Pediatric Home-Based Palliative Care and Hospice: Characterizing and Comparing the Populations.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ben Reader, Sibelle Aurelie Yemele Kitio, Steven M Smith
{"title":"Pediatric Home-Based Palliative Care and Hospice: Characterizing and Comparing the Populations.","authors":"Ben Reader, Sibelle Aurelie Yemele Kitio, Steven M Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Home-based palliative care (HBPC) and hospice programs offer support for children with complex life-shortening conditions. However, there is little comparison of the characteristics and care trajectories of children and young adults enrolled in HBPC versus hospice, particularly across different age groups.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the characteristics of children and young adults who received HBPC and/or hospice and identify differences and similarities between these populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of children birth-21 years of age who received HBPC and/or hospice in their home between 1/2019-12/2022 at a single site. Data were manually extracted from the electronic health record. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square or Fisher's exacts tests for categorical variables, and Mann-Whitney U tests for non-normally distributed continuous variables. Subgroup analyses excluded children <1 year of age due to differences unique to population including utilization of perinatal palliative care or palliative care in the neonatal intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 113 participants, hospice recipients were younger (median 2 vs. 7 years; P = 0.033), more likely to have an oncologic diagnosis, and had a higher mortality during the study period (69.6% vs. 22.1%; P < 0.001). HBPC participants had more hospital admissions, longer inpatient stays, and more outpatient visits. Subgroup analyses of children ≥1 year revealed diagnosis and code status differences, with hospice participants more likely to have 'allow natural death' orders and experience a code status change.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among children and young adults, significant differences exist between those receiving HBPC and those receiving hospice care, particularly in age, diagnosis, and healthcare utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.09.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Home-based palliative care (HBPC) and hospice programs offer support for children with complex life-shortening conditions. However, there is little comparison of the characteristics and care trajectories of children and young adults enrolled in HBPC versus hospice, particularly across different age groups.

Objectives: To compare the characteristics of children and young adults who received HBPC and/or hospice and identify differences and similarities between these populations.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of children birth-21 years of age who received HBPC and/or hospice in their home between 1/2019-12/2022 at a single site. Data were manually extracted from the electronic health record. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square or Fisher's exacts tests for categorical variables, and Mann-Whitney U tests for non-normally distributed continuous variables. Subgroup analyses excluded children <1 year of age due to differences unique to population including utilization of perinatal palliative care or palliative care in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Results: Of 113 participants, hospice recipients were younger (median 2 vs. 7 years; P = 0.033), more likely to have an oncologic diagnosis, and had a higher mortality during the study period (69.6% vs. 22.1%; P < 0.001). HBPC participants had more hospital admissions, longer inpatient stays, and more outpatient visits. Subgroup analyses of children ≥1 year revealed diagnosis and code status differences, with hospice participants more likely to have 'allow natural death' orders and experience a code status change.

Conclusion: Among children and young adults, significant differences exist between those receiving HBPC and those receiving hospice care, particularly in age, diagnosis, and healthcare utilization.

儿科以家庭为基础的姑息治疗和临终关怀:人群的特征和比较。
背景:以家庭为基础的姑息治疗(HBPC)和临终关怀计划为患有复杂生命缩短疾病的儿童提供支持。然而,很少有关于HBPC和临终关怀的儿童和年轻人的特征和护理轨迹的比较,特别是在不同年龄组之间。目的:比较接受HBPC和/或临终关怀的儿童和年轻人的特征,并确定这些人群之间的异同。方法:对2019年1月至2022年12月期间在单一地点接受HBPC和/或临终关怀的出生-21岁儿童进行回顾性队列研究。数据是手动从电子健康记录中提取的。统计分析包括对分类变量的描述性统计、卡方检验或Fisher精确检验,以及对非正态分布的连续变量的Mann-Whitney U检验。结果:在113名参与者中,安宁疗护接受者较年轻(中位数为2岁vs. 7岁;p=0.033),更可能有肿瘤诊断,且在研究期间死亡率较高(69.6% vs. 22.1%)。结论:在儿童和年轻人中,接受HBPC和接受安宁疗护者之间存在显著差异,特别是在年龄、诊断和医疗保健利用方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信