Fahim Shakib , Johan Schoukens , Alexander Yu. Pogromsky , Alexey Pavlov , Nathan van de Wouw
{"title":"Accuracy bounds for the simulation of a class of continuous-time nonlinear models","authors":"Fahim Shakib , Johan Schoukens , Alexander Yu. Pogromsky , Alexey Pavlov , Nathan van de Wouw","doi":"10.1016/j.automatica.2025.112543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Real-world dynamic systems evolve in the continuous-time world, while their models are simulated in the digital world using discrete-time numerical simulation algorithms. Such simulation is essential for a variety of system and control problems such as system identification and performance analysis of (control) systems. Ideally, the simulated model response should be identical to the system response. However, this is typically not the case in practice, even when the effects of unmodelled dynamics and parametric uncertainty are excluded. Even in that scenario, a mismatch exists between the response of the system and the model due to the interface between the physical world and the digital computer, unknown disturbances, and simulation inaccuracies. For the class of continuous-time, nonlinear Lur’e-type systems, this paper analyses the mismatch between the steady-state system response and the steady-state model response computed using the so-called mixed time–frequency algorithm. Firstly, a bound on the mismatch between the steady-state system response and the computed steady-state model response based on continuous-time signals is derived. Secondly, a bound for the same mismatch is derived for a sampled version of the signals. The bounds are further decomposed into several components, each given an interpretation that can be used to reduce the bounds on the mismatch. In a numerical case study, we show that reducing the bounds also reduces the actual mismatch.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55413,"journal":{"name":"Automatica","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 112543"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automatica","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005109825004388","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Real-world dynamic systems evolve in the continuous-time world, while their models are simulated in the digital world using discrete-time numerical simulation algorithms. Such simulation is essential for a variety of system and control problems such as system identification and performance analysis of (control) systems. Ideally, the simulated model response should be identical to the system response. However, this is typically not the case in practice, even when the effects of unmodelled dynamics and parametric uncertainty are excluded. Even in that scenario, a mismatch exists between the response of the system and the model due to the interface between the physical world and the digital computer, unknown disturbances, and simulation inaccuracies. For the class of continuous-time, nonlinear Lur’e-type systems, this paper analyses the mismatch between the steady-state system response and the steady-state model response computed using the so-called mixed time–frequency algorithm. Firstly, a bound on the mismatch between the steady-state system response and the computed steady-state model response based on continuous-time signals is derived. Secondly, a bound for the same mismatch is derived for a sampled version of the signals. The bounds are further decomposed into several components, each given an interpretation that can be used to reduce the bounds on the mismatch. In a numerical case study, we show that reducing the bounds also reduces the actual mismatch.
期刊介绍:
Automatica is a leading archival publication in the field of systems and control. The field encompasses today a broad set of areas and topics, and is thriving not only within itself but also in terms of its impact on other fields, such as communications, computers, biology, energy and economics. Since its inception in 1963, Automatica has kept abreast with the evolution of the field over the years, and has emerged as a leading publication driving the trends in the field.
After being founded in 1963, Automatica became a journal of the International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC) in 1969. It features a characteristic blend of theoretical and applied papers of archival, lasting value, reporting cutting edge research results by authors across the globe. It features articles in distinct categories, including regular, brief and survey papers, technical communiqués, correspondence items, as well as reviews on published books of interest to the readership. It occasionally publishes special issues on emerging new topics or established mature topics of interest to a broad audience.
Automatica solicits original high-quality contributions in all the categories listed above, and in all areas of systems and control interpreted in a broad sense and evolving constantly. They may be submitted directly to a subject editor or to the Editor-in-Chief if not sure about the subject area. Editorial procedures in place assure careful, fair, and prompt handling of all submitted articles. Accepted papers appear in the journal in the shortest time feasible given production time constraints.