortening conditions. However, there is little comparison of the characteristics and care trajectories of children and young adults enrolled in HBPC versus hospice, particularly across different age groups.
Objectives: To compare the characteristics of children and young adults who received HBPC and/or hospice and identify differences and similarities between these populations.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study of children birth-21 years of age who received HBPC and/or hospice in their home between 1/2019-12/2022 at a single site. Data were manually extracted from the electronic health record. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square or Fisher's exacts tests for categorical variables, and Mann-Whitney U tests for non-normally distributed continuous variables. Subgroup analyses excluded children <1 year of age due to differences unique to population including utilization of perinatal palliative care or palliative care in the neonatal intensive care unit.
Results: Of 113 participants, hospice recipients were younger (median 2 vs. 7 years; P = 0.033), more likely to have an oncologic diagnosis, and had a higher mortality during the study period (69.6% vs. 22.1%; P < 0.001). HBPC participants had more hospital admissions, longer inpatient stays, and more outpatient visits. Subgroup analyses of children ≥1 year revealed diagnosis and code status differences, with hospice participants more likely to have 'allow natural death' orders and experience a code status change.
Conclusion: Among children and young adults, significant differences exist between those receiving HBPC and those receiving hospice care, particularly in age, diagnosis, and healthcare utilization.
背景:以家庭为基础的姑息治疗(HBPC)和临终关怀计划为患有复杂生命缩短疾病的儿童提供支持。然而,很少有关于HBPC和临终关怀的儿童和年轻人的特征和护理轨迹的比较,特别是在不同年龄组之间。目的:比较接受HBPC和/或临终关怀的儿童和年轻人的特征,并确定这些人群之间的异同。方法:对2019年1月至2022年12月期间在单一地点接受HBPC和/或临终关怀的出生-21岁儿童进行回顾性队列研究。数据是手动从电子健康记录中提取的。统计分析包括对分类变量的描述性统计、卡方检验或Fisher精确检验,以及对非正态分布的连续变量的Mann-Whitney U检验。结果:在113名参与者中,安宁疗护接受者较年轻(中位数为2岁vs. 7岁;p=0.033),更可能有肿瘤诊断,且在研究期间死亡率较高(69.6% vs. 22.1%)。结论:在儿童和年轻人中,接受HBPC和接受安宁疗护者之间存在显著差异,特别是在年龄、诊断和医疗保健利用方面。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.