Neurological Outcome Beyond the ICU in Patients with Severe Acute Brain Injury: A Knowledge gap for ICU Teams.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Wolmet E Haksteen, Ruben J Bax, Daan C Velseboer, Janneke Horn
{"title":"Neurological Outcome Beyond the ICU in Patients with Severe Acute Brain Injury: A Knowledge gap for ICU Teams.","authors":"Wolmet E Haksteen, Ruben J Bax, Daan C Velseboer, Janneke Horn","doi":"10.1177/08850666251375411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundIn patients with severe acute brain injury (SABI) admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) outcome is often uncertain. Physicians have to decide on continuation or withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WLST) in the first weeks. However, long-term neurological outcomes rarely reach the ICU team, limiting the opportunity to learn from decisions. This study aimed to assess the availability of long-term neurological outcome data and from which sources this could be retrieved.MethodsThis single-center retrospective observational study included all ICU survivors with SABI between January first and December 31<sup>st</sup> 2022. Patient characteristics and neurological outcome data were extracted from the patient records. Neurological outcome was assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) within 6 months after admission.ResultsA total of 65 patients were included, the median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score at admission was 6 [IQR 4-7], the most common admission diagnosis was subarachnoid hemorrhage (34%). The mean ICU stay was 8 days (SD 8) and hospital stay 38 days (SD 29). Outcome data could be retrieved from neurology or neurosurgery outpatient clinic notes in 54% of patients, in 12% from the post-ICU clinic and in 2% from other hospitals, rehabilitation facilities and nursing homes. Mortality within 6 months was 26%. A favorable GOSE score (≥ 5) was found in 18 patients (28%), an unfavorable score in 42 patients (64%), and in 5 patients (8%) no outcome could be determined.ConclusionsFunctional recovery outcomes could be extracted from the patient records in nearly all ICU survivors with SABI. However, these outcomes were mostly identified from outpatient clinic notes from the neurology and neurosurgery department and it is uncertain whether these outcomes reach ICU physicians. A clear feedback loop is needed, to ensure ICU teams can learn from long-term patient trajectories and improve future patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666251375411"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666251375411","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundIn patients with severe acute brain injury (SABI) admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) outcome is often uncertain. Physicians have to decide on continuation or withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WLST) in the first weeks. However, long-term neurological outcomes rarely reach the ICU team, limiting the opportunity to learn from decisions. This study aimed to assess the availability of long-term neurological outcome data and from which sources this could be retrieved.MethodsThis single-center retrospective observational study included all ICU survivors with SABI between January first and December 31st 2022. Patient characteristics and neurological outcome data were extracted from the patient records. Neurological outcome was assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) within 6 months after admission.ResultsA total of 65 patients were included, the median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score at admission was 6 [IQR 4-7], the most common admission diagnosis was subarachnoid hemorrhage (34%). The mean ICU stay was 8 days (SD 8) and hospital stay 38 days (SD 29). Outcome data could be retrieved from neurology or neurosurgery outpatient clinic notes in 54% of patients, in 12% from the post-ICU clinic and in 2% from other hospitals, rehabilitation facilities and nursing homes. Mortality within 6 months was 26%. A favorable GOSE score (≥ 5) was found in 18 patients (28%), an unfavorable score in 42 patients (64%), and in 5 patients (8%) no outcome could be determined.ConclusionsFunctional recovery outcomes could be extracted from the patient records in nearly all ICU survivors with SABI. However, these outcomes were mostly identified from outpatient clinic notes from the neurology and neurosurgery department and it is uncertain whether these outcomes reach ICU physicians. A clear feedback loop is needed, to ensure ICU teams can learn from long-term patient trajectories and improve future patient care.

重症急性脑损伤患者在ICU之外的神经预后:ICU团队的知识差距。
背景:重症监护病房(ICU)收治的严重急性脑损伤(SABI)患者的预后往往不确定。医生必须在最初几周内决定继续或停止生命维持治疗(WLST)。然而,长期的神经学结果很少到达ICU团队,限制了从决策中学习的机会。本研究旨在评估长期神经预后数据的可用性,以及从哪些来源可以检索到这些数据。方法本研究为单中心回顾性观察性研究,纳入2022年1月1日至12月31日期间所有重症监护病房的SABI幸存者。从患者记录中提取患者特征和神经预后数据。入院后6个月内使用格拉斯哥预后量表(GOSE)评估神经系统预后。结果共纳入65例患者,入院时格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)中位数为6分[IQR 4-7],入院诊断以蛛网膜下腔出血最为常见(34%)。平均ICU住院时间8天(SD 8),住院时间38天(SD 29)。结果数据可以从54%的患者的神经病学或神经外科门诊记录中检索到,12%的患者来自icu后诊所,2%的患者来自其他医院、康复机构和养老院。6个月内死亡率为26%。18例(28%)患者的GOSE评分为有利(≥5),42例(64%)患者的评分为不利,5例(8%)患者的结果无法确定。结论几乎所有重症监护室存活的SABI患者的功能恢复结果都可以从患者记录中提取出来。然而,这些结果大多来自神经病学和神经外科的门诊记录,不确定这些结果是否达到ICU医生。需要一个明确的反馈循环,以确保ICU团队能够从长期患者轨迹中学习并改善未来的患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信