Sebastian Ordoñez-Cure, Maria José Uparela-Reyes, Santiago Cardona-Collazos, Adrián David Fernández-Osorio, Javier Orozco
{"title":"Prolactinomas and Knosp grade: when is surgery the appropriate choice? A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Sebastian Ordoñez-Cure, Maria José Uparela-Reyes, Santiago Cardona-Collazos, Adrián David Fernández-Osorio, Javier Orozco","doi":"10.3171/2025.5.JNS243092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Prolactinomas are the most common type of pituitary adenoma. Historically, surgery was the primary treatment, but the introduction of dopaminergic agonists in the 1970s changed therapeutic practices. Recent guidelines (2023) from the Pituitary Society now recommend surgery as the first-line option for select prolactinomas, particularly those with certain grades as defined by the Knosp classification system. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the safety of and the biochemical remission rates following resection of prolactinomas classified preoperatively by Knosp grade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across the MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences), and Cochrane CENTRAL (Central Register of Controlled Trials) databases from inception to February 2024. Eligible studies reported individual participant data on the biochemical remission and surgical outcomes of patients with prolactinomas stratified by Knosp grade. A random effects meta-analysis was performed to synthesize biochemical remission rates and relative risks, with results presented in forest plots. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to Knosp grade, heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic, prediction intervals were reported, and publication bias was evaluated through funnel plots and Egger's test. This review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration no.: CRD42024602904) and followed the PRISMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies involving 1010 patients with prolactinomas undergoing transsphenoidal surgery were included. Prolactinomas classified as Knosp grades 0-2 demonstrated significantly higher biochemical remission rates of 75% (95% CI 67%-82%, prediction interval 42%-96%, I2 = 81.5%, p < 0.0001) compared to 22% (95% CI 16%-31%, prediction interval 11%-38%, I2 = 17.2%, p = 0.57) for Knosp grades 3-4. Transsphenoidal surgery was associated with favorable outcomes characterized by low complication rates and no reported deaths.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Resection for Knosp grade 0-2 prolactinomas appears to be an effective first-line treatment option, resulting in favorable biochemical remission rates and low complication risks. These findings support considering surgery in appropriately selected patients, particularly at experienced medical centers. However, the high heterogeneity among and the observational design of most included studies limit the strength of the conclusions. Thus, further studies are needed to compare surgical and medical management strategies across Knosp grades and to refine patient selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.5.JNS243092","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Prolactinomas are the most common type of pituitary adenoma. Historically, surgery was the primary treatment, but the introduction of dopaminergic agonists in the 1970s changed therapeutic practices. Recent guidelines (2023) from the Pituitary Society now recommend surgery as the first-line option for select prolactinomas, particularly those with certain grades as defined by the Knosp classification system. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the safety of and the biochemical remission rates following resection of prolactinomas classified preoperatively by Knosp grade.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across the MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences), and Cochrane CENTRAL (Central Register of Controlled Trials) databases from inception to February 2024. Eligible studies reported individual participant data on the biochemical remission and surgical outcomes of patients with prolactinomas stratified by Knosp grade. A random effects meta-analysis was performed to synthesize biochemical remission rates and relative risks, with results presented in forest plots. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to Knosp grade, heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic, prediction intervals were reported, and publication bias was evaluated through funnel plots and Egger's test. This review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration no.: CRD42024602904) and followed the PRISMA guidelines.
Results: Twelve studies involving 1010 patients with prolactinomas undergoing transsphenoidal surgery were included. Prolactinomas classified as Knosp grades 0-2 demonstrated significantly higher biochemical remission rates of 75% (95% CI 67%-82%, prediction interval 42%-96%, I2 = 81.5%, p < 0.0001) compared to 22% (95% CI 16%-31%, prediction interval 11%-38%, I2 = 17.2%, p = 0.57) for Knosp grades 3-4. Transsphenoidal surgery was associated with favorable outcomes characterized by low complication rates and no reported deaths.
Conclusions: Resection for Knosp grade 0-2 prolactinomas appears to be an effective first-line treatment option, resulting in favorable biochemical remission rates and low complication risks. These findings support considering surgery in appropriately selected patients, particularly at experienced medical centers. However, the high heterogeneity among and the observational design of most included studies limit the strength of the conclusions. Thus, further studies are needed to compare surgical and medical management strategies across Knosp grades and to refine patient selection.
目的:催乳素瘤是最常见的垂体腺瘤类型。从历史上看,手术是主要的治疗方法,但20世纪70年代多巴胺能激动剂的引入改变了治疗方法。垂体学会(Pituitary Society)最近的指南(2023)现在推荐手术作为选择催乳素瘤的一线选择,特别是那些根据Knosp分类系统定义的特定级别。本系统综述和荟萃分析是为了评估术前按Knosp分级的泌乳素瘤切除术后的安全性和生化缓解率。方法:对MEDLINE(通过PubMed)、Scopus、Web of Science、LILACS(拉丁美洲和加勒比健康科学文献)和Cochrane CENTRAL(中央对照试验登记)数据库进行全面的文献检索,检索时间从数据库建立到2024年2月。符合条件的研究报告了按Knosp分级的泌乳素瘤患者的生化缓解和手术结果的个体参与者数据。随机效应荟萃分析综合生化缓解率和相对风险,结果呈现在森林样地。按Knosp等级进行亚组分析,采用I2统计量评估异质性,报告预测区间,通过漏斗图和Egger检验评估发表偏倚。本综述已在国际前瞻性系统综述注册(注册号:: CRD42024602904),并遵循PRISMA指南。结果:纳入了12项研究,涉及1010例经蝶窦手术的泌乳素瘤患者。Knosp分级为0-2级的泌乳素瘤的生化缓解率为75% (95% CI 67%-82%,预测区间42%-96%,I2 = 81.5%, p < 0.0001),而Knosp分级为3-4级的泌乳素瘤的生化缓解率为22% (95% CI 16%-31%,预测区间11%-38%,I2 = 17.2%, p = 0.57)。经蝶窦手术的预后良好,其特点是并发症发生率低,无死亡报告。结论:Knosp 0-2级泌乳素瘤切除是一种有效的一线治疗选择,生化缓解率良好,并发症发生率低。这些发现支持在适当选择的患者中考虑手术,特别是在经验丰富的医疗中心。然而,大多数纳入研究的高度异质性和观察设计限制了结论的强度。因此,需要进一步的研究来比较Knosp分级的手术和医疗管理策略,并改进患者选择。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.