Religious rights continue to garner attention from Supreme Court, with likely impacts on campus

Michael Porter Esq.
{"title":"Religious rights continue to garner attention from Supreme Court, with likely impacts on campus","authors":"Michael Porter Esq.","doi":"10.1002/casr.31463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent years, a significant number of religious freedom cases have made their way to the Supreme Court. And individuals asserting religious rights have found a welcoming audience in a majority of the Supreme Court justices. As a result, the legal constructs under which religious issues have been evaluated for years cannot be relied upon. For many years, public institutions facing religious freedom issues had strong arguments when choosing an institutional priority over an individual religious right. The institution could assert that it would risk violating the Establishment Clause by appearing to favor religion by allowing an individual to invoke religion in certain circumstances. For example, in some circumstances, an institution might have precluded a student speaker at an event from making religious statements on those grounds — doing so now is more complicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":100210,"journal":{"name":"Campus Security Report","volume":"22 6","pages":"6-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Campus Security Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/casr.31463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, a significant number of religious freedom cases have made their way to the Supreme Court. And individuals asserting religious rights have found a welcoming audience in a majority of the Supreme Court justices. As a result, the legal constructs under which religious issues have been evaluated for years cannot be relied upon. For many years, public institutions facing religious freedom issues had strong arguments when choosing an institutional priority over an individual religious right. The institution could assert that it would risk violating the Establishment Clause by appearing to favor religion by allowing an individual to invoke religion in certain circumstances. For example, in some circumstances, an institution might have precluded a student speaker at an event from making religious statements on those grounds — doing so now is more complicated.

宗教权利继续受到最高法院的关注,可能对校园产生影响
近年来,有相当数量的宗教自由案件被提交至最高法院。主张宗教权利的个人得到了大多数最高法院大法官的欢迎。其结果是,多年来用来评估宗教问题的法律结构不能依靠。多年来,面对宗教自由问题的公共机构在选择机构优先于个人宗教权利时有着强烈的争论。该机构可以声称,允许个人在某些情况下援引宗教信仰,可能会冒违反《政教分离条款》的风险。例如,在某些情况下,一个机构可能会以这些理由禁止学生演讲者在一次活动中发表宗教声明——现在这样做就更加复杂了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信